The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using orbitrap fusion ms

1

Site-Specific O-Glycopeptide Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC–MS/MS site-specific O-glycopeptide analysis of mucin TRs was performed on EASY-nLC 1000 UHPLC interfaced via nanoSpray Flex ion source to an Orbitrap Fusion MS or EASY-nLC 1000 UHPLC interfaced via New Objectives ion source to an Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, the nLC was operated in a single analytical column set up using PicoFrit Emitters (New Objectives; inner diameterof 75 mm) packed in-house with Reprosil-Pure-AQ C18 phase (Dr Maisch; particle size of 1.9 mm, column length of 19–21 cm). Each sample was injected onto the column and eluted in gradients from 3 to 32% B for glycopeptides and 10 to 40% for released and labeled glycans in 45 min at 200 nl/min (solvent A, 100% H2O; solvent B, 100% ACN; both containing 0.1% [v/v] FA). A precursor MS1 scan (m/z 350–2000) of intact peptides was acquired in the Orbitrap at the nominal resolution setting of 120,000, followed by Orbitrap higher-energy collisional dissociation–MS2 and electron-transfer dissociation–MS2 at the nominal resolution setting of 60,000 of the five most abundant multiply charged precursors in the MS1 spectrum; a minimum MS1 signal threshold of 50,000 was used for triggering data-dependent fragmentation events. Targeted MS/MS analysis was performed by setting up a targeted MSn Scan Properties pane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chicken IgY Enrichment and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken IgY was enriched using Ligatrap Chicken IgY Purification Resin (LigaTrap Technologies). Then, 5μl of total chicken serum was used as starting material and the procedure was followed as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of IgY was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and proteomics using C18 nano LC coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis of Phaeobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Triplicate samples (see above) from each growth condition were digested with trypsin (Roche, Switzerland), extracted as previously described (63 (link), 64 (link)), and analyzed by nanoliquid chromatography (LC)–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) using an Ultimate 2000 LC system (Dionez-LC Packings) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). An LC separation of 60 min for exoproteomics and 120 min for cellular proteomics was performed on a 25-cm column before MS/MS analysis using settings as previously described (65 (link)). The recorded MS/MS spectra were processed using MaxQuant (v1.5.5.1) (66 (link)). Protein fold change was based on the label-free quantification method [see (66 (link))], using default parameters but selecting the “match-between-runs” function. MS spectra were searched against the Phaeobacter protein database (A3X963_9RHOB), and Perseus (v1.6.5.0. MPI of Biochemistry) was used for comparative proteomics analysis (67 (link)). Protein differences between conditions were identified using a two-sample t test. Comparisons were made between each condition and the Pi culture. Statistical analysis used false discovery rates of 0.01 and 0.05 and a minimal log2 fold change of 2. A protein had to be present in every replicate of at least one condition to be considered valid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Analysis of N-Linked Glycans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of the permethylated N-linked glycans was performed by MALDI-TOF-MS in the reflector positive ion mode using α-dihyroxybenzoic acid (DHBA, 20 mg/mL solution in 50% methanol) as a matrix. The spectrum was obtained by using a AB SCIEX TOF/TOF 5800 MADLI mass spectrometer system. The structural and quantitative analyses of N-linked glycan were performed on the Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a Nanospray Flex Ion Source for direct infusion at 0.5 μl/min flow rate. Samples were infused onto a 30 μm fused silica emitter (New Objective). The full MS spectra were obtained for quantification with 30 s data audition time and the MS/MS spectra were obtained for structural analysis of glycans with targeted mass listed by 2 Da stepwise increases from 500 to 2000 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Systematic Orbitrap MS Calibration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the TMT batches were analyzed on the same Orbitrap Fusion MS instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Between each individual TMT experiment, one blank was run, followed by analysis of a 15 peptide Retention Time Calibration (RTC) standard, to evaluate retention time drift. This was followed by analysis of an MCF10a total cell digest standard to evaluate peptide and protein identifications. The last step consisted of analysis of two blanks, one with an oscillating gradient and one with the gradient matching the samples to be run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Mass Spectrometry Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digested peptides were put in auto sampler vials and loaded into an Easy-nLC 1200 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Chromatographic separation was carried out in commercially packed C18 columns (Acclaim PepMap 2 mm, 100 Å, 75 mm, 15 cm; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were loaded in buffer A (5% of acetonitrile and 0.1% of formic acid) and eluted with a 1 h linear gradient from 5 to 30% of buffer B (80% of acetonitrile and 0.1% of formic acid). Three biological replicates were sequentially injected with two 15-min wash runs and a 1 h blank run alternated between distinct ‘treatments’. Mass spectra were acquired using a Top20 data-dependent method with an automatic switch between full MS and MS/MS (MS2) scans. The Orbitrap analyzer parameters for the full MS scan were resolution of 120,000 mass range of 350 to 1800 m/z, and AGC target of 4e5 ions, whereas those for MS2 spectra acquisition were resolution of 30,000, AGC target of 5e4 ions, an isolation window of 2 m/z and dynamic exclusion of 30 s. Column chromatographic performance was routinely monitored with intermittent injections of 50 fmol of a commercially available Bovine serum albumin (BSA) peptide mix (Waters Inc.), as well as evaluating double-wash runs for carryover peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Orbitrap and FT-ICR MS Analysis of DOM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Orbitrap Fusion MS
(Thermo Scientific,
USA) and a 9.4T Apex FT-ICR mass spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) were
used for the molecular composition analysis of DOM. Samples were infused
directly into the negative mode ESI sources at a speed of 180 μL/h.
The mass range for FT-ICR MS was m/z 200–800; detailed instrumental setting for FT-ICR MS is described
elsewhere.51 (link) For Orbitrap MS, the ranges
were m/z 150–800 for SRNOM
and 100–800 for SRFA. The instrument resolution mode was selected
as 500,000. The sampling duration was 2 min for each acquisition,
and the microscan was set at 3.37 (link),55 (link),58 (link) In the instrument parameter evaluation section, instrument parameters
such as ion spray voltage, sheath gas, aux gas, ion transfer tube
temperature, rf-lens, modified AGC target, and spectrums under different
parameters were acquired. Detailed instrument parameters are shown
in Table S1 (see the Supporting Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Proteomics Profiling of Disease Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Global proteomics analysis involved Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) isobaric labeling of peptides for the identification and relative quantitation of proteins by multiplexing the 50 discovery cohort participants (Fig. 1) using 11-plex TMT reagents (randomized into 5 sets). The samples were analyzed using a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion MS. A list of biomarker targets was compiled using statistical significance between DO and HV, DO and DF, DO and NDO, NDO and HV (Fig. 2b).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intact Protein MS Analysis of Drug-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were dissolved in 25 ammonium acetate at a concentration of 10 uM, the drugs dissolved DMSO were diluted by 25 ammonium acetate to 100 uM. Then proteins were incubated with an equal volume of the drugs.
The above-mixed solutions were then injected into Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Scientific) through direct injection. The MS was operated in intact protein mode. Data were analyzed with BioPharma Finder (Thermo Scientific) software (Marcoux et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MudPIT Analysis of S. feltiae ESPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Online 2D-nano LC/MS/MS was used to perform MudPIT mass spec analysis of S. feltiae ESPs. The mass spec apparatus consisted of a 2D nanoAcquity UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA) configured with an Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). LC solutions/fractionation and MS parameters were as previously described [5 (link)]. The raw mass spec data was processed/analyzed with the Proteome Discoverer 2.2 software (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) with the Sequest HT search engine running against the S. feltiae protein profile, steinernema_feltiae.PRJNA204661.WBPS11.protein.fa (Parasite.Wormbase.org). Duplicate genes were removed and only genes with FDR <5% were considered for further analysis. The raw mass spec data have been uploaded to the ProteomeXchange repository and can be accessed with the following links.
0 hr: ftp://massive.ucsd.edu/MSV0000829936 hr: ftp://massive.ucsd.edu/MSV000082997
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!