The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using accupaque 350

1

Contrast-Enhanced SDCT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT examination using a 64-section SDCT system (IQon Spectral CT, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The scan covered the patient’s head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The detailed acquisition parameters were as follows: tube voltage, 120 kVp; helical pitch, 0.8; rotation time, 0.5 s; and detector collimation at 64 × 0.625 mm2. The patients received an injection of a non-ionic iodinated contrast agent (350 mg/mL, iohexol, Accupaque 350, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA) with a dose of 1.35 mL/kg at a rate of 3 mL/s followed by a 30 mL saline flush using a powered syringe (OptiVantage, Medtronic Covidien, Shanghai, China). The portal venous phase was acquired 60 s after contrast agent injection completion. The conventional images were reconstructed using the iDose algorithm, and the spectral images were reconstructed using the spectral reconstruction algorithm from the spectral-based imaging (SBI) data in a vendor-provided workstation (IntelliSpace Portal v9, Philips Healthcare) with a thickness of 1 mm, a section increment of 1 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dual-Energy CT Imaging for Chest Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent contrast-enhanced DECT of the chest with or without additional scans of the head and / or abdomen. All DECT examinations were performed in supine position during end-inspiratory hold using a second generation dual-source CT scanner (Siemens Somatom Definition Flash; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The contrast medium was iohexol (Accupaque 350, GE Healthcare Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany) administered at a flow rate of 3–5 mL/s. 70 mL were injected for examinations of the chest only. 100 mL were injected for chest examinations in combination with other body regions. The scan was triggered with a bolus-tracking technique. For this, a region of interest (ROI) was placed into the main pulmonary artery. The scan started with a scan delay of 5 seconds after reaching a threshold of 100 Hounsfield Units (HU). All DECT were performed with 100 kVp (tube A) and 140 kVp with tin filter (tube B) with a quality reference mA setting of 150 mA (for tube A) using the combined angular and longitudinal automatic tube current modulation technique (CARE Dose 4D, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dual-Energy CT Reconstruction Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT scans were performed using a second-generation dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). A standard single-energy protocol (120 kV) was applied in all patients. Pitch was always set from 0.45 to 0.9, and collimation was 64 × 0.6 mm. When contrast medium was clinically indicated (80–120 mL of Accupaque 350, GE Healthcare, Opfikon, Switzerland) were injected at a flow rate of 3 mL/s and flushed out by 40 mL of saline solution at a flow rate of 3 mL/s. Five cases of injected CT were carried out to exclude collection in prostheses surrounding tissues. All CT scans were performed in single energy acquisition (X ray tube current: 300 mAs) with utilization of automatic exposure control (Care dose, Siemens; Forchheim, Germany). The raw datasets were then reconstructed with FBP and ADMIRE level 3 with and without iMAR (the level used in our department with reference to literature ).[13 (link)] Hip prosthesis-dedicated iMAR was always chosen (the system proposes different iMAR algorithms, each dedicated to a specific clinical question). We used a soft tissue kernel (B/I41f medium). The slice thickness interval was 1.5 mm. Four different reconstructed series were thus obtained for every patient: FBP, FBP+iMAR, ADMIRE, and ADMIRE+iMAR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multidetector CT Angiography of Carotid, Aortic, and Iliac Arteries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT imaging acquisitions were performed on a 256-row multidetector CT system (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare), with patients lying on their back, arms raised above their head, in a single breath-hold. Cardiac ECG-gated non-contrast images were first acquired to compute the aortic valve calcium score (these series were not analyzed as part of this study). In a second step, ECG-gated CT angiography of the carotid arteries, aorta, and iliac arteries was performed in the craniocaudal direction, following 100 mL of 350 mg/mL of iodinated contrast medium (Accupaque 350, GE Healthcare) injected into an antecubital vein (on the right side whenever possible). Images were analyzed by two radiologists, with any disagreement resolved by consensus or with the help of a third senior radiologist. Interrater variability for superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis assessment has been evaluated previously (7 (link)). Data were prospectively collected in a dedicated file.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Arterial Contrast-Enhanced CT for IPAL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The outcome was the presence of an IPAL related to the PRI. Every patient had a total body or thoraco-abdominal CT scan including contrast enhanced arterial sequences as part of the emergency management. Arterial sequences were obtained after intra-venous injection of 120 ml of Accupaque™ 350 (Iohexol, GE Healthcare AG, Opfikon, Switzerland) diluted with sodium chloride. A region of interest (ROI) was placed on the aorta to exactly define the arterial phase, which was followed by venous series in all cases, and sometimes by late acquisitions if deemed necessary. Some patients additionally had angiography and embolization if needed. All the vascular images were reviewed by one of the authors (SB, board-certified radiologist), and every IPAL was noted and precisely described in terms of localization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DECT Imaging of Portal Venous Phase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were examined on a commercially available spectral detector DECT scanner (IQon Spectral CT, Philips Healthcare) in a head first, supine position. All scans were performed after intravenous administration of 100 ml iodine-based contrast agent with a flow rate of 3.0 ml/s (Accupaque 350, GE Healthcare). Contrast administration was followed by a saline flush of 30 ml. Bolus tracking in the descending thoracic aorta indicated portal venous phase with a delay of 50 s after surpassing a threshold of 150 HU. Tube voltage was 120 kV, the tube current was modulated by DoseRight 3D-DOM (Philips Healthcare). The collimation was 64 × 0.625 mm and the pitch 0.671.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CT Imaging Protocol for Acute and Chronic Lung Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CTs were acquired on two scanners (128-slice Somatom Definition AS, 128-slice Definition FLASH, both Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The CT protocol was as follows: automatic tube voltage selection with a reference tube voltage of 120 kV, automatic tube current modulation with a reference mAs between 20 – 110, primary slice thickness 0.6 mm, multiplanar reformations (MPR) in the axial plane with a slice thickness of 1 mm in lung kernel and soft tissue kernel, sagittal and coronal MPRs with a slice thickness of 1 mm in lung kernel. As for acute phase scans, intravenous contrast material was administered according to the individual patient’s clinical situation. In total, 59 % (17/29) of acute phase scans were contrast enhanced and 41 % (12/29) non-enhanced. As for chronic phase scans application of intravenous contrast material depended on the anticoagulation status: CT was performed without intravenous contrast in case the patient was anticoagulated and with contrast if the patient was not anticoagulated. In total, 48 % (14/29) of chronic phase scans were contrast enhanced and 52 % (15/29) non-enhanced. As for the contrast enhanced scans, Iohexal (Accupaque 350, GE Healthcare) was administered in a weight-adapted dose, but not more than 70 ml. Flow rate was 3 or 4 ml/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Abdominal CT Imaging with Contrast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CT scanners used for imaging were a Canon Aquilion 64 (64 slice), an Aquilion Prime (80 slice), an Aquilion One (320 slice) (Canon Medical Systems, Ōtawara, Japan), and a GE Lightspeed VCT (GEL) scanner. Iodine-containing contrast agents such as Accupaque 350 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Ill, USA) and Ultravist 370 (Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany) were used in weight-adapted doses. The standard examination algorithm consisted of an initial arterial examination of the upper abdomen 40 s after the start of the machine contrast injection and a subsequent venous phase of the abdomen and pelvis 120 s after contrast injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Micro-CT Imaging of Spinal Cord Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spinal cords (n = 4 for each group) were contrasted prior to scanning with incubation in Accupaque-350 (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) diluted 1:2 in PBS for 48 h. The spinal cords were then placed on 2 mm thick and 4 mm wide extruded polystyrene boards (XPS) and fixed using parafilm. The mounted spinal cords were placed upright and evenly spaced around the inner wall of a cylindrical sample holder with 19 mm diameter and held in place with pieces of XPS boards. Up to four spinal cord samples were scanned at the same time. Scans were performed at 70 kVp with 85 μA and a 0.5 mm Al Filter. A total of 3,400 projections/180° were integrated 4 times for 650 ms and averaged. The scans were reconstructed to an isotropic resolution of 6 μm. Approximately 21 mm of spinal length was scanned with the lesion epicenter positioned in the center of the scan.
The scans were converted to DICOM slices and evaluated using Fiji (ImageJ v1.53a; Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). The spinal cords were rotated and aligned on the Z-Axis of the image using the rotate function of TransformJ (version 2016/01/09). The images were cropped to the XY extent of the spinal cord and in the Z direction to at least 5 mm above and below the lesion epicenter. Due to damage during tissue manipulation, a rat of the sham group was excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detailed Skin Toxicity Assessment in Veterinary Oncology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The (veterinary) VRTOG scoring system is not very detailed and ranges from 0 to 3, hence 3 being the most severe toxicity such as necrosis of skin or bone, or spontaneous fractures. In addition to the VRTOG toxicity criteria for cats (Supplementary Table S1A), adverse effects in both species were assessed along a detailed skin toxicity score, as prior described (6, 19 (link)). Raw data available in open repository: (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/6078697).
Tumor response was required to last for at least 21 days and noted in a modified version in adherence to RECIST; ref. 20 (link)). In case of suspected or present osteoradionecrosis a standard CT scan of the tumor patient was performed with a Brilliance CT16-slice (Philips Health Care Ltd.). Helical CT scans of the head were obtained before and 90 seconds after intravenous administration of a bolus of water-soluble iodinated contrast medium ACCUPAQUE™ 350 (GE Healthcare AG) at a dose of 700 mg/kg. The CT protocol included two reconstruction algorithms, medium frequency for soft tissue and high frequency for bone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!