The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas software version 9

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Belgium, Brazil, United Kingdom, Cameroon

SAS software version 9.4 is a comprehensive data analysis and management solution. It provides advanced statistical and analytical capabilities for organizations to manage, analyze, and report on their data. The software includes a range of tools and features to support various data-driven tasks, such as data manipulation, statistical modeling, and predictive analytics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 458 protocols using sas software version 9

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed in at least triplicate. The results were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means were compared by carrying out the Tukey test (p < 0.05) using SAS software, version 9.4 (Statistical Analysis System, São Paulo, SP, Brazil).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Respiratory Outcomes in Pediatric PICU Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test and were reported as frequency (percentage). Continuous data were compared using independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test depending on if data was normally distributed or not and were reported as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range). Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to determine distributional assumptions. Propensity score matching was conducted using the Matchlt package version 4.3.2 in the R statistical program version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Logistic and linear regressions were employed to determine the associations for MV requirement and PICU LOS, respectively, while controlling for independent variables including continuous albuterol duration, cumulative prednisone equivalent dosing, ketamine exposure and magnesium infusion exposure. A generalized estimating equation was added to the regression models to account for matching via propensity scores. Model estimates and 95% confidence intervals are reported for models. Data management and analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (Statistical Analysis System, Cary, NC) with the alpha set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Sensory and Instrumental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of data from the acceptance test and instrumental texture was performed by ANOVA and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) Test of Means (p ≤ 0.05) using SAS software version 9.4 (Statistical Analysis System, Raleigh, NC, USA). Data from purchase intention were plotted in frequency histograms for each sample [29 (link)]. Data from CATA and Projective Mapping were analyzed using XLSTAT software version 2023 (Addinsoft, Paris, IF, France). Cochran’s Q test (p ≤ 0.05) and correspondence analysis (CA) were also performed for data from CATA and correlated to acceptance test data.
Furthermore, data from CATA and acceptance tests were correlated by employing Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression analysis [24 (link)]. The overall impression was considered the dependent variable (Y-matrix), while CATA parameters were the independent variables (X-matrix) [40 (link)]. Data from Napping were analyzed using Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) [38 (link),41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bioactivity Evaluation of Chromatographic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-vitro bioactivity assays (Glucose uptake, hepatic glucose production and anti-inflammatory experiments) were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software version 9.1 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with Dunnett’s post hoc test at a significant p value of 0.05 for acceptance. Peak areas of the chromatograms have been compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software version 9.1 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with Tukey’s post hoc tests at a significant p value of 0.05 for acceptance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dental Adhesive Resin Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values of degree of conversion were statistically analyzed using t-Tests and post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls tests (SAS software, version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Values of biaxial flexure strength were statistically analyzed using general linear models and Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc tests (SAS software, version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Values of elastic modulus and roughness were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (JASP, v. 0.15, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands). RLU values indicating the viability of non-disrupted biofilms of S. mutans grown against the surfaces of both unaltered and experimental dental adhesive resins were statistically analyzed using two-factor general linear models (GLM) and post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls tests (SAS software, version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All tests were conducted with a level of significance of 95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fungal Treatment Optimization for Substrate Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of amount of inoculum, particle size and incubation on ergosterol content, detergent fiber composition and IVGP was tested using the generalized linear model (GLM) analysis in SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). The following model was used: Yijk=µ+αi+βj+γk+ωijk in which Yijk is the observation at incubation time i; μ is the overall mean; αi is the fixed effect of amount of inoculum i; βj is the fixed effect of particle size j; γk is the fixed effect of incubation time k; ωijk is the random error.
The results of ergosterol measurements, chemical analysis and IVGP at different incubation times of the fungal treatment of each substrate, for each amount of inoculum and particle size combination, were compared using the generalized linear model (GLM) analysis in SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Post-hoc multiple comparison with Tukey’s significant test at a level of α = 0.05 was performed to determine the significance of differences between the treatments. The following model was used: Yij=µ+αi+ωij in which Yij is the observation j at incubation time i; μ is the overall mean; αi is the fixed effect of incubation time i; ωij is the random error.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparing Exserohilum and Bipolaris Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Counts of pots with symptoms after inoculation with the different Exserohilum and Bipolaris isolates were compared using a Chi2 test in Microsoft Excel. Average disease intensity per plant (%) was calculated per block for the second trial. Analysis of variance (PROC GLM, SAS software version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used to determine significant differences in disease intensity (%) values among the Exserohilum and Bipolaris isolates, plant species and their interaction. Means for isolates and plant species were separated using Tukey's test. In the second experiment, areas under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values were calculated and compared with a generalized model analysis of variance using SAS statistical software (PROC GLM, SAS software version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc.). There were no effects of repetition or repetition–treatment interactions; therefore, the data of the repeated experiments were analyzed together. Furthermore, these data were log-transformed and regressed on time without intercept to quantify the relationship between log (% infection) and days after inoculation for individual combinations of C and P isolates of E. rostratum, rye grass, stilt grass, and blocks. Estimates for the slope were compared with a generalized model analysis of variance. Means were separated using Tukey's test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analyzing Campylobacter coli Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the proportions of HAT C. coli between C. coli sharing MLST STs with isolates from a human source and C. coli belonging to other MLST STs. OR and CI calculations were performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Mid-P exact tests were performed to assess differences in the levels of resistance to CIP according to aerotolerance levels of C. coli using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Memory B-cell Longitudinal Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assuming the log 10 transformation of the GMTR followed a normal distribution, the mean and 95% CIs were calculated on a log 10 scale; antilog transformations were applied to the results of calculations to compute GMTs, GMTRs and 95% CIs on their original scale. Analyses were performed with SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
For the memory B-cell analysis, a 3-way analysis of variance model was used with group, serostatus and time points and their interaction (triple interaction term) as fixed effects, computed in a mixed model with repeated statement to account for the longitudinal aspect of the study (participant repetition). All data were log 10transformed before statistical analysis. Analyses were performed with SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute). P values were corrected for multiple testing using the False Discovery Rate procedure (q-values reported).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ectoparasite Counts and Larval Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using general linear models with SAS software version 9.4 [38 ]. Rhipicephalus microplus, D. hominis larvae and H. irritans counts were not normally distributed and were log transformed (count + 1) to ensure normality, homogeneity of variances, residual analysis and randomness of the observations with back-transformed least squares means. The effects included in the model were ectoparasite counts, treatment and time point. A protected Student t-test was used for mean separation and the significance level set to 5% (P < 0.05).
Analysis of data for viable C. hominivorax larvae and egg mass (independent of the viability) in wounds was conducted using SAS software version 9.4 [38 ], and Fisher's non-parametric test was used for mean separation, with the significance level set to 5% (P < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!