The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using lcq deca

1

Molecular Weight Determination of Tetrasaccharides and Disaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molecular weight conformation of synthesized compounds 1–4 (tetrasaccharides and disaccharides) was determined by the ESI-MS (Thermo LCQ-Deca). ESI-MS analysis was performed in the negative ion mode and with the following parameters: spray voltage at 3.0 kV, curved desolvation line temperature at 120 °C. The mass range was set at 300–1000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All NMR spectra were recorded on a
Varian spectrometer (500 MHz for 1H spectra and 125 MHz,
for 13C spectra). Proton and carbon chemical shifts are
reported in parts per million downfield from tetramethyl silane, TMS.
Mass spectra were recorded on Thermo LCQ-Deca ion trap mass instruments
(HR-MS). As for optical measurements, UV–vis measurements were
taken in a T80 + UV/vis spectrophotometer with quartz cuvettes in
the 200–2500 nm range (light path: 10 mm), and fluorescence
measurements were carried out utilizing a quartz cell with 10 mm path
length via an Agilent Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer
device at room temperature. During the fluorescence measurements,
the excitation wavelength was set as 640 nm; meanwhile, the slit width
was adjusted to constant at 5 nm (excitation)/10 nm (emission), and
the device voltage was adjusted to 600 V. Finally, the Horiba Jobin
Yvon SPEX Fluorolog 3-2iHR (France) instrument was used for recording
time-resolved fluorescence measurements in which the source of excitation
was NanoLED (France) which excited samples at 670 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Metal-Ybt

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analyses were conducted using a Shimadzu UFLC-equipped AB-Sciex 4000 QTrap operated in positive ion mode using a Turbo V ESI ion source and a Thermo LCQ Deca as previously described 53 . The samples were injected onto a Fused-core phenylhexyl column (Ascentis Express, Supelco) with a flow rate of 0.4ml min-1 and the following solvents: solvent A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid) and solvent B (90% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid (v/v)). The ion spray voltage was set to 5kV and the heater temperature was 500°C. The declustering potential, nebulizer gas (G1), auxiliary gas (G2) and collision energy were set at 110V, 40V, 35V and 35V, respectively. Metal-Ybt quantification was carried out by LC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring mode using known collision-induced dissociation fragmentations and Cu(II)-[13C21]Ybt or Fe(III)-[13C21]Ybt internal standards, and calculated as a ratio of metal-Ybt peak area over internal standard peak area as previously described 56 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometric analysis was performed on an ion trap mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source ESI (LCQ-DECA, Thermo Fischer Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The mass spectrometer was coupled online with a and autosampler (Thermo Fischer Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and a LC-pump (Surveyor MS Pump, Thermo Fischer Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). Samples were dissolved in methanol ((25 µg/µL) and 5µL were loaded onto a Waters Symmetry RP-C18 column (150 mm × 1 mm i.d., 100 Å, 3.5 µm). Separation was achieved thermosetting the column at 25 °C with a linear gradient of H2O + 1% FA and ACN + 1% FA at 50 μL/min. Elution was performed, increasing solvent B from 5% to 15% in 25 min, 25% in 40 min, 30% in 45 min, and 55% in 55 min. Full scan mass spectra were acquired in negative ion mode in the m/z range 150–2000. ESI ion source operated with 220 °C capillary temperature, 30 a.u. sheath gas, −3.5 kV source voltage and −18 V capillary voltage. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed by the data-dependent method with normalized collision energy of 30 a.u. and activation Q set as 0.250. Mass calibration was achieved with a standard mixture of caffeine (Mr 194.1 Da), MRFA peptide (Mr 524.6 Da), and Ultramark (Mr 1621 Da). Data acquisition and data analyses were performed with the Xcalibur v. 1.3 Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Direct Infusion Mass Spectrometry of Sulfated Oligosaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MS analyses were performed at a Thermo LCQ-Deca. Synthetic LMWH constructs and intermediates were directly diluted in 200 μl of 9:1 MeOH/H2O. A syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus) was used to introduce the sample by direct infusion (35 μl/min). Experiments were carried out in negative ionization mode with the electrospray source set to 5 KV and 275 °C. Sulfated oligosaccharide (1 μl) was diluted in a different working solution containing 200 μl of 70% acetonitrile and 10 mM imidazole. Experiments for sulfated oligosaccharides were carried out in negative ionization mode with the electrospray source set to 2 KV and 200 °C. The automatic gain control was set to 1 × 107 for full scan MS. The MS data was acquired and processed using Xcalibur 1.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lipid Profiling by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipid fractions were dried and resuspended in acidified methanol (0.1% formic acid). Mass spectrometry analyses were performed at the University of Florida Department of Chemistry Mass Spectrometry Services (Gainesville, FL). Accurate mass experiments were conducted using an Agilent 6220 electrospray ionization-time of flight (ESI/TOF) mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray DART source. ESI/MS/MS experiments were performed on a ThermoScientific LCQ Deca ion trap mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray source. Both devices were operated in positive ion mode. Optimal accurate mass determination conditions were as follows: injection rate 100 μl min−1, capillary voltage 4000 V, source temperature 350°C, and cone voltage 60 V. The TOF analyzer was scanned over a m/z range of 100–1000 with a 1 s integration time. Optimal conditions for MS/MS were: injection rate 5 μl min−1, spray voltage 4.0 kV, and capillary temperature 250°C, with nitrogen as the nebulizer gas (8 psi). Collision-induced dissociation was performed by isolating the m/z of interest and fragmenting at a collision energy required for ~50% beam reduction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

LC-MS Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analyses were conducted using a Shimadzu UFLC-equipped AB-Sciex 4000 QTrap operated in positive ion mode using the Turbo V ESI ion source and a Thermo LCQ Deca as previously described16 . The samples were injected onto a Fused-core phenylhexyl column (100 × 2 mm, 2.7-µm particle, Ascentis Express, Supelco) with a flow rate of 0.4 ml per min. The following gradient was used: Solvent A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid) was held constant at 98%, and solvent B (90% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid (v/v)) was held constant at 2% for 2 min, then solvent B was increased to 65% by 10 min and then to 98% by 12 min. The ion spray voltage was set to 5 kV. The heater temperature was 500 °C. The declustering potential, nebulizer gas (G1), auxiliary gas (G2) and collision energy were set at 110V, 40V, 35V and 35V, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Analytical Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were determined on a Perkin-Elmer 341 polarimeter at 20 °C. UV spectra were performed on a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer, and ECD spectra were performed on an Applied Photophysics Chirascan spectrometer. Infrared spectra (IR) were measured on a Bruker Tensor 37 infrared spectrophotometer. NMR experiments were carried out on a Bruker AM-400 spectrometer at the temperature thermostatically controlled at 25 °C. Exact mass measurements and molecular formulas were obtained from ESIMS and HR-ESI-MS using a Finnigan LCQ Deca and a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL spectrometers, respectively. Semi-preparative reversed-phase (RP) HPLC was performed with a YMC-pack ODS-A column (10 × 250 mm, S-5 μm) or a Phenomenex Lux cellulose-2 chiral column (10 × 250 mm, 5 μm) under Shimadzu LC-20 AT equipped with a SPD-M20A PDA detector. Column chromatography (CC) was performed on RP-C18 silica gel (S-50 μm, 12 nm, YMC Co., Ltd.), MCI gel (CHP20P, 75–150 μm, Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd.), Sephadex LH-20 gel (Amersham Biosciences), and silica gel (300–400 mesh, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Ltd.). For RP-HPLC and CC, the analytical grade solvents (Guangzhou Chemical Reagents Company, Ltd.) were employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Metal-Ybt

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS analyses were conducted using a Shimadzu UFLC-equipped AB-Sciex 4000 QTrap operated in positive ion mode using a Turbo V ESI ion source and a Thermo LCQ Deca as previously described 53 . The samples were injected onto a Fused-core phenylhexyl column (Ascentis Express, Supelco) with a flow rate of 0.4ml min-1 and the following solvents: solvent A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid) and solvent B (90% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid (v/v)). The ion spray voltage was set to 5kV and the heater temperature was 500°C. The declustering potential, nebulizer gas (G1), auxiliary gas (G2) and collision energy were set at 110V, 40V, 35V and 35V, respectively. Metal-Ybt quantification was carried out by LC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring mode using known collision-induced dissociation fragmentations and Cu(II)-[13C21]Ybt or Fe(III)-[13C21]Ybt internal standards, and calculated as a ratio of metal-Ybt peak area over internal standard peak area as previously described 56 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of aSL-C22:0 by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of aSL‐C22:013 was done with a Thermo LCQ Deca by the use of RP18 solid phase (150×2 mm, Phenomenex Luna) and solvents 1) methanol with 0.1 % formic acid and 2) water with 0.1 % formic acid as gradients. LC–MS analysis was done with a Shimadzu LC‐10‐AD HPLC system (Shimadzu Europe GmbH, Germany) connected to a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA). Molecules were identified by their native molecular masses after ESI (electrospray ionization) without collision. The results were consistent with previous reports.23, 39
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!