The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

274 protocols using stata statistical software release 15

1

Biochemical Analysis of Treatment Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The findings were expressed as mean and standard deviations (SD). The differences between groups regarding biochemical factors were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. All statistical analyses were performed with STATA Statistical Software Release 15.0 (StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15; StataCorp LLC., College Station, TX). The p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Diabetic Retinopathy Incidence and Progression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Incidence and progression estimates were calculated, with participants having DR at Exam 2 excluded from the estimate of incidence, but only these individuals contributed to analyses of progression and improvement. Comparisons of traditionally associated risk factors, as listed in Table 1, with incident DR outcomes were interrogated by race/ethnic group using chi-square (for categorical variables) and independent sample t-tests (for continuous variables). Univariate Poisson regression models were performed to examine associations, with significant factors associated with DR incidence or progression (p<0.05), along with age, gender and race/ethnicity, being included in a multivariable model. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA statistical software: release 15.0 (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Musculoskeletal Pain Epidemiology and Associations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analysed data in Stata Statistical Software Release 15.0 (StataCorp LP) and report the study in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology recommendations (Vandenbroucke et al., 2014 (link)). We calculated prevalence of any MSK pain, regional and widespread pain for the total sample and stratified by the two age bands recruited (65–74 and 75 years and over) and sex. Demographic and health‐related characteristics were described by any pain, by region and number of regions of MSK pain. We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models to estimate the association between regional and widespread pain and loneliness, social support and social engagement. Models were adjusted for the following covariates: age, sex (reference category: males), BMI, smoking status (reference category: never), living alone (reference category: living with others), education level (reference category: higher education), physical demands of occupation (reference category: very light/light), index of multiple deprivation (reference category: 20% least deprived), number of health conditions (reference category: 0), pain severity (reference category: no/slight pain) and mobility limitations (reference category: no/slight problems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of Serum AMH Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Software program SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The Pearson’s chi-square and Student’s t tests were applied to compare categorical and continuous parametric data, respectively. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare nonparametric continuous data, that is, serum AMH levels before and after surgery and the difference in AMH levels (pre- and 3-month post-surgery). P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The median difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference were calculated by Stata Statistical Software: Release 15.0 (College Station, TX, USA) and Hodges-Lehmann median methods. (https://www.real-statistics.com/non-parametric-tests/mann-whitney-test/mann-whitney-median-confidence-interval/)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients and Glucose-Lowering Therapies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Survival was calculated from the date of cancer diagnosis to the date of death or the end of follow-up (31 December 2018).
The chi-square test of independence was used to analyze the differences between groups. Univariate analyses using the Kaplan–Meier method examined the association of overall survival with age, gender, stage of disease, and glucose-lowering therapies. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to account for differences in cohort characteristics. The reference group was the sulfonylurea users group for all analyses. The threshold for statistical significance was set at the conventional level of α = 0.05, and 95% CIs for hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated.
All statistical analyses were carried out using STATA 15 statistical software (StataCorp. 2009. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15.0. College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cardiac Retransplantation Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software: Release 15.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex). Categoric variables were analyzed with the Fisher exact test. Normalized, continuous variables were reported as a mean AE standard deviation and analyzed with a Student t test. Non-normalized, continuous variables were reported as a median (interquartile range) and analyzed with a Mann-Whitney analysis. Mortality was reported as all-cause mortality. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Wilcoxon analyses. Time zero for survival analysis is the event of cardiac retransplantation, with continuous followup thereafter. Censoring occurred only in patients who were lost to follow-up or if the patient was alive at follow-up. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess preoperative risk factors for 30-day mortality and were reported as a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Modeling Preterm Birth and DEHP Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to fitting regression models, we log2-transformed ∑DEHP given its non-normality. We modeled the relation of a doubling of ∑DEHP with odds of preterm birth via logistic regression models, estimated using a robust Huber-White sandwich estimation of variance. We included as covariates maternal age (years), pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal education level (highest achieved: high school or less, any college/technical school, any graduate work), and maternal race (White, Black, Other/multiple race). We also included study site to account for systematic differences across sites and inherent correlation of observations within sites. For models applying the regression-based or covariate-adjusted standardization method, we additionally included z-scores of the measure(s) of dilution as an additional covariate. However, as a sensitivity analysis, we fitted models where we applied the covariate-adjusted standardization method but excluded the z-scores of the measure(s) of dilution, as a previously described variation of this general approach.17 (link)In regression analyses, we addressed missing covariate data (7% of sample) using multiple imputation by chained equations (50 imputed data sets). We performed all analyses using Stata v15.1 (StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Interventions for Falls and Fractures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences between baseline assessment and the 6-month follow-up were assessed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Comparison of the four main outcomes (falls risk, fracture risk, number of falls and fractures) between follow-up and baseline was performed using general estimating equations for ordinal responses (with logit link function) and for counts (with negative binomial link function). Association of other characteristics and interventions on the improvement in the outcome (classified as improved vs not improved) was compared using rank sum test or Fisher’s exact test. Change in scores between the adherent versus non-adherent groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test. All analyses were performed using Stata V.15.1 (StataCorp. 2017, Stata Statistical Software: Release 15, StataCorp LLC) and r (R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Treating Family Members in Medical Practice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nominal data were expressed as percentages, whereas medians with interquartile ranges were calculated for continuous variables. Responses were excluded if there were missing or apparent inconsistencies in them.
We conducted a chi-square test with field of practice (binary variable of hospital or clinic) as the independent variable, and the percentage of doctors who had treated family members or relatives as the outcome. In addition, we conducted a logistic regression analysis with the following factors: age, gender, physician’s geographic location, and presence of a doctor in the family. Age was classified into three groups: < 45 [7 (link)], 45–64, ≥ 65 years, and included in the model as a categorical variable.
As four variables, that is, age, gender, physician’s geographic location, and presence of a doctor in the family were included in the final model, and the percentage of “having experience in treating family members or relatives” was estimated to be 80% from previous studies, we calculated that we would require at least 250 responses for this study. All statistical analyses were conducted using StataCorp software (Stata Statistical Software, Release 15, College Station, TX, StataCorp LLC, 2017).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Authenticity of Emotional Expressions in Clinical Encounters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All survey responses were collected anonymously. Data was stored on Google Docs, which is stored securely, with data encrypted both in-transit and at-rest.22 We calculated a mean score for each authenticity question. A Shapiro-Wilk test demonstrated that our data was not normally distributed (P < .05). Thus, we performed a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test to compare the mean scores of authenticity for actively and passively intense emotional expressions and clinical experiences for each of 2 sessions. A P-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant (2 sided). Statistical analyses were performed using StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. Two study team members who are fluent in Japanese (EO, a female family medicine and palliative care physician and KO, a male emergency physician with experience in qualitative data analysis) independently reviewed free text responses which were written in Japanese to develop preliminary code list. Then, EO and KO reviewed the comments line by line to determine which codes fit the themes suggested by the data independently. Themes identified were reconciled and discussed until mutual agreements have been reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!