The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Peak scanner 2

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Peak Scanner 2 is a software tool designed for analyzing and visualizing chromatographic data. It provides users with the ability to view, annotate, and process peak data from various chromatographic techniques, such as liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using peak scanner 2

1

Determining X-Chromosome Inactivation Pattern

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X‐chromosome inactivation (XCI) pattern was studied using the human androgen receptor (HUMARA) assay (Allen, Zoghbi, Moseley, Rosenblatt, & Belmont, 1992). Family trio DNA samples were incubated overnight at 37°C with Hpa II and Hha I. The same samples were subjected to mock digestion without the restriction enzymes. The digested and mock‐digested samples were amplified by PCR using a fluorescently labeled primer set for targeting the short tandem repeat of the HUMARA locus (Table S3). The PCR products were analyzed on a 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Fragment analysis was performed by Peak Scanner 2 software (Applied Biosystems). The experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Analysis of Ancestry Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the quantitative analyses, we used 12 short tandem repeat markers (tetranucleotide repeat markers) on chromosomes 11, 14, 15, and 16 to investigate ABM as previously described [40 (link), 41 (link)]. These markers were amplified and separated via electrophoresis using an Applied Biosystems 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). We then quantitatively analyzed the data using the Peak Scanner 2 software (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identification and Analysis of MAML3 Microsatellites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the sequencing results of the promoter region and exon 1 of the MAML3 gene, two new microsatellites were identified. Both microsatellites were independently amplified using fluorescent primers [See Additional file 2: Table S2]. PCR were performed in a 25-μL reaction mix containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM of each PCR primer and 0.6 units of AmpliTaq Gold (Applied Biosystems). PCR were run as follows: 94°C for 10 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1.5 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The two amplicons were mixed at a ratio of 1:3 (HEX:FAM) and analyzed using capillary electrophoresis on an ABI Prism 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and the ROX-500 GeneScan Size Standard. The peak height of each product was determined using Peak Scanner 2 software (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microbial Profiling via Ribosomal Peaks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Files from the Genetic Analyzer were opened in Peak Scanner 2 software (
http://www.appliedbiosystems.com) using Analysis Method=Sizing Standard-PP, and Size standard=GS500. Only the green (hex-primer-labeled) peaks were used to determine level of bacterial abundance. The size and heights of the green peaks were calculated using the ROX GS500 standard. The individual output files were assembled into a single microbial profile file using the RiboSort package
34 (link) using the script, RiboSort(data,dataformat="standard",dye="G", output="proportions",zerorows=FALSE,repeats=1, mergerepeats="presentinall"). This program automatically bins the peaks to generate abundances; we used the default threshold of 50 fluorescence units as recommended by the program authors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

STR Marker Amplification and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic stability was confirmed by amplification of 6 different STR markers following standard protocols and analysis on a Sequence Analyser 3130XL (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Fragment sizes were analyzed with PeakScanner 2 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping of MHC Class I Microsatellites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from ear biopsies using a Qiagen DNeasy® extraction kit and subsequently genotyped at six MHC Class I linked microsatellite loci described by Cheng & Belov70 (link); Sh-MHCI101, Sh-MHCI102, Sh-MHCI105, Sh-MHCI106, Sh-MHCI107, and Sh-MHCI108. For further details on size range and primer sequences see Cheng & Belov70 (link). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out using the protocols of Cheng & Belov70 (link) and the PCR products were quality tested on a 2% agarose gel. The samples were analyzed at the Ramaciotti Centre (University of New South Wales, Australia) and microsatellite profiles of the individual devils were subsequently scored using Peak Scanner 2.0 (Applied Biosystems 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Extraction and Microsatellite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (gDNA) for both species was isolated using the HotShot protocol (Truett et al., 2000) specifically designed for small amount of tissues (method described in Appendix S1). Samples were screened at 10 microsatellite loci per species (Table S3). Details of PCR and profiling are provided in Appendix S1.
Fragment analysis was carried on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), and genotype peaks were scored using Peakscanner 2.0 (Applied Biosystems). Allele calling was performed with FlexiBin v2 (Amos et al., 2006). Each genotypic dataset was checked for quality in terms of (a) missing data, (b) repeatability, and (c) scoring errors (stuttering bands, allele dropouts, and null alleles). Repeatability was checked by re‐calling alleles for a subset of randomly chosen samples (~10% per dataset) and comparing them with previous scoring. The possibility for scoring errors was tested via Microchecker 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout, Hutchinson, Wills, & Shipley, 2004) and data corrected for null alleles using the Brookfield algorithm (Brookfield, 1996).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

X-Inactivation Analysis via HUMARA Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XCI patterns were examined using a methylation-sensitive PCR-based assay targeting the human X-linked androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) locus as described previously33 (link),34 (link). Genomic DNA digested with methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme HpaII (digested) and undigested DNA (undigested) were used as templates to amplify HpaII sites of the first exon of the HUMARA gene that contained the highly polymorphic repeat sequence by PCR using primers flanking the locus (Supplementary Table 1). The inactivation rate was calculated using PeakScanner2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Triplet-Primed PCR for CTG Repeat Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bidirectional triplet-primed PCR (TP-PCR) followed by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to assess patients for the presence of interruptions in the 3′ and 5′ ends of the CTG repeat. The results were visualized using Peak Scanner 2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Repeat interruptions are usually stretches of CCG or CGG repeats towards the 3′ end of the CTG repeat [24 (link),25 (link)], although other interruptions such as CTC [24 (link),26 (link)], CAG [27 (link)], and GCC [28 (link)] have also been reported, and interruptions have been observed at both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the repeat [27 (link)]. Repeat interruptions can be identified as gaps in the continuous and decreasing pattern of peaks seen when the output of TP-PCR is analyzed (Figure S1). The primer sequences, modifications to the manufacturer’s instructions, and PCR conditions can be found in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microsatellite Analysis of Genetic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples positive for two or more quality verification nuclear markers were used for microsatellite analysis. Twelve validated highly polymorphic microsatellite markers (MS1, MS2, MS5, MS6, MS7, MS8, MS9, MS10, MS12, MS15, MS20 and MS3.27) were amplified using hemi-nested PCR27 (link). Each 10-μL reaction consisted of 5 μL of the PrimeSTAR Max Premix (Takara-Bio, Kusatsu, Japan) and 1.25 μM of each primer (Supplementary Data 1). The primary PCR used 3 μL of DNA as a template, while the nested PCR used 1 μL of the primary PCR product. The cycling conditions for the primary PCR were as follows: 95 °C for 1 min; 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The cycling conditions for the nested PCR were as follows: 95 °C for 1 min, 35 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 61 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The nested PCR products were resolved on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer using the GeneScan 600 LIZ size standard (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Allele sizes were determined using Peak Scanner 2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Alleles with a minimum of one-third of the relative fluorescence units of the primary allele were recorded as secondary alleles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!