The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Zorbax eclipse xdb c18 column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Germany, Japan, Italy

The Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of compounds. It features a silica-based stationary phase with C18 bonded ligands, which provides excellent retention and selectivity for a variety of sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

318 protocols using zorbax eclipse xdb c18 column

1

Quantitative Analysis of Fruit Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three randomly selected fruits were analyzed by HPLC to quantify the PA, anthocyanin, and soluble sugar contents as previously described (Guo et al., 2018). The HLPC was completed with the following columns: ZORBAX Eclipse XDB‐C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm; Agilent) at 30°C for detecting PAs; the ZORBAX Eclipse XDB‐C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm; Agilent) for detecting anthocyanins; and the Agilent Technologies 1,200 Series Sugar‐Pak™ column (6.5 × 300 mm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) for detecting soluble sugars. The analysis was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Anabaenopeptins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS system was composed of Agilent 1200 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and a QTRAP5500 tandem mass spectrometer. The compounds were separated in a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Gradient elution (0.6 mL·min–1) was performed with the same mobile phases as in the preparative analysis. The turbo ion spray operated at 550 °C; voltage, 5.5 kV; nebuliser gas pressure, 60 psi; curtain gas pressure, 20 psi. To determine the content of the samples, an IDA (information-dependent acquisition) mode was used, and ions within the m/z range 500–1250 and intensity higher than 5 × 105 cps were fragmented. The assessment of the relative content of APs in the extract was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). The following transitions were monitored: 807→402, 231, 120 for anabaenopeptin AP806Ne (m/z 807); 821→448, 248, 120 for AP820Ne (m/z 821); 835→448, 248, 120 for AP SA6 (m/z 835); and 837→448, 248, 120 for AP836Ne (m/z 837). The collision energy was 60 eV, and the dwell time was 100 msek.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Determination of Gallic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gallic acid phytochemical compound composition in each plant extract was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The compounds of gallic acid (Sigma-Aldich, Darmstadt, Germany) in plant extracts were optimized for detection by gradient HPLC systems with a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5429 μm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at ambient temperature. The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.5% glacial acetic acid (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B). The gradient steps were adjusted with modifications: 100% A, 0–20 min; 50% A, 20–30 min; 40% A, 30–35 min; 30% A, 35–40 min; 20% A, 40 min; post-time, 5 min before next injection. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the injection volume was 20 μL. A UV photodiode array detector (270 nm) was used to monitor the wavelength.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analytical Methods for Wine Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the performance of the proposed method with that of other analytical methods, certain OAs and PAs in the white and red wines (see preparation of different wines in Section 2.1.2.) were analyzed. Glycerol and tartaric acid were measured enzymatically and with a colorimetric method, respectively, on a Y15 enzymatic autoanalyzer (BioSystems S.A., Barcelona, Spain) using kits from BioSystems [33 (link)]. For PAs, p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid were determined with HPLC with an Agilent 1200 series liquid chromatograph (HPLC-diode array detection) using an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5-μm; Agilent Technologies) according to a modification of the method of [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LC-MS Analysis of Glycosylated Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS instrumentation consisted of an API 4000 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with Turboion Spray source coupled with an Agilent 1100 Liquid chromatograph (Santa Clara, CA). A Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 X 250 mm) was used (Agilent, Santa Clara) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Mobile phases A: 0.1% formic acid in water and B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile were used with an initial composition of 98:2 A:B held for 10 min followed by a linear gradient to 10:90 A:B over 30 min, and held for 5 min. The ion source was operated in positive ion mode with a source temperature of 650°C and voltage spray of 4500 V. The mass spectrometer was operated in full scan (150–600 amu), neutral loss of m/z 176, or product ion scan (m/z 230 and 246) modes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Analysis of Crude Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crude extracts were dissolved in ACN-H2O (8:2) and assessed by HPLC-DAD and UPLC-DAD-QTOF using modified chromatographic conditions from literature28 (link). For UPLC-DAD-QTOF, samples were ionized by ESI with a MicrOTOF Bruker Daltonics mass spectrometer (Milford MA, USA). Mass spectra were obtained in positive ionization mode and the following parameters were applied: capillary energy of 3.5 kV, nitrogen was used as nebulization, drying gas (5.5 bar and 10 L/h), and temperature drying time of 220 °C. UPLC conditions were carried out using the isocratic system: 0–18′ (60:40; A:B), 18–32′ (50:50; A:B), and 32–40′ (100% of B %), 0.3 mL.min−1 flow rate and detection at 245 nm (A-triethylammonium acetate buffer 35 mM, 0.2% v/v, pH 6.9; B-ACN); and an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column: 3.5 µ, 4.6 × 150 mm. For HPLC-DAD, the samples were analyzed with the same chromatographic conditions described above, except for the flow rate, which was 0.8 mL.min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Glycyrrhizin and Liquiritin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root ground powder (0.1 g) was weighed accurately and extracted with 15 mL of 67% methanol in an ultrasonic bath (250 W, 40 kHz) for 45 min. Extract solutions were cooled down and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter before detection. Glycyrrhizin and liquiritin were separated and detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Agilent-1200, Santa Clara, CA, USA) through an Agilent ZORBAX-Eclipse XDB-C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). Standard materials of glycyrrhizin (Batch No.110731) and liquiritin (Batch No. 11610) were purchased from the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products, China, to generate the calibration curve [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein, moisture, and ash content of the SJP, SJP-A, and SJP-C sample were measured in accordance with the AOAC standard methods (AOAC International, 2005 ). The total carbohydrate content was determined using the phenol–sulfuric acid method (Dubois et al., 1956 (link)). The uronic acid and sulfate group contents were determined using the m-hydroxydiphenyl (Blumenkrantz and Asboe-Hansen, 1973 (link)) and barium sulfate turbidimetric methods (Dodgson, 1961 (link)), respectively. The monosaccharide component was analyzed on an Agilent 1260 Infinity high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system coupled to a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 µm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples were acid-hydrolyzed using 2 mol/L of trifluoroacetic acid at 110°C for 6 h. Further derivatization and HPLC evaluation were conducted in accordance with methods proposed in a previous study (Fu et al., 2019 (link)). The MWs were measured using a TSKgel G4000PWXL column (7.8 mm × 300 mm × 10 μm, Tosoh Co., Ltd., Japan) equipped with a refractive index detector (G1362A; Agilent Technologies). Dextran standards of 1, 3.65, 5, 12, 21, and 80 kDa were used for calibration. The following experimental parameters were used: column temperature, 35°C; flow rate, 0.3 ml/min; and mobile phase, 10 mM of NaH2PO4 and 200 mM of NaNO3 dissolved in ultrapure water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UHPLC-HRMS Metabolite Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC–MS was performed on the Thermo Fisher Scientific Vanquish UHPLC system coupled with a Thermo Q Exactive HF hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer equipped with a HESI ion source. Metabolites were separated using a water−acetonitrile gradient on an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.8 μm) maintained at 40 °C (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid in water; solvent B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile). The A/B gradient started at 1% B for 3 min after injection and increased linearly to 100% B at 20 min, then 100% B for 5 min, and down to 1% B for 3 min at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1. MS parameters were as follows: spray voltage, 3.5 kV; capillary temperature, 380 °C; probe heater temperature, 400 °C; 60 sheath flow rate, 20 auxiliary flow rate, and one spare gas; S-lens RF level, 50; resolution, 240,000; AGC target, 3 × 106. The instrument was calibrated weekly with positive and negative ion calibration solutions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each sample was analysed in negative and positive ionization modes using an m/z range of 100 to 800. Data were collected using Thermo Fisher Scientific Xcalibur software (v.4.1.31.9) and quantified by integration in Excalibur Quan Browser (v.4.1.31.9).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural Characterization of Antimicrobial Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural determination of the antimicrobial compound was performed by spectroscopic techniques and literature comparison. The antimicrobial compound was analyzed by thin-layer chromatography on a silica 60 plates (Merck, Germany) with chloroform-acetic acid-ethanol at 95:5:2.5 (v/v) as the mobile phase, followed by spraying of an iron reagent (0.1 M FeCl3 in 0.1 M HCl). LC-MS was performed with an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system coupled to Agilent 6520 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF mass spectrometer (dual ESI source) equipped with an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column. The ultraviolet/visible absorption spectrum was recorded with the photodiode array detector equipped with the above-mentioned HPLC. The mobile phase was composed of water (A, 0.5% formic acid) and acetonitrile (B, 0.5% formic acid), the gradient program of which was 0–12.00 min 90% A and 10% B and 12.00–15.00 min 100% B. The follow rate of the mobile phase was 0.3 ml/min, and the column temperature was set to 25°C. The injection volume was 10 μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!