The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using glass bottom

1

Murine Hematopoietic Cell Isolation and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary murine hematopoietic cells were isolated from GFP-p65/H2B-mCHERRY transgenic mice described above43 (link),44 (link). Cells were cultured before and during time-lapse movies in 4-well micro-inserts (Ibidi) within a 24 well plate with glass bottom (Greiner) for 12 h. Before the start of cultures, the plate was coated with 10 µg/mL anti-CD43-biotin antibody for 2 h at room temperature in order to reduce cell movement32 (link),40 (link). After washing with PBS, 1 mL of IB20/SI media (IB20 = custom IMDM without riboflavin (Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 20% BIT (Stem Cell Technologies), 50 U/mL Penicillin, 50 µg/mL Streptomycin (Gibco), GlutaMAX (Gibco), 2-Mercaptoethanol (50uM, Gibco); SI = 100 ng/mL murine SCF + 10 ng/mL murine IL-3 (both Peprotech)) was added per well and cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. For GMP displacement experiments all GMPs were imaged for 1 h before half the wells were washed with 1 mL base media at 50 µL/s. Cells were manually tracked and changes in motility in washed and unwashed wells determined using R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence experiments, 2 × 103 cells were seeded in 96‐well plates with glass bottom (Greiner) and treated as indicated in each experiment. After treatments, cells were fixed for 15 min at 37°C with 3.7% v/v formaldehyde in CCM. Samples were washed with PBS twice, permeabilized with 0.1% TritonX‐100 (Roth) in PBS for 10–15 min and blocked with 5% BSA (Roth) in PBS for 10 min. Samples were then incubated with the indicated primary antibodies diluted in 3% BSA‐PBS, overnight at 4°C (for details, please be referred to Reagents and Tools table). Following this, samples were washed three times with PBS, with each washing step lasting 10 min. Samples were then incubated with the appropriate secondary fluorescent antibodies diluted 1:500 in 5% BSA‐PBS for 45 min, protected from light. After three 10‐min washing steps with PBSEN, cells were mounted using the Roti‐Mount FluorCare mounting medium (HP20.1, ROTH), containing DAPI. Images were acquired using 40× and 63× objective lenses on SP8‐X and SP8‐DLS Leica confocal microscopes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Supported Lipid Bilayer Formation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Supported lipid
bilayers (SLBs) were formed by fusion of SUVs in a 96-well plate with
a glass bottom (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). Plates
were cleaned for 30 s (30% power, 0.3 mbar) in a Zepto plasma cleaner
(Diener electronic GmbH, Ebhausen, Germany) using oxygen as the process
gas. Lipids were prepared as described above, except that sonication
was used instead of freeze–thaw cycles to form SUVs. SUVs were
added to each reaction chamber at a final concentration of 0.6 mg/mL
and incubated for 2 min on a 37 °C warm heating block. Unfused
SUVs were then removed through subsequent washing with SLB buffer
(25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl), and after cooling to room temperature,
SLB buffer was exchanged to Min buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150
mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Profiling Extracellular Vesicle-Associated FHR-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vesicles isolated by precipitation from human serum were incubated with monoclonal anti-human FHR-110 (link) antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 647 (1:200) to detect FHR-1. FHR-1-transporting EVs were captured using beads coated with monoclonal FHR-1 antibody and were stained with Alexa Fluor 647-labeled anti-human CD9 antibody (1:100; Novus Biological, cat no. NB500-327). Samples were transferred into 35 mm culture dishes with a glass-bottom (Greiner). To detect nucleic acids in vesicles, the vesicles were incubated with 5 µM SYTOX orange (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Pictures were taken with LSM and analyzed using ZEN 2011 software.
PLA assays were performed to evaluate the co-localization of the vesicle markers CD9 and FHR-1. Vesicles isolated by precipitation from human serum were seeded onto 6.7 mm diagnostic slides coated with poly-l-lysine. The vesicles were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, blocked with Duolink blocking solution (Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated with mouse antibody to human FHR-113 (link) (1:200) and rabbit antibody to human CD9 (1:200; Abcam, cat no. ab92726). PLA assays were performed using the Duolink In Situ Red Starter Kit Mouse/Rabbit (Sigma-Aldrich, cat no. DUO92101) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were captured with LSM 710 fitted with ZEN 2011 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Colocalization Analysis of mTOR and LAMP1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After amino acid starvation and re-stimulation, cells were rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS and mounted on dishes with glass bottom (Greiner Bio-One, Stuttgat, Germany) using SmearGell (GenoStaff, Tokyo, Japan). The embedded samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 15 min at room temperature. They were then rinsed twice with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 6 min. After rinsing twice with PBS, the samples were blocked for 40 min with Blocking-One (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), and then incubated with primary antibodies in Blocking-One overnight at 4°C, rinsed twice with PBS, and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 and 594-conjugated secondary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were washed with PBS and DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) for nuclear staining, and then rinsed with 0.1% Triton X-100. Images were acquired on a spinning disk confocal super-resolution microscope (SpinSR10, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a 100 X oil immersion objective lens (Olympus). To quantify co-localization, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated from approximately 50–100 cells per sample using Cellsens imaging software (Olympus) with manually set thresholds. All the images were obtained and analyzed in a single setting. The primary antibodies used were mTOR (CST #2983; 1:400) and LAMP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology #SC-20011; 1:400).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Biofilm Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biomass was quantified by using a crystal violet assay, CFU counts were determined by plating, and cell viability was determined by a resazurin-based assay as described by Peeters et al. (33 (link)). For confocal laser scanning microscopy, biofilms were grown in a 96-well plate with a glass bottom (Greiner Bio-One), stained with a LIVE/DEAD solution (0.3% SYTO 9 and propidium iodide in PS; Life Technologies) for 15 min, and visualized with a motorized Nikon TE2000-E inverted microscope (Nikon Benelux) (36 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescence Microscopy Visualization of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescence microscopy, proteins were visualized by fusion to GFP, 3 X mRFP or mCherry. The nuclear chromatin region was stained with bisbenzimide H33342 fluorochrome trihydrochroride (Hoechst 33342). Living cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (model BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and images were obtained by a BX51 fluorescence microscope (Olympus) equipped with an ORCA-R2 camera (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). Filter sets U-MWU (Olympus), U-MWIB (Olympus), and U-MWIG2 (Olympus) were used for Hoechst 33342, GFP and mCherry/3 X mRFP, respectively. Image acquisition and processing were carried out by using Aquacosmos (Hamamatsu Photonics) and Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA) software. Time-lapse observation was performed as follows. Cells were incubated on SSA at 28°C for 16 hours. After conjugation, cells were inoculated to SSA medium on a cell-culture dish with a glass bottom (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) and observed under a fluorescence microscope (model IX71; Olympus) as described in Nakamura et al. (2008) [31 (link)]. Images were processed with Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Live-cell imaging of AuNP cellular uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates with glass bottom (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) at a density of 10,000 cells per well and were allowed to attach overnight. The next day, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 staining (1 mg/mL in H2O; 1000× diluted). JetPEI/pDNA/AuNP 5 pt complexes were prepared as described above. Cells were incubated with JetPEI/pDNA/AuNP 5 pt complexes in Opti-MEM for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing the particles off, the cells were provided with full cell culture medium and live-cell imaging was performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (C1si, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). A Plan Apo VS 60× 1.4 NA oil immersion objective lens (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to obtain a pixel size of 70 nm and AuNP were detected by the reflected laser light of the 561 nm laser. Image processing was performed using ImageJ (FIJI) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Calcium Imaging of Astrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Astrocytes were grown on cell culture dishes with a glass bottom (Greiner; 65,000 cells/cm2). The cells were loaded with Fluo-4 A.M. (4 μm, Invitrogen) for 20 min and then incubated for a further 30 min in 37°C before measurement. Imaging was performed in normal extracellular solution (NES) containing 136 mm NaCl, 2.5 mm KCl, 10 mm HEPES, 1.3 mm MgCl2, 10 mm glucose, and 2 mm CaCl2, pH 7.3 (Royle et al., 2008 (link)) as described previously (Terunuma et al., 2015 (link)). In some experiments, extracellular calcium was chelated with 2 mm EGTA added into the buffer. Fluorescence images were acquired with a Zeiss Cell Observer Spinning Disk Confocal microscope using epifluorescence illumination (excitation filter bandpass 470/20 nm, emission 525/50 nm), LD LCI Plan-Apochromat 25×/0.8W objective, Zen 2012 Blue software (Carl Zeiss) and Hamamatsu ORCA-R2 camera (Hamamatsu). Images were captured at 1-s intervals for up to 2 min (in some experiments up to 4 min) in 37°C and 5% CO2. Image data were analyzed by Zen 2012 Blue software and subsequently by OriginPro 2016 software (OriginLab). The change in intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) is represented by relative fluorescence intensity [(F1 – F0)/F0, relative unit (r.u.)] (F0, at rest; F1, after administration of drugs, background subtracted) in the selected cytoplasmic or nuclear parts of the cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

NanoLuc Luciferase Assay for CST Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type HEK293T cells (2 × 105) were seeded in a complete growth medium onto a 35 mm cell culture dish with a glass bottom (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). 20–24 h after plating the cells were transfected with a combination of plasmids bearing genes encoding the wild-type CST fused with either large (LgBiT) or small (SmBiT) subunit of NanoLuc luciferase (Table S5, 250 ng of each plasmid, 500 ng in total) using the FuGENE® HD transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA); 2–3 h before the measurement the conditioned medium was replaced with the serum-free OPTI-MEM medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Immediately before the measurement, the Live Cell Reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added to the cells according to a scaled-up protocol and the cells were immediately examined with an LV200 bioluminescence imaging system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!