The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sorvall rc 5c plus

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Sorvall RC-5C Plus is a high-speed centrifuge designed for a wide range of laboratory applications. It offers a maximum speed of 20,000 rpm and a maximum RCF of 48,400 x g. The centrifuge is equipped with an advanced, programmable control system that allows users to set and monitor various parameters, including speed, time, and temperature.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using sorvall rc 5c plus

1

Quantifying Myoglobin Redox Forms in Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was carried out as described by Kernberger-Fischer et al. [18 (link)] with one modification. Briefly, 7 ml phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4) was added to 3 g frozen meat sample and homogenized on ice for 1 min at 30,000 rpm with a Polytron PT 2500 homogenizer (Kinematica GmbH, Luzern, Switzerland). Subsequently, samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 35,000x g and 4°C (Sorvall RC 5 C Plus, Thermo Scientific Langenselbold, Germany) and the supernatant was converted into semi-micro cuvettes for analysis with a spectrophotometer (Evolution 201-UV–VIS-Spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific) at 525, 503, 557 and 582 nm. The equations modified by Tang et al. [19 (link)] were used to quantify the amounts of the myoglobin redox forms oxymyoglobin (OxyMb), metmyoglobin (MetMb) and deoxymyoglobin (DeoMb).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Surfactant-Stabilized SWNT Dispersion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surfactant stock solutions (0.02 %w/v) were prepared in deionized water (resistivity ~18.2 MΩ-cm) with each surfactant. SWNTs were added to surfactant stock (50 mL) to yield 105±5 mg/L initial concentration; i.e., a SWNT:surfactant ratio of 1:2. The solution was placed in an ice bath and then subjected to tip sonication (using a tapered 3.2 mm microtip horn and Misonix S-4000 sonicator; Misonix Inc., Farmingdale, NY) for 30 min (at 50 amplitudes). The sonication was performed in the ice bath to keep the temperature constant. An average energy input of 45±5 kJ was maintained for all samples. The dispersion was allowed to quiescently stand for 24 h and then subjected to centrifugation for 1 h at ~10,900 × g (Sorvall RC 5C plus, Thermo-Fisher, MA, USA). The supernatant was decanted to obtain stable surfactant-modified SWNT suspension, which served as stock for all subsequent measurements. The mass concentration of SWNTs solution at each stage, (i.e., right after sonication, after 24 h equilibration period, and upon centrifugation, as listed in Table S2) was measured with UV-Vis (Agilent 8453) spectroscopy at 570 nm and 655 nm wavelengths for SG65 and SG76, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Mango Peel Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mango peel powder was mixed with distilled water in a ratio 1:6 (m/V). The first experiment was performed to select an ultrasound-assisted extraction time. Samples were treated at 25 °C for 15, 30 and 45 min in an ultrasonic bath (model DT 255H; Bandelin Electronic, Berlin, Germany) at a constant frequency of 50 kHz and power of 160 W. The most effective ultrasound-assisted extraction time from prior studies was selected. Next, the extraction by ultrasound combined with stirring for 15, 30 and 45 min at room temperature was further investigated. The homogenate was centrifuged (Sorvall RC–5C Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Willmington, DE, USA) at 10 000×g and 25 °C for 30 min. Then the total phenolic content of samples was evaluated as described below. Concentrations of all tested mango peel extracts were expressed as equivalent mass (in g, on dry mass basis) of mango peel per mL of solvent (distilled water).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized Biomass Production Media

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The growth medium contained (g L−1): 10.0 yeast extract (Bacto USA), 15.0 nutrient broth (Merck, Germany) and 5.0 ammonium sulfate (Sigma Aldrich, Germany). The stock inoculum was aseptically introduced into this medium at a concentration of 3% (v/v) and incubated at 30 °C, 250 rpm for 24 h in a shaker incubator (Daihan LabTech®, Korea). Cell biomass was harvested at 4 °C, 9000 × g for 10 min using low temperature centrifuge (Sorvall RC-5C Plus, Thermo Scientific Germany). The harvested biomass was then used to seed the minimal medium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation of hNK1-CHO Cell Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hNK1-CHO cells were cloned locally and grown in a humidified CO2 (5%) atmosphere at 37 °C in a Forma Scientific incubator (Thermo Forma, Series II Water Jacketed) in a Dulbecco’s DMEM-F12 50:50 medium (Corning Cellgro) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Life Technologies) and 1× PenStrep solution (Gibco, Life Technologies). Confluent cell monolayers were harvested with 1× Dulbecco’s PBS containing 5 mM EDTA. Cells were centrifuged in a Sorvall ST 16R centrifuge (ThermoScientific) at 1500 rpm for 3 min. The supernatants were aspirated and the remaining pellets were placed at −80 °C. On the day of the experiments, cell pellets were thawed and homogenized with a Teflon-glass tissue homogenizer in ice-cold 50 mMTris-HCl (pH 7.4) buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2. The membrane fractions were collected by centrifugation in a Sorvall RC 5C Plus (ThermoScientific) at 13 000 rpm for 25 min at 4 °C and the resulting pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2 buffer. Protein contents of the pellet suspensions were determined by the BCA method (Bio-Rad, Bio-Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Standardized Brain Tissue Prep Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Guinea pig brains and rat brains were commercially available (Harlan‐Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany). Homogenizers: Elvehjem Potter (B. Braun Biotech International, Melsungen, Germany) and Soniprep® 150 (MSE, London, UK). Centrifuges: Cooling centrifuge model Eppendorf 5427R (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and High‐speed cooling centrifuge model Sorvall® RC‐5 C plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Langenselbold, Germany). Multiplates: standard 96 well multiplates (Diagonal, Muenster, Germany). Shaker: self‐made device with adjustable temperature and tumbling speed (scientific workshop of the institute). Harvester: MicroBeta® FilterMate 96 Harvester. Filter: Printed Filtermat Typ A and B. Scintillator: Meltilex® (Typ A or B) solid state scintillator. Scintillation analyzer: MicroBeta® Trilux (all Perkin Elmer LAS, Rodgau‐Jügesheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction and Purification of PHA Biopolymer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The accumulated PHA was extracted according to previously reported literature (Gumel et al., 2012a (link)). PHA accumulated biomass was harvested by centrifugation at 9000 × g (Sorvall RC-5C Plus, Thermo Scientific Germany) for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded while 10% (v/v) n-hexane in distilled water was used to wash the pellets three times to remove residual fatty acids. Later, the biomass was dried in vacuo in the presence of phosphorus pentaoxide using vacuum drying oven VC-6020 (Constance, Germany) at 45 °C for 24 h. About 10% (w/v) dried biomass was suspended in chloroform and refluxed at 80 °C for 4 h, after which Buchner flask equipped with 0.2 μm PTFE filter paper was used to filter the reflux mixture under vacuum. The filtrate was concentrated in rotary evaporator (Yamato RE300; Yamato, Japan) at 4 °C under reduced pressure until about 5% of the original volume. The polymer was then precipitated in cold methanol while being gently stirred. The PHA solution was allowed to settle under gravity for 24 h after which the supernatant was decanted leaving behind a layer of PHA film. This film was air-dried before the purification steps were repeated by chloroform dissolution and methanol extraction. The PHA film was dried in vacuo prior to characterization and quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!