The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti erm

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Anti-ERM is a primary antibody that recognizes the Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (ERM) family of proteins. ERM proteins play a role in linking the cell membrane to the actin cytoskeleton. The Anti-ERM antibody can be used to detect and analyze the expression levels of ERM proteins in cells and tissues.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using anti erm

1

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tissues were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer consisting of 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS, 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, and 1 × protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, United States). The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 4°C and separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), then transferred to PVDF membrane. After blocking in PBS containing 5% milk and 0.1% Tween-20, the membrane was incubated with primary antibody at 4°C over night, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Bio-Rad, Cat. No. 170-6515 or 170-6516) at room temperature for an hour. The signals were detected with the ECL system (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, United States). Primary antibodies used are as follows: anti-ERM (rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat. No. 3142), anti-pERM (rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, Cat. No. 3726), anti-CDK5 (rabbit, Santa Cruz, Cat. No. sc-173), and anti-GAPDH (mouse, Millipore, Cat. No. MAB374).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence and Immunoblotting of Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish whole-mount immunofluorescence (IF) was performed as previously described33 (link). The following antibodies were used for IF: anti-CLIC5 (B-23; sc-133468; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:10), anti-CLIC5 (A-11; sc-271863; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:10), anti-γTubulin (clone GTU‐88; Sigma Aldrich; 1:5000), anti-GFP (ab13970; Abcam; 1:200), anti-acetylated αTubulin (clone 6-11B-1; Sigma Aldrich; 1:500) and anti-phospho-Ezrin (Thr567) (PA5-37763; Invitrogen; 1:200). Cy3 (1:1000) and Alexa-488/-546/-647 (1:1000) labelled secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch and Molecular Probes (Invitrogen), respectively. Immunoblotting (IB) was performed as previously described47 (link). The following antibodies were used for IB: anti-CLIC5 (B-23; sc-133468; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:200), anti‐pERM (#3141; Cell Signaling; 1:1000), anti‐ERM (#3142; Cell Signaling; 1:1000), anti‐γTubulin (clone GTU‐88; Sigma Aldrich; 1:5000) and respective HRP‐conjugated antibodies (DAKO; 1:5000). Histological and transverse sectioning procedures were performed as previously described33 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue was homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (cat. no. P0013B; Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and incubated on ice for 30 min. The supernatant following centrifugation (at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C) was used for western blotting. Western blotting was performed as described previously (25 (link)). Blots were incubated overnight with the following primary antibodies: Anti-podoplanin (rabbit polyclonal antibody; 1:300; cat. no. 251419; Abbiotec, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-β-tubulin (mouse monoclonal antibody; 1:5,000; cat. no. AT0003; CMCTAG, Inc., Milwaukee, WI, USA) and anti-cofilin (rabbit monoclonal antibody; 1:1,000; cat. no. 5175, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-phospho-cofilin (rabbit monoclonal antibody; 1:1,000; cat. no. 3313; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ERM (rabbit monoclonal antibody; 1:1,000; cat. no. 3142; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho-ERM (rabbit monoclonal antibody; 1:1,000; cat. no. 3726; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MLC-2 (rabbit monoclonal antibody; 1:1,000; cat. no. 8505; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-phospho-MLC-2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 3671; Cell Signaling Technology). Western blots were visualized using an electrophoretic gel imaging system (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blotting Protocol for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected and resuspended in RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with added protease inhibitors (Roche). Protein concentration was quantified using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay (15 µg loaded per well). Protein samples were resuspended in Laemmli buffer and separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Antibodies used included anti–β-actin 13E5 (1:5,000; Cell Signaling Technology), anti–E-cadherin HECD-1 (1:200; Abcam), anti–DDR1 C-20 (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-KIFC1 (HSET; 1:500; Bethyl Laboratories), anti-Mad2 (1:500; Bethyl Laboratories), anti-RhoE (1:100; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-p190 (1:250; BD Biosciences), anti–STARD8 E-2 (DLC3; 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti–N-cadherin (1:500; BD Biosciences), anti–Vimentin RV202 (1:500; BD Biosciences), anti-ERM (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology), anti–pMLC T18/S19 (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti–pDDR1 Tyr513 (1:100; Origene). Western blots were developed using a SRX-101A Konica Minolta and scanned.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblotting of Dendritic Cell Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
106 wt and hem1−/− DCs were spun down and lysed in 50 µl 1× lysis buffer (1 ml 10× radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, New England Biolabs; 9 ml H2O, 1 tablet PhosStop, and 1 tablet protease inhibitor mini, both Merck). Lysates were spun at full speed for 10 min at 4°C and supernatants were transferred to new tubes. Equal volumes of 2× loading buffer (4× lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS) buffer, 10× sample-reducing agent) were added. Two lanes were run for each WT or hem1−/− sample. Per lane, 15 µl were denatured at 99°C for 5 min. Samples were loaded on gels (NuPage 4–12% Bis-Tris Protein gels, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and run with 180 V. After protein transfer, membranes were cut in a way to allow for separate incubation with anti-ERM (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, #3142), anti-pERM (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, #3141), and anti-GAPDH (1:10,000; Abcam, ab125247) antibodies. Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in 1× TBS with Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 1 h at RT, followed by incubation with the respective antibodies overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed three times for 10 min with 1× TBS-T and then incubated with HRP-coupled secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT. Membranes were washed again three times with 1× TBS-T, incubated with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and imaged on an Amersham imager 600 (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!