The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

153 protocols using nanog

1

Characterizing hiPSCs by Stemness Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hiPSCs were continuously subcultured for more than 30 passages on hUC-MSCs feeder and characterized by immunocytochemistry with stemness-related fluorescence-labeled antibodies, which were OCT4 (octamer-binding transcription factor 4), SOX2 (SRY related HMG box-2), NANOG, SSEA4 (stage-specific embry-onic antigen-4) and TRA-1-60 (Abcam, UK). The nuclei were visualized by staining with DAPI (4’,6-Diamidine-2’-phenylindole dihydrochloride) (Roche, USA).
The hiPSCs were cultured on sterile cover glass in 24-well plates (Nunc, Denmark) with the hUC-MSCs feeder. After 2–3 days of following passage, growing hiPSCs on the feeder were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Boster, China), then the cells were incubated with the following antibodies: OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, SSEA4 and TRA-1-60 (Abcam, UK), and stained according to manufacturer’s protocol. The stained cells were imaged with an inverted fluorescence microscope (ix71; Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human lung cancer (LUC1501) tissue microarray used in this study was purchased from US Biomax Inc. (Rockville, MD, USA). The slides were stained for Snail (Abcam; 1:250 dilution) and Nanog (Epitomics; 1:200 dilution) at the Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital. The tissue specimen grades were confirmed by a pathologist and included 3 normal lung tissues, 14 adenocarcinomas, 31 squamous cell carcinomas, 7 adenosquamous carcinomas, and 3 metastatic adenocarcinomas. The immunoreactive score was calculated by multiplying the staining intensity score by the percent positivity [52 (link)], which were determined by an experienced pathologist (Dr. Yi-Jen Peng, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pluripotency Marker Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed by RIPA buffer and the Bradford dye method was used to determine the protein concentration. Equal amounts of cell protein were subjected to electrophoresis in SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore) for antibody blotting. The following antibodies were used: UHRF1 (Abcam), Sox2 (epitomics), Oct4 (epitomics), Nanog (epitomics), β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (Pierce) was used as the secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA (radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer and the protein concentrations determined by the Bradford assay. Equal amounts of cell extracts were subjects to electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Merck, Shanghai, China). After protein transfer, the membranes were blocked and then incubated with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Ambion, ThermoFisher Scientific), β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Gene Company Ltd), p-AURKA (Thr288; Cell Signaling Technology, Gene Company Ltd), AURKA (Upstate, Gene Company Ltd), HA-tag (Sigma), c-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), SOX2 (Epitomics, Abcam, Hang Zhou, China) and Nanog (Epitomics, Abcam) primary antibodies at 4 ° overnight. The membranes were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the appropriate secondary antibodies. Proteins were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CSC and EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to assess the protein expression of six CSC markers (CD133, CD44, ALDH1, SOX2, OCT4, and Nanog) and two EMT markers (E-cadherin and Snail-1). An automated immunostainer (Benchmark Ventana, Tucson, AZ) was used to stain tissue sections following the manufacturer's recommended procedure. The primary antibodies used against the follows: CD133 (1:200; Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA), CD44 (1:200; Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA), ALDH1 (1:100; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), SOX2 (1:100; Cell Signalling, Beverly, MA), OCT4 (1:100; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA), Nanog (1:100; Epitomics, CA), E-cadherin (1:100; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and Snail-1 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). IHC results were graded semiquantitatively based on the percentage of cells stained and the intensity of staining [34 (link)]. Briefly, the staining intensity was graded as weak (1+), moderate (2+), or strong (3+) and was multiplied by the percentage of positive cells. The total score was then classified as follows: 0-100 = grade 1, 101-200 = grade 2, and 201-300 = grade 3. Grade 2 or 3 tumors were considered to be positive for CSC markers and E-cadherin [35 (link)]. For Snail-1, tumors were considered positive when at least 10% of all tumor cells were immunoreactive [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunocytochemical Characterization of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with Triton 0.25%, and then blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline and 0.3% Triton™ X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. We incubated the cells with primary antibodies to NANOG (1:100, Abcam), SSEA-3 (1.100, Covance), ChAT (1:200, Chemicon and Millipore), SMI32 (1:500, Covance), hnRNP-Q (1:100, Sigma), and NRXN 2α (1:100, Abcam) overnight, and then with anti-rabbit, anti-mouse, or anti-goat Alexa Fluor® 488 or 594 (1:400; Life Technologies) secondary antibody for 1.5 h at room temperature. Negative controls were performed for all stains. Microphotographs were taken with a LEICA LCS2 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Characterization of Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded onto 12 mm coverslips in 24-well dishes and allowed for attachment. Cells were fixed in methanol, blocked in 3% BSA, and incubated with the following primary antibodies: Podoplanin (Santa Cruz, sc-376695), SPC1 (Santa Cruz, sc-13979), Ki67 (Abcam, ab15580), Nanog (Abcam, ab21624), β-catenin (Transduction Laboratories, #610154). After incubation with secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Jackson Immunoresearch, #115-545-003) or Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch, #111-585-144), nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Coverslips were mounted in Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent (Cell Signaling, #9071). Image acquisition was carried out using a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope and the MediaView software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunostaining of Pluripotent and Cardiac Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were plated on 20 mm coverslips and were fixed with 4% PFA for 20 minutes. Then, after washing with PBS three times for 10 minutes, the cells were successively treated with 0.2% Triton X‐100 (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 30 minutes, washed as above, and treated with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Solarbio) at room temperature. Primary antibodies included OCT4 (1:100, Abcam), SSEA‐4 (1:100, Santa Cruz), NANOG (1:100, Abcam), TRA‐1‐60 (1:100, Santa Cruz), TNNT2 (1:100, Santa Cruz), α‐actinin (1:100, abcam), CX43 (1:100, Santa Cruz) and γ‐H2A.X (1:200, Abcam). Cells were washed and then incubated for 45 minutes at RT in the dark with 1:200 Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies (Life Technology). Cells were washed again as above, mounted with Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI (4, 6‐diamino‐2‐phenylindole), and imaged using a Confocal Microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM 510 Meta).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence analysis of stem cell markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown on the surface of cover slides and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. After rehydration in PBS, the fixed cells were incubated with primary antibodies: γ-H2AX, β-catenin, active β-catenin and Nanog (Abcam) at room temperature for 1 h or at 4°C overnight. Alexa594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) or Alexa488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. The nuclei were stained with DAPI. Sections were examined by confocal microscopy (Olympus-FV1000, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining of Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min, and then incubated with blocking solution (PBS + 1% BSA) at 4°C for 30 min followed by primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Primary antibodies were diluted in Immnol Fluorence Staining Primary Antibody Dilution Solution (Beyotime, P0108) at the followings ratios: OCT4 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:500, Abcam), SOX2 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:500, Abcam), NANOG (rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:500, Abcam), SSEA4 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:500, Abcam), CD105 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:500, Abcam), β-Ⅲ-tubulin (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:500, Chemicon), AFP (mouse monoclonal antibody, 1:500, Chemicon), Desmin (mouse polyclonal antibody, 1:500, Abcam), Nestin (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:200, Chemicon), PDX1 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:500, Chemicon) and α-actin (rabbit monoclonal antibody, 1:200, Sigma). After washing three times with PBS, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 (donkey anti-mouse) or Alexa Fluor 546 (goat anti-rabbit) conjugated secondary antibody (1:500; Chemicon) for 1h at room temperature in the dark. Finally, DNA was stained with Hoechst33342 (Beyotime, C1005) for 3 min. Negative controls were processed the same way, except that the primary antibodies were replaced with blocking buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!