The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti fos

1

Immunoblotting Antibody Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-Centaurin alpha1 G-4 (ADAP1) (Santa Cruz, sc-390498) (1:1000); Anti-p65/NF-κB (Santa Cruz, sc-372) (1:4000); Anti-phos-ERK1/2 Thr202/Tyr204 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4370) (1:1000); Anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4696 or 4695) (1:2000); Anti-Fos (Cell Signaling Technology, 2250) (1:1000); Anti-Jun (Cell Signaling Technology, 9165) (1:1000); Anti-Flag M2 (Sigma, F31165) (1:10,000); Anti-PKCθ (Cell Signaling Technology, 13643) (1:5000); Anti-CD3ε (Cell Signaling Technology, 4443) (1:5000); Anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, 2118) (1:5000); hFAB Rhodamine anti-Actin (Bio-Rad, 12004166); (1:10,000); Anti-StrepTactin-HRP (Bio-Rad, 161-0381) (1:10,000); Anti-rabbit IRDye 800CW (Licor, 926-32211) (1:10,000); Anti-mouse IRDye 680CW (Licor, 925-68072) (1:10,000); Anti-mouse HRP (Cell Signaling Technology, 7076) (1:10,000); Anti-rabbit HRP (Cell Signaling Technology, 7074), (1:10,000); Anti-rat HRP (Abcam, ab97057) (1:10,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblotting Analysis of BACH2, FOS, and GAPDH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Harvested cells were lysed to perform immunoblotting assay as previously described.21 The antibodies were used for immunoblots: anti‐BACH2, anti‐FOS, and anti‐GAPDH (Cell Signaling). Immunoblotting was subjected to semiquantitative analysis using an ImageJ software. The relative expression of target proteins was normalized to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed Immunoblotting Antibody Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used according to manufacturer’s and/or published suggestions for immunoblotting: anti-β-Actin (Abcam), anti-Biotin (Cell Signaling), Streptavidin-AF647 (Invitrogen), anti-Arc (Gift from P. Worley, Johns Hopkins, verified against knockout), anti-Fos (Cell Signaling), anti-Npas4 (Gift from Y. Lin, MIT, verified against knockout), anti-PSD-95 (Pierce), anti-UBE3A (Sigma, verified against knockout), anti-Ubiquitin (FK2, Enzo), anti-S6 ribosomal subunit (Cell Signaling), anti-Transferrin receptor (Sigma), anti-β2 proteasome (Enzo), anti-α1–7 proteasome (Enzo). Standard secondary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling. We attempted to use antibodies that were verified by knockout controls in either our study, or by other groups. We only used antibodies that provided a signal at the appropriate molecular weight, and where minimal nonspecific bands were observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Quantification and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein quantification was performed using a BCA Kit. Protein lysates was subjected to SDS-PAGE and subsequently electro-transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore). Western blotting was performed as previously described57 (link), 58 (link). The primary antibodies used were as follows (company, catalog number): anti-ATF6 (Santa Cruz, sc-22799), anti-BIP (Cell Signaling Technology, 3177), anti-P16 (BD Bioscience, 550834), anti-P21 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2947), anti-Lamin B, anti-LAP2 (BD Bioscience, 611000), anti-FOS (Cell Signaling Technology, 2250), anti-Calreticulin (Abcam, ab2907), anti-Calnexin (Cell Signaling Technology, 2679), anti-Ero1Lα (Cell Signaling Technology, 3264), anti-IRE1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3294), anti-PDI (Cell Signaling Technology, 3501), anti-PERK (Cell Signaling Technology, 5683), anti-EMDM (Santa Cruz, sc-377394), anti-β-Actin (Santa Cruz, sc69879), anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, sc-25778), and anti-Flag (Sigma, F1804).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RIPK1 and MLKL Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitation of RIPK1 and MLKL was performed according to a previously described protocol [28] (link). Briefly, cells cultured in 10-cm dishes were lysed for 30 min on ice in lysis buffer containing 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 0.15 M NaCl, 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and protease inhibitors (Roche, Germany). The lysates were sonicated and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. One milligram of extracted protein in lysis buffer was incubated overnight with 10 µg rabbit anti-RIPK1 or anti-MLKL antibody followed by incubation with 20 µl Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen, USA) for 2 h at 4°C and three washes with lysis buffer. The beads were directly boiled in 1% SDS loading buffer for 5 min. Subcellular fractions, including nuclear, membrane and cytosolic fractions, were prepared using the proteoExtract sub-cellular proteome extraction kit (Calbiochem, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [27] (link), using the following antibodies: anti-caspase-9, anti-caspase-3, anti-Fos, anti-RIPK1, and anti-survivin antibodies from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA); anti-RIPK3 and anti-SMAC antibodies from Abcam (Cambridge, MA); anti-MLKL, anti-cytochrome C and anti-Bcl-2 antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DREADD-Mediated Neuronal Manipulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For control experiments presented in Figure 1, mice were euthanized 3 weeks following viral delivery. Hit sites were verified using a marker virus (AAV-CMV-Cas9-HA(18)).
Upon the completion of DREADD studies, mice were injected with CNO (1 mg/kg), sacrificed 2 h post-injection, and then perfused with 10% formalin. Brains were then removed and post-fixed in 10% formalin for 24 hr, before being moved to 30% sucrose for 24 hr. Brains were then sectioned as 30 μm thick free-floating sections. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent staining was performed using standard procedures using anti-FOS (1:1000, #2250, Cell Signaling Technology), GFP (1:1000, #1020, Aves Laboratories), and DSRed (1:1000, #632392, Clontech) antibodies. Images were collected on an Olympus BX51 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Formalin Perfusion for Viral Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For control experiments presented in Figure 1, mice were euthanized three weeks following viral delivery. Hit sites were verified using a marker virus (AAV-CMV-Cas9-HA( 18)).
Upon the completion of DREADD studies, mice were injected with CNO (1mg/kg), sacrificed two hours post-injection and then perfused with 10% formalin.
Brains were then removed and post-fixed in 10% formalin for 24 hours, before being moved to 30% sucrose for 24 hours. Brains were then sectioned as 30 m thick freefloating sections. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent staining was performed using standard procedures using anti-FOS (1:1000, #2250, Cell Signaling Technology), GFP (1:1000, #1020, Aves Laboratories) and DSRed (1:1000, #632392, Clontech) antibodies. Images were collected on an Olympus BX51 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!