The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

64 protocols using dnaeasy plant mini kit

1

Genome Skimming of Melastomataceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genome skimming was performed for 16 species of Melastomataceae. Sampling was based on previous family wide phylogenetic studies (Michelangeli, Ulloa & Sosa, 2014 (link); Goldenberg et al., 2015 (link)), where each sample belongs to a different major lineage of the family, either with a formal tribe status or not. Voucher information along with GenBank accession codes are presented in Table 1. Total genomic DNA was isolated from silica-dried tissue using the Qiagen DNAeasy plant mini-kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the protocol suggested by Alexander et al. (2007) (link) or used a modified CTAB extraction where the aqueous supernatant was silica-column purified (Neubig et al., 2014 ). Total DNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or Qubit 2.0 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Total genomic libraries and barcoding was performed at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories or at Rapid Genomics (Gainesville, FL, USA) for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Grapevine Crown Gall Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crown gall tumor samples (1 tumor per grapevine) were collected from 73 grapevines in six vineyards from Hungary (two vineyards, n = 37), United States (two vineyards, n = 13), Tunisia (one vineyard, n = 21), Japan (one vineyard, n = 2) mostly in the summer or autumn (June–September) of 2013 and/or 2014 (see Supplementary Table S1 for sample-specific detail). In the northern hemisphere, CG tumors start to develop in late May (Jackson, 2014 (link)), therefore the age of the tumor tissue collected in this study ranges from approximately 1-month to 3-month-old. Each sample was collected by using separate sterile or flamed surgical blades and stored on ice during transportation to the lab. The DNA extraction was performed from approximately 200 mg of homogenized CG tissue within a day of sample collection using a modified CTAB method (Xu et al., 2005 (link)) or the Qiagen DNAeasy Plant Minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Supplementary Table S1). The extracted gDNA was sent to Monash University Malaysia for 16S amplicon library construction and Illumina sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Developing Near-Isogenic Lines for Wheat Flowering Time

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, 175 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from a cross between soft winter wheat cultivars AGS 2000 (PI612956) and 26R61 (PI612153) described by Hao et al. [12 (link)] were evaluated for heading date in both the field and greenhouse. Near isogenic line (NIL) from two F7 RILs, AP37 and AP129, for which flowering time variation was observed after partial vernalization treatment were derived as follows. Seeds from each greenhouse plant were harvested separately then sown in single one-meter long rows in the field at Raleigh, NC during fall 2013. At the booting stage, tissue was collected from ten individually tagged plants in each row and DNA was isolated using the QIAGEN DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). Samples were evaluated with markers for the PPD-A1, PPD-B1, PPD-D1, VRN-A1 and VRN-B1 loci (Table 1) and heads from the tagged plants were harvested. Seeds from a single head of plants derived from the same RIL having identical homozygous genotypes at all PPD1 loci and contrasting genotypes for either the VRN-A1 or VRN-B1 locus were selected and seed of NIL pairs increased in the greenhouse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Cultivation of R. solani

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The R. solani AG2-2IIIB isolate BBA 69670 (DSM 101808) deriving from sugar beet grown in Bavaria, Germany, was used in the study. Fungal mycelia were grown in liquid potato dextrose broth (PDB) in darkness at 23–24 °C for 48 h, under shaking conditions (150 rpm). DNA was extracted using the QIAgen DNAeasy Plant Minikit (Qiagen). For RNA the fungus was grown in PDB or sugar beet media containing 4 g surface-sterilized sugar beet pieces in 100 ml sterile H20 and cultured as above. RNA was isolated by RNeasy kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was prepared at Vertis Biotech, Freising, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Cotton Leaf Curl Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum) showing typical leaf curling, vein thickening and enation on the abaxial side of leaf were collected from a field in Lucknow, U. P., India (26° 50′ 49.2″ N, 80° 56′ 49.2″ E). The leaf sample of the diseased cotton plant was collected from a private land with the verbal consent of the owner to pick the leaf sample for academic purpose (Gossypium hirsutum is not an endangered or protected species), in September of 2010. Total genomic DNA from diseased cotton leaf was isolated using DNAeasy plant mini kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Begomoviral complex was confirmed as described by Kumar et al. [30 (link)]. Full-length genome of CLCuBuV was amplified using templiPhi DNA amplification kit (GE healthcare, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The RCA (rolling circle amplification) product was partially digested with 1 U of HindIII restriction enzyme (Fermentas, USA) and incubated at 37°C for 25 min. The purified DNA fragment was ligated into pBluscriptSK+ vector and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells. The clone was sequenced by automated sequencer (Ocimum Biosolutions Ltd., India) and the nucleotide sequence was submitted in GenBank under the accession number KF767352. Genome organization of DNA-A component of CLCuBuV is represented in Fig. 1A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Extraction from Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from young unfolding leaf tissues. About 1 g of fresh leaf tissue was grounded into a fine powder in prechilled mortar and genomic DNA from individual accession was extracted using, DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, USA). The DNA extraction was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. DNA concentration were determined comparatively by electrophoresis at current of 100 amps, 80 volts, for 40 minutes using agarose gel (0.8 %) electrophoresis, by applying 5 μl gDNA loaded after mixing with 3 μl 6X loading dye (Promega, USA) to check the quality of the DNA by comparing the intensity of the bands with a 1kb standard (Thermo Scientific, USA). The gel was visualized under a UV transilluminator and the gel was imaged with a gel documentation system (Ingenius-3, Syngene, USA) to confirm the quality of the genomic DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing of Arabidopsis rdm1 Mutant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from Wassilewskija (WS), rdm1-3 and two independent lines expressing RDM1-3xFLAG was extracted using the DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). DNA were sheared to 300 bp with a Covaris S2 (Covaris). Libraries, including bisulfite conversion, were made with the NuGEN Ultralow Methyl-seq kit (NuGEN) and EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer’s instructions. WGBS analysis was performed similar as before13 (link). In general, raw reads were aligned to TAIR10 genome using BSMAP28 (link) with –v 2 (allowing maximal two mismatches) and –n 1 (aligning to both strands). Reads were discarded if there were more than three consecutive methylated CHH sites within the reads (for 50 bp long read)29 (link). Methylation levels at each cytosine were calculated as #C/(#C+#T). DMRs between WS and rdm1 were defined using R package DMRcaller30 (link). To define CHH DMRs, parameters were applied as before31 (link). Basically, 100 bp bins with more than four cytosines and each cytosines with more than 4 read coverage as well as more than 0.1 difference between rdm1 and WS were used as cutoff. DMRs within 200 bp of each other were merged for further analysis. Cytosine methylation over rdm1 hypo CHH DMR were extracted and plotted in R. WGBS tracks displayed in Fig. 1c correspond to wild-type Col-0 samples as described in Stroud et al.31 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Characterization of Elite Oil Palm Germplasm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 1,218 tenera palms derived from multiple UR x AVROS crosses13 was selected as the study population. The population is maintained at Sime Darby R&D Centre, Malaysia and was phenotyped for the traits of M/F, S/F, K/F, F/B, O/M, O/B and O/P according to the industry standard29 , 30 . The phenotying of these traits, except O/P were conducted under bunch analysis to generate reliable mean values with at least 3 bunches per palm. The O/P trait was then calculated based on the multiplication between 4-year average fresh fruit bunch (FFB) and O/B.
The genomic DNA of each palm was extracted from 100 mg of dried leaf tissue and purified using the DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Genotyping of this population was done using the OP200K SNP array31 and 92,057 SNPs were found to be polymorphic and were used for GS purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Horsegram Genomic DNA Isolation and ddRAD Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaves of 40 horsegram germplasm accessions using the DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit (catalog # 69104, Qiagen). The quality and quantity were checked using a NanoDrop device, a Qubit assay, and agarose gel electrophoresis. Double-digested restriction associated DNA (ddRAD) libraries were prepared. In brief, 250–1,000ng DNA was digested with two units MlucI and four units SphI restriction enzymes at 37°C overnight followed by AMPure purification. Adapters specific to MlucI and SphI were ligated to the double-digested DNA using T4 DNA ligase at room temperature for 30min and then heat killed at 65°C for 15min. Equal volumes of five samples of ligated DNA were combined to prepare one Illumina library. (In total, eight libraries were prepared for 40 samples.) The samples were size selected (370–470bp) on a 2% SYBR safe gel and purified. The samples were enriched in nine cycles of PCR amplification, and the PCR products were purified using AMPure beads. The concentration of the ddRAD libraries was checked using Qubit, and the quality was assessed using Agilent 2200 TapeStation on a D1000 ScreenTape system. The ddRAD libraries were paired-end (2×100 ntds) sequenced using Illumina HiSeq2500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA and RNA Extraction from Horsegram

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from horsegram variety PHG-9 (Supplementary Figure S1) using the DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Catalog # 69104, Qiagen), and the DNA quality was checked using a NanoDrop device. The RNA from root and leaf tissues was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Catalog # 15596026, Invitrogen), followed by the procedure of the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep kit (Catalog # R2050, Zymo Research). The integrity and quantity of the RNA were checked using the Agilent 4200 TapeStation system. Then, the RNA from root and leaf tissues was mixed in equimolar proportions and processed as a single sample for RNA-seq library preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!