The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using dnase treated

1

Transcript Quantification via qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and total RNA was extracted using TRI REAGENT (MRC), DNase treated (RQ1 Promega), and reverse transcription was achieved with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (RNase H minus, Point Mutant, Promega) using an anchored oligo(dT)20 primer. Accumulation of transcripts was measured by qRT-PCR (LightCycler 480, Roche Diagnostics) using the SYBRR Premix Ex TaqTM (TaKaRa). Gene expression was normalized using ACT2 as an internal standard. Sequences of primers used in qPCR for gene expression analysis are listed in Supplementary File 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Profiling Fungal Gene Expression in Host Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from the FRR2161 type strain (the wild-type strain) was isolated from vegetative hyphal cells grown at 25°C for 2 days in liquid medium, from asexually developing cultures grown on solid medium at 25°C for 7 days, and from yeast cells grown at 37°C for 6 days in liquid medium. RNA was isolated from yeast cells derived either from LPS-activated J774 murine macrophages infected with wild-type conidia at 24 h postinfection or from yeast cells incubated in macrophage growth media for 24 h. Macrophages were infected as described in the "In vivo macrophage assay" section below. RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and an MP FastPrep-24 bead beater according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was DNase treated (Promega) prior to RT-PCR analysis, and a synthesis control assay lacking cDNA was performed to ensure that no DNA contamination was present. Increasing numbers of cycles were used to ensure that the amplification was in the exponential phase, and the benA gene was used as a loading control. Expression of simA was determined by RT-PCR (Invitrogen Superscript III One-Step RT-PCR with platinum Taq) using primers simA-DD3 (5′-ATCCATCCCCCGTGAAGC-3′) and simA-DD4 (5′-GCCGACACGAAGTGATCC-3′). Band intensity was quantitated in Photoshop, and relative intensity values were calculated using the benA loading controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RT-qPCR Analysis of VEGF-C/D Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cultured BMDM using the RNAeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and 1-μg RNA was DNAse-treated (Promega, Madison, WI) and subsequently used for cDNA synthesis with an M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit (Promega), according to manufacture’s instructions. For reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the GoTag Green Master Mix (Promega) was used and PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed in a CFX96 Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with a Sybr Green Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific). Primers for mouse VEGF-C (forward 5′-AAGAAG-TATGCCGCT GTGTC-3′, reverse 5′-GGCAGAAAAC-CAGTCTTTGA-3′, product size: 250 base pairs), mouse VEGF-D (forward 5′-ACGAAGAGGGTGTGATGTGT-3′, reverse 5′-GGGGTCTGAATGGATCTTCT-3′, product size: 190 base pairs), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (forward 5′-CTGGAGAAACCTGCCAAGTA-3′, reverse 5′-TGTTGCTGTAGCCGTATTCA-3′, product size: 223 base pairs) were purchased from RealTimePrimers.com (Elkins Park, PA). Expression of VEGF-C/D was normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH and expressed as a fold change compared with the respective control treatment using the 2−ΔΔCT method.46 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Sm-LAMP and Sm-NPC2 Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relative abundance of the Sm-LAMP and Sm-NPC2 transcripts was determined for different S. mansoni life cycle stages (eggs, miracidia, cercariae, 5 day old schistosomula, adult males and adult females) and for microdissected digestive and reproductive tissues27 (link) using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), to confirm that the selected genes are enriched in the gastrodermis and in life cycle stages within the mammalian host27 (link). Forward and reverse primers (Sigma-Aldrich) were designed for Sm-LAMP and Sm-NPC2 using Primer3 (v.0.4.0) software (Supplementary Table 2). Total RNA samples were DNase treated (Promega) prior to synthesis of cDNA using a QuantiTect® Whole Transcriptome Kit (QIAGEN). All cDNA samples were diluted to 5 ng/μl. Real-time PCR was performed and analysed using previously described protocols61 (link) using DNA segregation ATPase62 (link) (Accession No. Smp176580) as the normalising housekeeping gene. Data were analysed using the Rotor Gene 6 software63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptomic Analysis of Blattella germanica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the GenElute mammalian total RNA kit (Sigma, Madrid, Spain). About 400 ng from each RNA extraction was DNAse treated (Promega, Madison, WI) and reverse transcribed with superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and random hexamers (Promega). RNA quantity and quality was estimated by spectrophotometric absorption at 260/280 nm in a NanoDrop ND-1000® spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).
Expression patterns for B. germanica BgN, BgDl and BgSer were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) in sixth-instar nymphs and adults in the first gonadotrophic cycle. Pools of two to six ovary pairs were used in each experiment. PCR primers for use in qRT-PCR expression studies were designed using Primer 3 v. 0.4.0 software [36 (link)]. The actin-5c gene of B. germanica was used as a reference for expression studies, and that of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (BgEIF4a) for functional studies. PCRs were performed as previously described [37 (link)]. Primer sequences and the accession numbers the sequences used are shown in the electronic supplementary material, table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Viral RNA Expression Using qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was harvested by Trizol purification, and following NanoDrop spectrophotometer analysis, 1 µg RNA was DNase treated (Promega) and reverse transcribed with a high-capacity cDNA RT kit (ABI). Gene-specific TaqMan primer-probe sets (ABI) were used to assess expression levels of COPA (Hs00189232_m1), COPB2 (Hs00178076_m1), ERC1 (Hs01553906_m1), and RAB4B (Hs01927479_s1). Custom primers were designed to assay samples for UL44, UL83, UL99, and UL94 RNA with the SensiFAST SYBR Hi-ROX kit from Bioline UK (BIO-92020), using the following primers: UL44 (pp52), 5′-CCGGGTCTGGATAACGATATTA and 5′-TTCTTGGTGTTAGGGACGAACT; UL83 (pp65), 5′-CAGGTACACCTTGACGTACTGG and 5′-AAAGAGCCCGACGTCTACTACA; UL94, 5′-AGACCGATTCCAGAACTTTGAA and 5′-AATACCATCGCACGTCATACTG; UL99 (pp28), 5′-TCTCTACGCTCCTACGACAACA and 5′-ATAATGGAGCTTTGCTGATGGT. qRT-PCR results were normalized to GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1) levels and then to siNeg levels at 7 dpi by the threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method. The assay was performed on two biological replicates, and error bars indicate the standard deviation between replicates. A two-tailed homoscedastic Student t test was applied to assess whether RNA levels after siCOPA treatment differed significantly from siNeg-treated cells (P > 0.05, not significant [NS]; P ≤ 0.05, *; P ≤ 0.01, **).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive RNA Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated as described (32 ). Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life technologies) and DNase treated according to manufacturer directions (Promega), primed with random nonamer (New England Biolabs), and reverse transcribed with M-MuLV (NEB). qPCR and qRT-PCR reactions were performed with SYBR green mastermix (Applied Biosystems) and run on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast machine. The primers for qPCR and qRT-PCR reactions are found in Supplemental table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Arabidopsis RNA Extraction and Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid N2 ground tissue was incubated with Trizol (1 mL per 100 mg of tissue; Invitrogen) at room temperature for 2 min. Chloroform (200 μL) was added, samples gently mixed and centrifuged (12,000 × g, 4°C, 15 min). The aqueous upper phase was retained, and combined with 250 μL high salt solution (0.8 M sodium citrate, 1.2 M sodium chloride) and 250 μL isopropanol. After mixing and centrifuging the samples, the pellet was isolated and washed with ethanol. Samples were then DNase treated (Promega), and a final clean up step was performed using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturers protocol. RNA concentration and quality was measured using a BioPhotometer plus (Eppendorf) as well as by agarose gel electrophoresis. Samples were then sent to the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC; http://affymetrix.arabidopsis.info/) for analysis. Quality control was first performed using an Agilent Bioanalyzer to check the integrity of the RNA. Following preparation of cDNA according to NASC standard protocols, the samples were hybridized to the Arabidopsis ATH1 Genome Array (Affymetrix). Raw data can be obtained from NASCarrays, experiment number 668.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive RNA Isolation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated with the GenElute Mammalian Total RNA kit (Sigma), DNAse treated (Promega) and reverse transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random hexamers (Promega). In the case of Drosophila, cDNA was obtained from whole larvae (CantonS) or L3 wandering salivary glands. B. germanica cDNAs were obtained from whole nymphs or wings and prothoracic gland (PG) of different juvenile instars. All the samples were collected from females except in the case of L1 and L2 tissues. Relative transcripts levels were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (quantitative PCR [qPCR]), using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). To standardise the qPCR inputs, a master mix that contained iTaq Universal SYBR Green PCR Supermix and forward and reverse primers was prepared (final concentration: 100 nM/qPCR). The qPCR experiments were conducted with the same quantity of tissue equivalent input for all treatments and each sample was run in duplicate using 2 μl of cDNA per reaction. All the samples were analyzed on the iCycler iQ Real Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). RNA expression was calculated in relation to the expression of DmRpl32 or BgActin5C. Primers sequences for qPCR analyses were (Duan et al., 2020 (link)):
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from brain using RNABee (AMSBio, Abingdon, UK) and RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA was Dnase treated (Promega) to remove genomic DNA. Reverse transcription of polyA mRNA from 5 μg total DNA‐free RNA was performed using Superscript First Strand Synthesis (Invitrogen) with Oligo‐dT primers. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) were performed using SYBR master mix (Rox) (Roche) on an MX3005pro (Stratagene) using the primer sequences detailed (Table 2). Gene expression relative to naïve Csf1rWT mice was calculated using the ΔΔCT method (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001 (link)) using Rpl19 as a reference gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!