The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

166 protocols using originpro 2015

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of the sample data was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test (sample size less than 25) or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (sample size more than 25) for equal variances using F-test Origin Pro software (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA). Data are expressed as median (Q1–Q3) or mean ± SEM. Statistical significance between medians was calculated using the nonparametric ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test in Origin Pro 2015 (OriginLab Corp., USA). Statistical significance between means was calculated using parametric one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test in Origin Pro 2015 (OriginLab Corp., USA). Differences were considered as statistically significant at p < 0.05 (for parametric test) and Pu < 0.05 (for nonparametric test); n indicates the number of animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spatial Analysis of Cyanotoxin Concentrations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All summary statistics were conducted using Microsoft Excel and Origin Pro 2015 (Northampton, MA, USA). Nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests were conducted using Origin Pro 2015 to discern statistical significance between median cyanotoxin concentrations from manmade versus natural lakes. All mapping was conducted using ArcMap version 9.3 (ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA). All latitudes and longitudes were recorded in decimal degrees in NAD 83. All available data were used for analysis of detection frequency. Detections only were used to calculate summary statistics on concentrations to provide better context of representative exposure concentrations when toxins occurred. When multiple parameters were compared (e.g. toxins and cyanobacteria abundance), analysis was only conducted on samples that reported data for all parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Group measurements are expressed as mean ± SEM, n -number of animals. All data were checked for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and for equal variances using F-test Origin Pro 2015 (OriginLab Corp, USA). Statistical significance between means was calculated using paired t-test. In case of heterogeneous variances Welch's correction was performed and two-sample t-test was used in Origin Pro 2015 (OriginLab Corp, USA). The level of significance was set at p 6 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of the sample data was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test (sample size less than 25) or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (sample size more than 25) for equal variances using F-test Origin Pro software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Data are expressed as median (Q1–Q3) or mean ± SEM. Statistical significance between medians was calculated using nonparametric ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test in Origin Pro 2015 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Statistical significance between means was calculated using parametric One Way ANOVA or Two Ways ANOVA (for Morris water maze) followed by Bonferroni test or Student’s t-tests (two-tailed) in Origin Pro 2015 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Differences were considered as statistically significant at p < 0.05; n indicates the number of animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All calculations and statistical analyses were performed using OriginPro 2015. Data are represented as the mean ± standard error obtained from all measurements. Statistical significance was evaluated using two-sample Student’s t test for testing the equality of the means between two populations, assuming various numbers of samples analyzed (using OriginPro 2015). All statistical tests were two-sided and p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neuronal Synaptic Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using OriginPro2015. For comparison of the proportion of PSD95 and gephyrin, a t test with no assumption of equal variances was used against the hypothesis of the proportion of PSD95 being higher than 50%. For the comparison of the morphometric analysis, the Mann–Whitney test was used. Graphics were produced by using OriginPro 2015. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Equilibrium Unfolding and Refolding of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All proteins including hTyrCtr and OCA1B-related mutant variants were a subjected to equilibrium unfolding/refolding. Proteins were diluted to a final concentration of 1 μM in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 with urea concentrations from 0 to 8 M then incubated for 24h at RT. For equilibrium refolding experiments, 50 μM stocks of protein (final concentration 1 μM) in 8 M urea were incubated at RT for 5 h and then diluted with 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 to 0–8 M urea and incubated for 24h at RT. Samples were excited at 285 nm and emission spectra was recorded at 300–400 nm. Both unfolding and refolding was monitored using the emission 360/320 nm ratio, which was plotted vs the urea concentration. The experimental curves were fitted with a Boltzmann function using OriginPro 2015 (Origin Lab Corporation, MA). Each unfolding/refolding curves were averaged in triplicate and normalized to show a change of unfolding fraction u from 0 to 1. The dependence of the unfolding fraction u on the urea concentration was converted to a free energy plot using the following formula : ΔG =−RT ln(u/(1−u)). Finally, the values of Gibbs free energy changes at zero urea concentration (‘physiological’ conditions) were obtained by the linear approximation of experimental points using the Origin Pro 2015 software (Origin Lab Corporation, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Methylation and Expression Analysis of RbL2/p130

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis were performed with OriginPro 2015 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). For analysis transcript profiles, expression data of the target gene (Rbl2/p130) was normalized against internal control gene (β-actin). The correlation among different factors was assessed by Pearson Correlation Coefficient test. Depending on experiment, the statistical significance was determined on 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mann-Whitney test, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and specific comparisons were made by Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test. The values of P<0.05 were considered as significant. Statistical analysis enabled to investigate the correlation of methylation frequency and expression level of RbL2/p130 gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the data was performed using OriginPro® 2015 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA) using one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey test. In cases where P > 0.05, we reported no statistically significant difference between the two data sets in question.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as mean ± SD. The statistical analysis was performed by the Student’s t-test, using the statistical software OriginPro 2015. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!