The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Na water immersionobjective

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The 20×/1 NA water-immersion objective from Zeiss is a high-performance optical lens designed for use in microscopy applications. It features a magnification of 20x and a numerical aperture (NA) of 1, which enables the collection of a large amount of light and the capture of high-resolution images. This objective is specifically designed for use with water-based samples, providing optimal performance when immersed in water or other aqueous media.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using na water immersionobjective

1

Hippocampal Immunostaining in Mild-to-Moderate AD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded (6-μm-thick) and free-floating (40-μm-thick) human hippocampal sections were obtained from the above mentioned paraformaldehyde-fixed tissue blocks, from n = 7 MAP participants with mild-to-moderate AD, as previously described [24 (link)]. Triple immunostaining procedures were as reported [23 (link),42 (link)]. We first evaluated the distribution patterns in the different immunostained slices to ensure antibody specificity and proper labeling of the proteins targeted. To this end, images from the entire hippocampal formation were acquired from the paraffin-embedded slices using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope equipped with epifluorescence module, a motorized stage and a 10x/0.30NA objective (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). For colocalization studies, the immunostained floating sections were imaged as reported [41 (link)] in a Zeiss confocal microscope equipped with a LSM 5 Pascal Module and a 63×/1.2NA water immersion objective (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). All appropriate positive and negative controls were included in every experimental run. Image processing for background subtraction, thresholding and colocalization analyses were performed in ImageJ 2.0 (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA) using built-in, unbiased algorithms [41 (link),43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative IHC and IF Assays in Rat Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) assays in rats subjected to memory tasks and controls were performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain tissue slides essentially as previously described [42 (link), 57 (link)]. Immunofluorescence (IF) assays on paraformaldehyde-fixed, free-floating brain tissue sections were performed as reported [37 (link), 41 (link)]. Briefly, brain tissue slabs from the HIP of n = 7 MAP participants with mild-to-moderate AD (NIA/Reagan = 3–2; Braak stages II-V), and rat brain hemispheres (−3.30 to −4.20 relative to bregma), were sliced coronally to a thickness of 40 μm. Antigens were retrieved at 80° C for 15 min in 20 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0. Brain sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor-488/555/647-conjugated primary antibodies overnight at 4° C. Sections were laid on gelatin-coated slides, and images were obtained using a LSM 5 Pascal Module with a 63×/1.2 N.A. water immersion objective (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Appropriate positive and negative controls were included in all experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence-based Aggregation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For intensity measurements, the C-terminal sGFP-labelled proteins were expressed. A 488 nm laser beam was focused in the sample volume using a 40×/1.2 NA water immersion objective (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The fluorescence of sGFP was measured through a 525/20 nm band pass filter, and the number of photons collected in 1 ms time bins (I(t)) was recorded. The proteins were diluted 10 times in buffer A and fluorescent traces were acquired in triplicated measurements of 30 s.
The fluorescent time-trace I(t) obtained shows the presence of intense bursts of fluorescence, with values well over the typical fluctuations of I(t). The presence of these bursts increases the standard deviation of the distribution. To compare the aggregation at different concentrations, we used the Brightness parameter, which is the standard deviation normalized by the average signal, as described previously [37 (link)]: B=SD2average
The final brightness parameters acquired for each αS represent averages of four independent measurements. Data was normalized against the brightness determined for sGFP across our working range of concentrations, and curve fitting was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.00 (La Jolla, CA, USA) for Windows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dual-Color Fluorescence Microscopy of WT α-Synuclein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids for WT α-synuclein and mutants C-terminally tagged with sGFP (4 nM) and mCherry (19 nM) were introduced in 6 μL lysate and co-expressed for 3 h 30 at 27 °C. The samples were diluted 11 times and fluorescence time traces were acquired for 60 seconds. Two lasers (488 nm and 561 nm) were focused in solution using a 40×/1.2 NA water immersion objective (Zeiss). Fluorescence was collected and separated using a 565 nm dichroic mirror; signal from sGFP (IG(t)) was passed through a 525/20 nm band pass filter, while fluorescence from mCherry (IC(t)) was filtered by a 580 nm long pass filter. The fluorescence of the two channels was recorded simultaneously in 1 ms time bins. Average and standard deviation for the distribution of fluorescence in the Cherry channel were calculated. For each event above average +3 SD, the ratio R was calculated as

where IC(t) is the intensity in the Cherry channel, C(t)> is the average intensity in the Cherry channel, IG(t) is the intensity in the GFP channel and G(t)> is the average intensity in the GFP channel (see Fig. S7 for more details). The averaged R for more than 100 events was used to create the heatmap in Fig. 4E.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-molecule analysis of MyD88 and MAL interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In Supplementary Fig. 2, mCherry-tagged “seeds” of MyD88FL and MALFL were purified using N-terminally tagged MyD88FL and C-terminally tagged MALFL. Proteins were expressed in LTE by addition of the respective template DNAs in 10 µL lysate at a final concentration of 40 nM. The expression was allowed to be carried out for 3.5 h at 27°C. To produce the “seeds”, the samples were then spun down at 13,000 x g for 5 min. 80% of the supernatant was discarded and the solution was sonicated for 1 min in a water bath. In the meantime, GFP-tagged MyD88FL or MALFL were expressed for 2.5 h, from 2 nM DNA template, and diluted 10 times before being placed under the microscope. Two lasers (488 nm and 561 nm) were focused in solution using a 40x/1.2 NA water immersion objective (Zeiss). Fluorescence was collected and separated using a 565 nm dichroic mirror; signal from GFP was passed through a 525/20 nm band-pass filter, while fluorescence from mCherry was filtered by a 580 nm long-pass filter. The fluorescence of the two channels was recorded simultaneously in 1 ms time bins. Fluorescence time traces were recorded for 75 s before 1 µL of “seeds” was introduced into the mixture and the measurements were carried out for an additional 300 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Protein Aggregation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For intensity measurements, C-terminal sGFP-labeled proteins were expressed in 10 μL of LTE using 20 nM of DNA template and incubated for 2 h at 27 °C. A 488 nm laser beam was focused in the sample volume using a 40x/1.2 NA water immersion objective (Zeiss). The fluorescence of GFP was measured through a 525/20 nm band pass filter, and the number of photons collected in 1 ms time bins (I(t)) was recorded. The proteins were diluted 10 times in buffer A to obtain the traces shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. S1.
The fluorescent time-trace I(t) obtained shows the presence of intense bursts of fluorescence for the mutants, with values well over the typical fluctuations of I(t). The presence of these bursts increases the standard deviation of the distribution. To compare the aggregation at different concentrations, we used the sigma parameter which is the standard deviation normalized by the square root of the mean signal.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying ASAP Membrane Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cortical neurons transduced with relevant Lentivirus as described above were imaged at DIV 15 (7 days after iCre transfection) in imaging solution (HBSS with 2 mM GlutaMAX, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4). As a membrane-localized reference channel, Crimson RFP26 (link) with a C-terminal farnesylation motif (CAAX) for membrane targeting was co-expressed with an ASAP variant via IRES. The epifluorescence from the cells were imaged on an Axiovert 200M inverted microscope with a 40x 1.2-NA water-immersion objective (Zeiss) and an X-Cite 120 metal-halide lamp (Exfo) as the excitation light source. For ASAP, excitation and emission filters were BP450-490 and BP515-565 (Zeiss). For Crimson, excitation and emission filters were HQ535/50m and HQ625/60m (Chroma). For each cell, 15 focal planes spaced 1 μm apart were captured by a Flash4.0LT+ camera using μManager. To quantify membrane localization, a custom-written MATLAB (MathWorks) code was used. Membrane masks of the neurons were generated by applying the graythresh function on Sobel-filtered red channel images. The soma masks were manually selected using the roipoly function on red channel images. Then the two masks were applied to background-subtracted green channel images to obtain the membrane fluorescence and the soma fluorescence of the ASAP reporter. The total fluorescence is the sum of the two.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Time-Resolved Fluorescence Imaging of CHH–Zn+EPI in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells seeded in
dishes were treated with CHH–Zn+EPI at a concentration of 4
μg mL–1 for 30, 76, 125, 194, 270, and 420
min, followed by washing with PBS. The time-resolved fluorescence
signal was acquired using an LSM 7 MP two-photon microscope (Carl
Zeiss, Weimar, Germany) coupled to the Becker and Hickl (BH) simple-Tau-152
system. Images were acquired through a Zeiss 20×/1 NA water-immersion
objective. A Zeiss dichroic mirror (T690) was used to separate the
excitation and the emission light. An additional barrier filter was
used to block emission light above 690 nm. Emission light was separated
by a dichroic mirror (555 nm) and the two fluorescent lights were
filtered by two band-pass filters (500–550 and 590–650
nm). Pseudocolored lifetime images were generated by assigning a color
to the value of average fluorescence lifetime τm at
each pixel. Emission light was collected via a hybrid GaAsP detector
(HPM-100-40, BH, Berlin, Germany) with a Cherry bandpass filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Two-Photon Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorescence lifetime images were acquired using LSM 7 MP 2-
photon microscope (Carl Zeiss, Weimar, Germany) coupled to the Becker
and Hickl (BH) simple-Tau-152 system. Chameleon Ti:sapphire laser
system with an 80 MHz repetition rate was used to excite the sample
at a wavelength of 800 nm. Images were acquired through a Zeiss 20
× 1 NA water-immersion objective. A Zeiss dichroic mirror (LP
760) was used to separate the excitation and the emission light. Emission
light was collected using a hybrid GaAsP detector (HPM-100-40, BH,
Berlin, Germany). The image acquisition time was set to 150 s to collect
a sufficient number of photons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging of Photostability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorescence lifetime images were acquired using a LSM 7 MP 2-photon microscope (Carl Zeiss, Weimar, Germany) coupled to the Becker and Hickl (BH) simple-Tau-152 system. Chameleon Ti:sapphire laser system with an 80 MHz repetition rate was used to excite the sample at a wavelength of 1000 nm. Images were acquired through a Zeiss 20 × 1 NA water-immersion objective. A Zeiss dichroic mirror (LP 760) was used to separate the excitation and the emission light. Emission light between 625 and 760 nm was collected via a hybrid GaAsP detector (HPM-100-40, BH, Berlin, Germany). The image acquisition time was 150−180 s to collect a sufficient number of photons.
For the photostability measurements, 50 images were collected for 23 min every 25 s. Images were analyzed using the SPCImage software (BH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!