The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsm 710 laser confocal microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany, Japan, United States

The LSM 710 is a laser confocal microscope manufactured by Zeiss. It is designed to capture high-resolution, three-dimensional images of samples. The microscope uses a laser as the illumination source and a confocal detection system to produce optical sections of the sample, allowing for detailed analysis of the specimen's structure and composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

80 protocols using lsm 710 laser confocal microscope

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Tissue and Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histological analysis, tissues were dissected and fixed in a mix of 2% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 20% sucrose solution overnight, followed by embedding and section. Then 6 μm O.C.T. tissue cryosections were stained with antibodies against F4/80 (1:100, eBioscience, Shanghai, China), αSMA (1:500, Abcam, Shanghai, China), CD31 (1:200, Abcam, Shanghai, China), MMP9 (1:200, Abcam, Shanghai, China). Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, 555, or 594 were used (1:500, Abcam, Shanghai, China). Fluorescent images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 710 laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed using Zen software (ZEN 3.0).
For ZO-1 detection in HUVECs, cell immunofluorescence was conducted as described previously [32 (link)]. Cells were incubated with primary antibody ZO-1 (1:400, Proteintech Group, Rosemont, USA) at 4 °C overnight. Nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min. Cells were viewed under the Zeiss LSM 710 laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed using Zen software (ZEN 3.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confocal imaging of live cells in modified Krebs-Ringer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 hr of transfection on glass-bottom dishes (In Vitro Scientific; cat no. D29-20-1-N), cells were washed and incubated in a modified Krebs-Ringer solution, containing 120 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.7 mM MgSO4, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM Na-HEPES (pH 7.4). Confocal images were taken with a Zeiss LSM 710 laser confocal microscope (Zeiss, Peabody, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging of Au Nanocrystals in COLO 829 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COLO 829 cells were seeded in 4-well Nunc Lab-Tek I chambers (100 000 cells per well in 500 μL of DMEMc) 1 day before the experiment. The medium was then changed, and cells were incubated with Hoechst 33342 (1 μM) to stain the nucleus for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were washed three times with PBS before a 30 min incubation at 37 °C with Au NCs at 25 or 100 μgAu mL−1 in DMEMc without phenol red. Cells were washed again three times before being imaged on a 37 °C pre-warmed chamber with CO2. Control samples without Au NCs were also imaged.
Fluorescence microscopy was performed on a Carl Zeiss LSM710 laser confocal microscope, using a plan-Apochromat 60x NA 1.4 oil-immersion objective and an APD detector (λexc. = 405 nm, λem. = 736 nm long pass filter, 380 nm resolution).
Analyses were performed with the ICY software (Institut Pasteur Bioimage Analysis).30 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Actin Filaments in Guard Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic plants expressing 35S:GFP‐fABD2 (Voigt et al., 2005) were crossed with the opal5 mutant, and the F3 plants homozygous at both loci were used to visualize actin filaments in guard cells of mature leaves from 3‐wk‐old seedlings. Detached leaves were incubated on 10 mM MES/KOH buffer (pH 6.2) for 0.5 h and then floated on the opening buffer (10 mM MES/KOH, pH 6.15, and 50 mM KCl) under white light (125 μmol m−2 s−1) for 3 h. Half of the light‐treated leaves were incubated under darkness for 30 min. The abaxial epidermis of the leaves was used to observe the guard cell actin cytoskeleton on an LSM 710 laser confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a ×63 oil‐immersion objective. Images of guard cells were acquired by serial optical sectioning (Z‐stack) at 1 μm intervals. The samples were excited at 488 nm and emission was detected using a 505 to 530 nm band pass filter. To observe leaf trichomes, the first pairs of true leaves of 10‐d‐old seedlings were fixed overnight at 4°C and dehydrated with ethanol. The specimen was then subjected to a critical point drying process, sputter‐coated and examined on an S‐3000N scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence microscopy, cells were cultured on coverslips, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min or with ice-cold methanol for 5 min, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X100 in PBS for 5 min. Coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies for 2 h, washed three times with PBS, and incubated with secondary antibodies for 30 min. Samples were mounted using ProLong Gold antifade reagent with or without DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Invitrogen) and observed using a Zeiss LSM710 laser confocal microscope. Samples were analysed by Structured Illumination Microscopy using an ELYRA Superresolution microscope from Zeiss. Automatic counting of LC3 vesicles from HeLa cells stably expressing GFP-LC3 was performed using the Cellomics ArrayScan VTI HCS Reader (20 × objective) and the Spot Detector V3 Cellomics BioApplication (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The numbers of vesicles per cell were counted for two thousand cells per coverslip and the mean number of vesicles per cell was calculated by the ArrayScan software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescent Staining Protocol for c-Fos and NPSR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
These sections were blocked with 10% bovine serum in PBS before they were incubated with a mixture of rabbit polyclonal antibody against c-Fos (1:1500) and goat anti-NPSR (1:500, sc-162893, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) in PBS containing 1% bovine serum for 72 h at 4°C on an agitator. After several rinses in PBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated affinipure donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:400, 711–545–152, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., PA, USA) and Cy™ 3-conjugated affinipure donkey anti-goat IgG (1:400, 705–165–147, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., PA, USA) for 24 h at 4°C. Primary antibody omission was used as a control. Finally, sections were mounted on slides, covered with a coverslip, using 50% glycerol in PBS, and observed under a fluorescence microscope and photographed under Zeiss LSM 710 laser confocal microscope. The specificity of the anti-NPSR antibody had been demonstrated in previous studies (Laitinen et al., 2004 (link); Shao et al., 2013 (link), 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of NLRC5 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well on glass-bottomed culture dishes and then fixed with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, followed by permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Human artery and mouse common carotid artery tissues were harvested and processed in optimal cutting temperature compound and sliced into 5 μm-thick sections. Paraformaldehyde-fixed sections, cryosections, and cells were incubated with anti-NLRC5 (ab105411, Abcam), anti-α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, ab7817, Abcam, 1:200), anti-PPARγ (sc-7196, Santa Cruz, 1:100), anti-CD31 (557355, BD Bioscience, USA, 1:100), anti-FLAG (ab49763, Santa Cruz, 1:100), and anti-myc (2276, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:100) overnight at 4 °C. Normal isotype IgG (sc2027, Santa Cruz) was used as negative control. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse; Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:200) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark. Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (Vector Laboratories), and cells were visualized using an LSM710 laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intracellular ROS Measurement in CRC Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HCT116 and HT29 was measured using the fluorescent probe dihydroethidium (DHE). For DHE staining, cells were seeded at a density of 50000 cells on coverslips in 24-well cell culture plates and allowed to become 40%-50% confluent. Following 48 h incubation with DIQ treatment at the IC50 dose, CRC cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 20 min. After fixation, CRC cells were washed twice with 1 × PBS, then incubated with 20 μmol/L DHE dye (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). After 45 min staining, the DHE stain was removed, and the cells were washed with 1 × PBS. Mounting media with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dye was added. Fluorescence images were taken immediately under a Zeiss LSM710 Laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with Zen software to process the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Anti-LacZ Immunostaining Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For anti-LacZ immunostaining, hindlimbs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight after removing the skin and muscle. The samples were washed and decalcified in 20% EDTA for 2 weeks with the solution changed every 4-5 days and then processed for paraffin sectioning at 6 μm thickness. Sections were baked at 60°C for 20 min, de-paraffinized and blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS + 0.1% Triton X100. The sections were further blocked by the streptavidin-biotin blocking kit (Vector Laboratories), reacted with rabbit anti-LacZ (MP Biosciences, #8559762, 1:2000), followed by biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (Vector laboratories, #BA-1000, 1:300) and HRP-streptavidin (Vector laboratories, SA-5004, 1:200). Signals were detected by using ImmPACT DAB substrate kit (Vector laboratories, #SK-4105). For detection of pSMAD1/5/8 (Millipore, AB3848-1 or 06-702, 1:50) or BMP2/4 (R&D, AF-355, 1:100) by immunohistochemistry, sections were treated similarly without baking, and signals were detected by using ImmPACT DAB substrate kit. For immunofluorescent detection, Alexa488-anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, A-11008, 1:1000) was used as the secondary antibody, and signals were detected by Zeiss LSM710 laser confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Immunoassay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total, cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were prepared using ReadyPrep Protein Extraction Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and aliquots of them were used for western blot analysis with antibodies to IκBβ, RELA, H3 and β-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). The immunoreactive bands were detected by ECL kit and visualized with ImageQuant LAS 4000. The collected culture medium was used for the assay of ICAM1, VCAM1, SELE, SELP and IL-6 by ELISA kits (Abcam, Inc.). HUVECs were cultured on slides in 6-wells plates and transfected with let-7e mimic and negative control as above mentioned. Then, cell immunofluorescence assay was performed using anti-NF-κB mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and Alexa Fluor 594-labelled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Jackson, US) as described previously50 . DAPI (6-diamidino-2- phenylindole, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used to stain the nuclear. The slides were observed under LSM 710 laser confocal microscope and analyzed using ZEN software (Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!