The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sequencher version 4

Manufactured by Gene Codes
Sourced in United States

Sequencher version 4.8 is a DNA sequence assembly and analysis software. It provides core functionalities for aligning and comparing DNA sequences.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

43 protocols using sequencher version 4

1

Single-Genome Sequencing of HIV-1 and HCV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNA was extracted from plasma using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California) and reverse transcribed by SuperScript III (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Full-length HIV-1 gp160 or gp41 and 5′half HCV genome sequences ranging from the complete half genome to a >1,000 nucleotide amplicon were amplified by nested PCR from cDNA (primers in Table S1). SGS was carried out as previously described[5 (link), 9 (link)]; PCR products were sequenced by using BigDye Terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA)and edited using Sequencher, version 4.7 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). All sequences were aligned using Gene Cutter (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/) and adjusted manually with Bioedit software[30 ]. All sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KY345421-KY346492, KY405041-KY405825.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Targeted DNA/RNA Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected target fragments (prioritized based on phenotypic information and NGS data) were amplified from genomic DNA and cDNA, when available, using a standard PCR protocol. Primer sequences are available upon request. Amplicons were examined by applying 2.5 µl of each PCR reaction on a 1.3% agarose gel. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) according to the protocol and then sequenced with the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator v1.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the PCR primers as sequencing primers. The sequencing was performed on an ABI 3730 or ABI 3130xl Prism DNA Analyzers, and data analyzed with DNA Sequencing Analysis software, version 5.2 (Applied Biosystems) and Sequencher version 4.7 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted DNA Sequencing from FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One fresh 10-µm-thick section of FFPE tumor tissue per sample mounted on a glass slide was scraped off and used for DNA isolation. In most cases, whole genome amplification was performed with the REPLI-g FFPE kit (Qiagen) from FFPE tissue directly, without prior DNA purification, according to the manufacturer's instructions. For large specimens, the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen) was used for DNA extraction.
Routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of USP8 exon 14 was performed by using primers USP8_F and _R (Table 2) and the KAPA2G Fast Hot Start PCR kit (KapaBiosystems) following a step-down protocol. PCR products were verified by gel electrophoresis. For select cases, products were excised, and DNA was extracted by using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen). PCR purification and direct bidirectional Sanger sequencing were performed at the Genewiz Sequencing Service facility (Takeley, United Kingdom). Results were analyzed with Sequencher version 4.7 software (Genecodes).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Integrating Radish Genetic Maps Using EST Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To integrate a radish linkage map of EST-SNP markers with the linkage map of EST-SSR markers constructed by Shirasawa et al.,32 (link) 116 EST-SSR markers evenly distributed along the nine linkage groups were used to analyse polymorphism between the two parental lines and the EST-SSR markers having polymorphism were used for analysis of the F2 population. The PCR products were separated by 2% agarose gel or 8% polyacrylamide gel in 1× tris-borate-EDTA buffer.
The sequences of the unigenes located in the newly constructed linkage map and the map of Shirasawa et al.32 (link) were aligned to identify the same unigenes using the SEQUENCHER version 4.7 (Gene Codes Corporation, MI, USA) with the following parameters: window = 100, similarity = 90. Prior to construction of an integrated map, the orientation of each linkage group in the linkage map of Shirasawa et al.32 (link) was adjusted in accordance with the linkage map using the consensus SSR markers. Using a software MergeMap (http://138.23.178.42/mgmap/), these two linkage maps were integrated to be a consensus map.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Identification of Cercariae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Positive PCR reactions were purified using QiaQuick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and then Sanger sequenced, using a dilution (1 pmol) of the original PCR primers, on an Applied Biosystems 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences were assembled and edited manually using Sequencher version 4.5 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The identity of the cox1 and ITS sequences from the individual cercariae were confirmed by comparison to reference data [15 (link)] and also using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). Cox1 and ITS genetic profiles were assigned to each individual cercaria to confirm species identity. Cox1 sequence data were submitted to the GenBank database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Barcoding Arthropod Diversity Using COI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All sequences were verified by the NCBI Nucleotide Blast tool. Sequences from both directions were assembled and edited in Sequencher version 4.5 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and aligned in BioEdit version 7.0.9.0 [10 ] to create the COI matrix used for distance calculations. The COI matrix was translated into amino acids in MEGA7.0 [11 (link)] to check for stop codons. A neighbor-joining (NJ) tree based on the Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distances was constructed using MEGA7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates to generate support values for the nodes. The COI sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers ON834699–ON834714.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Characterization of ESBL Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA was extracted by DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The presence of ESBL genes was assessed by microarray analysis using the Check-MDR CT-101 (Check-Points, Wageningen, Netherlands) and characterized by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequence analysis as previously described (Dierikx et al., 2013 (link)). Sequence data were analyzed using Sequencher version 4.2 (Gene Codes Corporation, United States), and the sequences obtained were compared to ones deposited in GenBank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genotyping and Exome Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed with the OmniExp-12, v1.0 DNA Analysis BeadChip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SNP array data were subjected to homozygosity mapping with the Homozygosity Mapper software using only homozygous stretches of 15 alleles or longer [7 (link)]. Whole exome sequencing was accomplished according to the Nimblegen (Nimblegen v2.0, Roche Nimblegen, Indianapolis, IN) and the Extended Nextera Rapid-Capture Exome kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) protocols on an Illumina HiSeq 2000. Paired end sequence reads were aligned against the reference human genome (UCSC hg19). Exome data analysis was accomplished as previously described [8a (link), 8b (link)]. Variants were visually inspected with the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) [9 (link)]. Mutation confirmation was done with Sanger sequencing using an ABI BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit on an ABI 3730 sequencer. Sequence traces were analyzed via Sequencher (version 4.2; Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
Nucleotide and protein positions are based on the following accession numbers from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) SLC25A46, NM_138773 and NP_620128. Variant positions within the cDNA are numbered using the A of the translation initiation codon as position 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HLA-G 3'UTR Sequence Variation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleotide sequence variation of the HLA-G 3’UTR was evaluated by direct sequencing of a 343-bp fragment encompassing the genomic positions +2885 through to +3228, using PCR primers described by (Sizzano et al., 2012 (link)). Briefly, the 3’UTR region was amplified using HLAG_3UTRF (5’-TCACCCCTCACTGTGACTGA-3’) and HLAG_3UTRR (5’-CCCATCAA-TCTCTCTTGGAAA-3’) primers with the following thermocycling conditions: 95°C for 15 min followed by 30 cycles of 93°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min. A final extension step was carried out at 72°C for 10 min. Purified amplicons using the Invitek MSB Spin PCRapace cleanup kit (Berlin, Germany) were sequenced in both directions by capillary electrophoresis using an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) using the same PCR primers. The chromatograms obtained were analysed using Sequencher version 4.10.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) and sequences were aligned with an available HLA-G 3’UTR reference sequence (GenBank Accession number NG_029039.1) to identify known polymorphic positions (Castelli et al., 2010 (link)) and any other polymorphism that had not been previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Rubella Virus Sequence Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of the sequences were performed using Sequencher version 4.10.1 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI) and the genotypes determined by comparison with the 32 WHO rubella virus reference sequences.15 Sublineage reference sequences (rubella virus genetic grouping nomenclature proposed by Rivailler et al16) were retrieved from the GenBank using the BLAST program in NCBI. All study sequences, WHO reference sequences and sublineage reference sequences were aligned using the ClustalW alignment program within the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA7) software.17 The phylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura‐Nei model. The robustness of the nodes was tested with 1000 bootstrap replications and bootstrap support values greater than 75 are shown at the nodes. Rubella sequence data from this study were deposited in the GenBank with the accession numbers MK399390‐MK399397.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!