The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sequant zic hilic column

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United Kingdom, United States

The SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column is a liquid chromatography column designed for the separation of polar and hydrophilic compounds. It utilizes zwitterionic ion-exchange chromatography principles to achieve efficient separation of these types of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

41 protocols using sequant zic hilic column

1

Quantitative HILIC-MS Metabolite Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scan type: full MS in the positive-and-negative mode (alternating); scan range, 69–1000 m/z; resolution, 70,000; AGC-target, 3E6; maximum injection time, 200 ms; sheath gas, 30; auxiliary gas, 10; sweep gas, 3; spray voltage, 3.6 kV (positive mode) or 2.5 kV (negative mode); capillary temperature, 320 °C; S-lens RF level, 55.0; and auxiliary gas heater temperature, 120 °C. Annotation and data evaluation: Peaks corresponding to the calculated monoisotopic masses (MIM ± H+ ± 2 mMU) were integrated using TraceFinder software (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Materials: Ultrapure water was obtained from a Millipore water purification system (Milli-Q Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC–MS solvents, LC–MS NH4OAc and lamivudine were purchased from Merck. RP18-SPE Columns: 50 mg Strata C18-E (55 µm) in 1 mL tubes (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany). Sonifier: Branson Ultrasonics 250 equipped with a 13 mm-Disintegrator-Sonotrode (Thermo Scientific). LC/MS-system: Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC system hyphenated with a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (QE-MS) equipped with a HESI probe (Thermo Scientific). Particle Filter: Javelin Filter with an ID of 2.1 mm (Thermo Scientific). UPLC-precolumn: SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (5 μm particles, 20 × 2 mm) (Merck). UPLC column: SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (3.5 μm particles, 100 × 2.1 mm) (Merck).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Targeted LC-MS Analysis of PETobinostat in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse brain tissues were homogenized, and PETobinostat was extracted using 80% methanol. Targeted LC-MS detection was performed on a Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to a Vanquish UPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Q Exactive was operated in negative mode. A Sequant ZIC-HILIC column (2.1 mm inside diameter × 150 mm, Merck) was used for separation. Flow rate was set at 150 μl/min. Buffers consisted of 100% acetonitrile for mobile A, and 0.1% NH4OH/20 mM CH3COONH4 in water for mobile B. Gradient ran from 85 to 30% A in 20 min, followed by a wash with 30% A and re-equilibration at 85% A. PETobinostat was identified on the basis of exact mass within 5 parts per million (ppm) and standard compound retention time. Relative quantitation was performed on the basis of peak area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying TMAO and Related Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma levels of TMAO, TMA, and their metabolites dimethylamine (DMA) were determined using a previously described method [8 (link)]. For the liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis, an Agilent 6410 Series Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) with an electrospray ionization source was applied. We used diethylamine as an internal standard. Using an Agilent Technologies 1200 HPLC system, chromatographic separation was carried out on a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) protected by an Ascentis C18 column (2 cm × 4 mm, 5 μm; Merck KGaA). The eluate was monitored for DMA, TMAO, and TMA in multiple-reaction-monitoring mode using characteristic precursor-product ion transitions: m/z 46.1 → 30, m/z 76.1 → 58.1, and m/z 60.1 → 44.1, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative HILIC-LCMS Metabolomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prepared samples were analysed on a LCMS platform consisting of an Accela 600 LC system and an Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). A Sequant ZIC-HILIC column (4.6mm x 150mm, 3.5μm) (Merck) was used to separate the metabolites with the mobile phase mixed by A=0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and B=0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. A gradient program starting at 20% of A and linearly increasing to 80% at 30 min was used followed by washing (92% of A for 5 mins) and re-equilibration (20% of A for 10min) steps. The total run time of the method was 45 min. The LC stream was desolvated and ionised in the HESI probe. The Exactive mass spectrometer was operated in full scan mode over a mass range of 70–1,200 m/z at a resolution of 50,000 with polarity switching. The LCMS raw data was converted into mzML files by using ProteoWizard and imported to MZMine 2.10 for peak extraction and sample alignment. An in-house database including all possible 13C and 15N isotopic m/z values of the relevant metabolites was used for the assignment of LCMS signals. Finally the peak areas were used for comparative quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Analysis of Gut Microbiome-Derived Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMAO is formed from TMA, which is generated by the metabolism of gut microbiota from dietary precursors (e.g., choline and L-carnitine) [16 (link)]. TMAO and TMA can be metabolized to dimethylamine (DMA). Thus, simultaneous measuring of TMA, TMAO, and DMA and their combined ratios may understand the whole picture of TMA–TMAO metabolic pathway in the pathogenesis of hypertension. We analyzed plasma DMA, TMA, and TMAO levels by LC–MS/MS analysis using an Agilent 6410 Series Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source [27 (link)]. The multiple-reaction-monitoring mode was set up using characteristic precursor-product ion transitions to detect m/z 46.1→30, m/z 60.1→44.1, and m/z 76.1→58.1, for DMA, TMA, and TMAO, respectively. Separation was performed in the Agilent Technologies 1200 HPLC system consisting of autosampler and a binary pump. Chromatographic separation was performed on a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) protected by an Ascentis C18 column (2 cm × 4 mm, 5 µm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Diethyl amine was added to samples as an internal standard. The mobile phase containing methanol with 15mmol/L ammonium formate (phase A) and acetonitrile (phase B) was used at a ratio of 20:80 (phase A: phase B); with the flow rate set as 0.3–1 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Malonate and Succinate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis of malonate and succinate was performed using an LCMS-8060 mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, UK) with a Nexera UHPLC system (Shimadzu, UK). Samples were stored in a refrigerated autosampler (4 °C) upon injection of 5 μl into a 15 μl flowthrough needle. Separation was achieved using a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (3.5 μm, 100 Å, 150 × 2.1 mm, 30 °C column temperature; Merck Millipore, UK) with a ZIC-HILIC guard column (200 Å, 1 × 5 mm). A flow rate of 200 μl/min was used with mobile phases of: A) 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH unchanged); and B) 100% acetonitrile. A gradient of 00.1 min, 80% MS buffer B; 0.1–4 min, 80–20% B; 4–10 min, 20% B; 10–11 min, 20–80% B; and 11–15 min, 80% B was used. The mass spectrometer was operated in negative ion mode with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), and spectra were acquired using the LabSolutions software (Shimadzu, UK), with compound quantities calculated from relevant standard curves in MS extraction buffer (50% (v/v) methanol, 30% (v/v) acetonitrile, 20% (v/v) MS-grade water) compared with 1 nmol of relevant internal standard either [13C3]-malonate or [13C4]-succinate for malonate and succinate, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HILIC-LC-MS Metabolite Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation of water-soluble metabolites of UP was achieved by applying 3 μl of dissolved sample on a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC Column (3.5-μm particles, 100 × 2.1 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), combined with a Javelin particle filter (Thermo Scientific) and a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC Precolumn (5-μm particles, 20 × 2 mm; Merck) using a linear gradient of mobile phase A (5 mM NH4OAc in CH3CN/H2O (5/95, v/v)) and mobile phase B (5 mM NH4OAc in CH3CN/H2O (95/5, v/v)). The LC gradient program was 100% solvent B for 2 min, followed by a linear decrease to 40% solvent B within 16 min, then maintaining 40% B for 6 min, then returning to 100% B in 1 min and 5 min 100% solvent B for column equilibration before each injection. The column temperature was set to 30 °C; the flow rate was maintained at 200 μl/min. The eluent was directed to the HESI source of the QE-MS from 1.85 to 20.0 min after sample injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HILIC-MS Metabolite Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried metabolite extracts were resuspended in 50 μL of methanol–water (1:1, v/v) and analyzed using a method as described previously [51 (link)]. Metabolite separation was achieved by a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (100 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., 3.5 µm) (Merck, Germany) using a Waters I-Class Acquity UPLC system (Waters, UK). The UPLC system was coupled to a Vion IMS QToF system (Waters, UK) [51 (link)].
Significant differences were analyzed by a two-tailed Student’s t test with Microsoft Excel 2016. The principal component analysis plots were generated using SIMCA 14.1 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). PCA was applied to the data after mean centering and UV scaling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metabolite Profiling of Murine Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts of wet weight murine tissue were lysed in 250 ml extraction solution (30% acetonitrile, 50% methanol and 20% water) per 10 mg tissue in a Bullet Blender (Next Advance) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The suspension was immediately centrifuged (16,000g, 15 min at 4°C) and the supernatant analysed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Sample extracts were run twice on a liquid chromatography system fitted with a Sequant ZIC-HILIC column (5 μm, 4.6 x 150 mm) and afterwards with a Sequant ZIC-pHILIC column (5 μm, 2.1 x 150 mm), with the corresponding guard columns (both 2.1 x 20 mm, 5 μm) (all from Merck), and according to previously described gradient elution methods [1 (link)]. The mass spectrometer (Thermo Q Exactive) was operated in full scan mode with polarity switching. Samples were randomized to avoid bias due to machine drift and the operator was blinded to the sample key. Spectra were analysed using Xcalibur Quan Browser software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by referencing to an internal library of compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Methylamines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed plasma and urinary concentrations of DMA, TMA, and TMAO by LC–MS/MS analysis using an Agilent 6410 Series Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source [16 (link)]. The multiple-reaction-monitoring mode was set up using characteristic precursor-product ion transitions to detect m/z 46.1→30, m/z 60.1→44.1, and m/z 76.1→58.1, for DMA, TMA, and TMAO, respectively. Separation was performed in the Agilent Technologies 1200 HPLC system consisting of an autosampler and a binary pump. Chromatographic separation was performed on a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) protected by an Ascentis C18 column (2 cm × 4 mm, 5 µm; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Diethylamine was added to samples as an internal standard. The mobile phase containing methanol with 15mmol/L ammonium formate (phase A) and acetonitrile (phase B) was used at a ratio of 20:80 (phase A: phase B), with the flow rate set as 0.3–1 mL/min. The urinary concentration of each methylamine was corrected for urine Cr concentration, which was represented in ng/mg Cr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!