The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Allegra mri

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Allegra MRI is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system developed by Siemens. It is designed to provide high-quality imaging for research and clinical applications. The Allegra MRI offers advanced imaging capabilities and is a compact, self-shielded system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using allegra mri

1

Neuroimaging of Children in South Africa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All children were scanned without sedation on a 3 Tesla Siemens Allegra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) at the Cape Universities Brain Imaging Centre (CUBIC) in South Africa with a single channel head coil according to protocols that had been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of the participating institutions. Parents/guardians provided written informed consent and children oral assent. Children were first familiarized with the scanning procedures on a mock scanner.
For each child we acquired a structural T1-weighted (T1w) volume using a volumetric navigated (Tisdall et al., 2012 (link)) multiecho magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MEMPRAGE) sequence (van der Kouwe et al., 2008 (link)) (voxel size = 1.3 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm3, FOV = 224 × 224 × 144 mm3, TR = 2,530 ms, TI = 1,160 ms, TEs = 1.53/3.19/4.86/6.53 ms, flip angle = 7°) and a pair of diffusion weighted data sets with opposite phase encodings (here, anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior, AP-PA) for EPI distortion correction during processing (Irfanoglu et al., 2012 (link)) using a volumetric navigated (Alhamud et al., 2012 (link)) twice-refocused spin echo sequence (voxel size = 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm3, matrix size = 112 × 112 × 72, FOV = 224 × 224 × 144 mm3, TR/TE = 10,000/86 ms, 30 non-collinear gradient directions with DW factor b = 1, 000 s mm−2, and four non-DW b = 0 s mm−2 (b0) acquisitions).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Newborn Brain Imaging using Multi-Echo FLASH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Newborns were scanned asleep without sedation (Laswad et al., 2009 (link)) between 1–7 weeks postpartum (median 2.8 weeks) at the Cape Universities Brain Imaging Centre (CUBIC; see Jacobson et al., 2017 (link); Warton et al., 2018 (link) for details). Scanning was performed on a 3T Allegra MRI (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a circularly-polarised birdcage coil designed for use in MR imaging of neonates, which was custom-built for the study at the HST/MGH Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (HST/MGH Martinos Center). A multi-echo FLASH (MEF) sequence (van der Kouwe et al., 2008 (link)) was acquired twice with protocol parameters: 144x144 matrix, 128 sagittal slices, TR 20 ms, TE’s 1.46/3.14/4.82/6.5/8.18/9.86/11.54/13.22 ms, 1x1x1 mm3 resolution, and flip angles 5° and 20°, respectively. Of the 52 infants scanned, 50 (27 choline, 23 placebo) provided usable data (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pediatric MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The children were imaged on a 3T Siemens Allegra MRI (Erlangen, Germany), without sedation while watching an age-appropriate feature film, using structural T1 imaging followed by 2 DTI acquisitions with opposite phase encoding directions using a twice-refocused spin echo sequence [26 (link)]. The 3D echo planar imaging (EPI) navigated [27 (link)] multiecho MPRAGE [28 (link)] (MEMPR) sequence was acquired in a sagittal orientation with the following parameters: FOV 224 × 224 mm, 144 slices, TR 2530 ms, TE 1.53/3.19/4.86/6.53 ms, TI 1160 ms, flip angle 7°, voxel size 1.3 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm3. DTI was performed in 30 directions with b-value 1000 s/mm2, voxel size 2 × 2×2 mm3, TR/TE 9500/86 ms, and 4 volumes with b = 0 s/mm2.
MRIs of children with motion corruption, showing incidental brain abnormalities, interslice instabilities or with an interval of over a year from the GMDS were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Longitudinal Validation of Tractography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-six participants were scanned at the MGH Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (Charlestown, MA, USA).64, 65, 68 Their self-identified ethnic makeup was: 3 African American; 5 Asian; 27 Caucasian; 1 multiracial. The mean age of this cohort was 40.5 years (range: 18–74). Thirty-three participants were right-handed, two were left-handed, and one was ambidextrous. Twenty participants were female; 16 were male. Thirty-one participants were scanned on a Siemens Tim Trio MRI; five participants were scanned on a Siemens Allegra MRI. This cohort was utilized to establish the tractographic method described below; this method was then tested using Cohorts B and C. Fourteen of these participants were scanned a second time, always utilizing the same MRI scanner for both acquisitions. We compared voxel location between the two scans to assess the longitudinal validity of the technique.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal Validation of Tractography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-six participants were scanned at the MGH Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (Charlestown, MA, USA).64, 65, 68 Their self-identified ethnic makeup was: 3 African American; 5 Asian; 27 Caucasian; 1 multiracial. The mean age of this cohort was 40.5 years (range: 18–74). Thirty-three participants were right-handed, two were left-handed, and one was ambidextrous. Twenty participants were female; 16 were male. Thirty-one participants were scanned on a Siemens Tim Trio MRI; five participants were scanned on a Siemens Allegra MRI. This cohort was utilized to establish the tractographic method described below; this method was then tested using Cohorts B and C. Fourteen of these participants were scanned a second time, always utilizing the same MRI scanner for both acquisitions. We compared voxel location between the two scans to assess the longitudinal validity of the technique.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pediatric Brain Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each child was transported to the Cape Universities Brain Imaging Centre (CUBIC) together with his/her mother at mean age 10.1 ±1.0 years. After familiarization with the scanning procedures on a mock scanner, data were acquired using two DTI acquisitions with alternating phase encoding directions (i.e., anterior–posterior and posterior–anterior (AP-PA)) on a 3 T Allegra MRI (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). For each acquisition, the following parameters were used: 4 reference images with b = 0 s/mm2 and 30 diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) with b = 1000 s/mm2; 72 slices; field of view (FOV) = 230 ×230 ×130 mm3; slice thickness 1.8 mm; 1.8 ×1.8 mm2 in-plane resolution; TR 10,000 ms; TE 88 ms. A 3D echo planar imaging (EPI) navigated [Tisdall et al., 2009 ] multi-echo magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MEM-PRAGE) [van der Kouwe et al., 2008 (link)] structural image (resolution 1.3 ×1.3 ×1.0 mm3, FOV = 256 ×256 × 167 mm3, 128 slices, TR 2530 ms, TI 1100ms, TEs 1.53/3.21/4.89/6.57 ms, flip angle 7°) was also acquired for each subject.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cerebellar Diffusion Imaging in FAS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The children and their mothers were transported to the Cape Universities Brain Imaging Center (CUBIC), a research-dedicated, child-friendly facility where they were familiarized with the scanning procedures by first practicing in a mock scanner. The children were imaged on a 3T Allegra MRI (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Diffusion weighting was performed in 30 directions; 36 slices were acquired in an oblique axial orientation that included primarily infra-tentorial structures to provide high-resolution cerebellar data. The first 18 children (3 FAS, 6 PFAS, 3 HE, 6 Controls) were imaged using five DTI acquisitions; the others, using six acquisitions with alternating phase encoding directions (i.e., anterior-posterior and posterior-anterior) to reduce echo planar imaging distortions. Voxelwise analyses repeated without the 18 children for whom the imaging protocol differed, yielded differences between the same groups in regions overlapping with those found for the whole sample. Further, analyses relating oz AA/day to the DTI measures in the regions where group differences were found were virtually unchanged with these 18 children included or excluded. Cerebellar T2-weighted structural images were acquired with a matched spatial resolution and slice position as the DTI in order to improve co-registration between the cerebellar DTI and whole-brain structural data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Functional MRI of Hippocampal Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning was done using a 3T Siemens Allegra MRI with a 16-channel whole-head coil. After a T2-weighted anatomical scan, functional images were acquired using a gradient-echo echo-planar pulse sequence (TR = 2.5 s, TE = 25 ms, 44 interleaved oblique-coronal slices, 3.4 × 3.4 × 3 mm voxels, no gap, flip angle = 90 degrees, FOV = 220 mm, 274 volumes per run for 6 runs, followed by 152 volumes for one run). Oblique-coronal slice acquisition perpendicular to the main axis of the hippocampus was used to minimize susceptibility artifacts in the MTL during fMRI data acquisition. Slices were positioned to ensure complete coverage of the occipital lobe, at the expense of excluding the frontal poles for participants for whom whole-brain coverage was not possible. High-resolution T1-weighted MPRAGE anatomical images (1 mm isotropic voxels) were collected after the 6 experimental runs and 1 localizer run. Head motion was restricted using foam inserts. Visual stimuli were projected onto a screen behind the subject and viewed through a mirror mounted on the head coil. Responses were made with handheld button boxes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!