The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Porapak q column

Manufactured by Merck Group

The Porapak Q column is a type of gas chromatography (GC) column used for the separation and analysis of organic compounds. It is composed of a porous polymer material that provides a large surface area for adsorption and separation of various analytes. The Porapak Q column can be used for a wide range of applications, including the analysis of volatile organic compounds, alcohols, and other organic substances.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using porapak q column

1

Methane, Ethanol, and Biomass Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methane, ethanol and biomass concentrations were monitored over time and the yields were calculating by plotting the produced biomass versus the consumed substrate and obtaining the slope (before reaching limitation by nitrogen). Methane was added to cultures by injection through the rubber stopper to a headspace concentration of 10% v/v, and monitored by gas chromatography (GC) [8 (link)]. The initial concentration of ethanol in the medium was 4 mM. Its concentration was quantified by GC, by comparison with standards prepared in water. Culture medium (1 ml) was centrifuged (16,000 × g, 10 min) and 3 μl of the supernatant injected into an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph fitted with an HP-PLOT Q column (30 m × 530 μm, Agilent, catalogue number 19095P-QO4). Biomass was calculated from optical density (OD540), measured with a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, based on the conversion factor 1 OD ml unit = 0.25 mg dry weight. Methane was measured using a Porapak Q column (Supelco).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Alkane Gases in Seep Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alkane (C1–C3) concentrations in the gas samples at seep sites were quantified using a gas chromatograph (GC). From bubbles, 5 ml gas was taken into a syringe and injected into 30 ml pre-sealed serum vial. These vials were analysed in the lab using an Agilent 7820A GC equipped with a Porapak Q column (Supelco) coupled to a flame ionisation detector (FID) to measure methane, ethane and propane concentrations as previously described [46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Headspace Gas Chromatography Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of CH4 and CH3Cl in the headspace of each bottle were collected by the drainage method, and 1 mL of the gas was measured by GC (HP-Agilent) with a flame ionization detector operated at 300°C with N2 as carrier gas (1.3 mL min−1) within 10 h after sampling. For CH4 measurement, the column HP-PLOT/Q (Agilent, mesh 80/100) was 3.2 m and 1/8 in. in diameter, and detection was performed at 40°C (18 (link)). The CH4 peak appeared at 2.72 ± 0.1 min, and no CH3Cl peak occurred under this detection condition. Moreover, CH3Cl was measured using a Porapak-Q column (Supelco) at 130°C (63 (link)). The peak of CH3Cl appeared at 2.10 ± 0.1 min, and no CH4 peak appeared under this detection. The minimal limits of CH4 detection and CH3Cl detection by GC were 0.05 nmol and 0.14 nmol, respectively (i.e., the upper 95% confidence interval of the negative background).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Methane and Volatile Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gasses were sampled with a Pressure-Lok syringe (VICI, Houston, TX, United States); and the concentration of methane and hydrogen was determined using a gas chromatograph (7890A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States) equipped with an 80/100-mesh Porapak Q column (Supelco; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) and a thermal conductivity detector (Liu et al., 2014 (link)). The unit of CH4 concentration was converted from partial pressure in headspace to mmol L–1 in liquid medium by using Avogadro’s law. Liquid samples (0.5 ml) were collected periodically with a sterile syringe, centrifuged, and filtered through 0.22-μm filters. Concentrations of butyrate and acetate in culture medium were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with a ZORBAX SB-Aq C18 organic acid column (250 by 4.6 mm; particle size 5 μm; Agilent) at a flow rate of 0.8 ml min–1. The UV absorbance detector was set at 210 nm (Zhang et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Methanotrophic Growth with Lanthanum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Modified diluted nitrate mineral salt (DNMS) medium [49 (link)] supplemented with 5 μM lanthanum (LaCl3) was used as a growth medium in 120 ml serum vials (with 20 ml culture volume), with substrate gas as the only source of C and energy. Methane (20%), ethane (10%) and propane (10%), individually or in a mixture at varying concentrations, were injected (percentage v/v in headspace) in sealed serum vials as C substrates. The growth of liquid cultures was monitored by measuring the optical density at 540 nm. Concentrations of substrate gases in the cultures were quantified using a gas chromatograph (GC) using an Agilent 7820A GC equipped with a Porapak Q column (Supelco) coupled to a flame ionisation detector (FID) to measure methane, ethane and propane concentrations as previously described [49 (link)]. Comparison of growth of Methylocella sp. PC4 with and without lanthanum (Fig. 6) was performed in 50 ml polypropylene falcon tubes (with 15 ml culture volume) to avoid any contamination of lanthanides from glassware. As many methanotrophs do not store well frozen [113 ], cultures were maintained on plates or in liquid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring In-Vitro Digestibility and Gas Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the incubation, total pressure of each bottle was measured with a Druck DPI 104-IS Pressure Gauge (GE Measurements; Billerica, MA) and a subsample of 10 mL of gas was collected for CH4 and CO2 analysis. The concentration of both gases were determined in a Gow Mac thermal conductivity series 580 gas chromatography (Gow Mac Instrument, Bridgewater, NJ) equipped with a Porapak Q column (Supelco, 60 °C, 30 mL/min of helium 99.99% carrier gas). The final GP volumes were corrected by subtracting the final GP of the blank bottles.
The remaining fermented media was used for the determination of in vitro true OM digestibility. The media was dried in a ventilated oven at 55 °C, then NDF was analyzed according to Mertens (2002) (link) and adapted to the Ankom200 Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology). The in vitro true OM digestibility was calculated according to Goering and Van Soest (1970) : in vitro true OM digestibility (%) = (iOM – rNDF)/(iOM), in which iOM was the incubated OM and rNDF the residual NDF after 48 h of incubation minus the NDF content in the blank bottles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!