The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

61 protocols using snap cell tmr star

1

Pulse-labeling of Newly Synthesized Histones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For specific labelling of newly synthesised histones, pre-existing SNAP-tagged histones were first quenched by incubating cells with 10 μM of the non-fluorescent SNAP reagent (SNAP-cell Block, New England Biolabs) for 30 min at 37 °C followed by a 30 min wash in fresh medium and a 2 h chase. Cells were then locally irradiated with the UVC lamp and the SNAP-tagged histones neosynthesized during the chase time were pulse-labelled by incubating cells with a fluorescent SNAP reagent (2 μM SNAP-cell TMR star or 4 μM SNAP-cell Oregon green, New England Biolabs) for 15 min at 37 °C, followed by 45 min–1 h 45 min incubation in fresh medium. Cells were then processed for immunostaining. For cells harvested 24 h post irradiation, the quenching reagent was added again after the pulse step to avoid labelling of additional histones by free fluorescent SNAP reagent remaining in the cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Labeling Drosophila Larval Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For surface labeling: third instar larvae were dissected in Shields and Sang M3 Insect cell complete medium and incubated for 10 min at 25°C (or at 29°C for BAC (CH322-98K24) SNAP-smo experiments and 30°C for shits experiments) with the SNAP-Surface Alexa Fluor (NEB) in complete medium, then fixed 20 min at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde, and washed three times 10 min in PBS + 0.3% Triton (PBST). This was followed by immunolabeling.
For intracellular labeling: after surface labeling and fixation, discs were incubated with SNAP-Cell TMR-Star (NEB) and SNAP-Surface Block (NEB) for 20 min at 25°C (for intracellular labeling), followed by immunolabeling.
For immunolabeling, discs were incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C. They were then washed three times with PBST and incubated for 2 hr at RT with the secondary antibody in PBST before another three washes of 10 min in PBST. Discs were then mounted in Citifluor (Biovalley).
For the different concentrations and details on the chemicals used see Appendix 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Labeling Amyloid-beta with Fluorescent Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pSNAP-tag(m) plasmid, which was used as backbone, is available at Addgene (#101135). The transfection reagent TransIT-LT-1 was purchased from Mirus (Lot81023060) and the ncAA TCO*K (axial trans-cyclooct-2-ene–L–lysine; CAS 1801936-26-4) was purchased from SiChem. We used four fluorescent dyes for labeling. The SNAP-Cell® 647-SiR (S9102 S) and the SNAP-Cell® TMR-Star (S9105 S) were purchased from New England BioLabs and the 6-methyl-tetrazine-BDP-FL is produced by Jena Bioscience (RK011-001). The SiR-DNA kit (SC007) was purchased by Spirochrome. For detecting Aβ, we used the High sensitive IBL-ELISA: Amyloid-beta (1–42) (LOT. 1D-818) and Amplex® UltraRed from Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific. The 4–20% polyacrylamide Bis-Tris gels were purchased by BioRad. The cOmplete™, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail was purchased from Sigma (000000005056489001). The primary antibodies we used are the Anti-SNAP-tag® antibody (Polyclonal), (1 : 200) from New England BioLabs (P9310 S) and the Anti-β-Amyloid, 1–16, Clone: 6E10 (1 : 1000) from BioLegend (803001). The secondary antibodies are the IRDye 680RD Donkey anti-Rabbit (926-68073) and IRDye 800 CW Donkey anti-mouse (92632212) from LI-COR Biosciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pulse-labeling of newly-synthesized histones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For specific labeling of newly-synthesized histones, pre-existing SNAP-tagged histones were first quenched by incubating cells with 10 μM non-fluorescent SNAP reagent (SNAP-Cell Block, New England Biolabs) for 30 min (quench) followed by a 30 min-wash in fresh medium and a 2 h-chase. The SNAP-tagged histones neo-synthesized during the chase were then pulse-labeled by incubation with 2 μM red-fluorescent SNAP reagent (SNAP-Cell TMR-Star, New England Biolabs) for 15 min followed by 1h to 1h30-wash in fresh medium. Cells were pre-extracted with Triton detergent before fixation (see Immunofluorescence section for details). If cells were subject to local UVC irradiation, irradiation was performed immediately before the pulse. When transcription inhibitors were used, they were added to the medium at the quench step and kept throughout the experiment. For total labeling of SNAP-tagged histones, the quench step was omitted and cells were pulsed with SNAP-Cell TMR-Star immediately before harvesting. Total H2A.Z is also revealed by immunostaining with antibodies against H2A.Z amino- or carboxy-terminus (Nt/Ct)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dynein complex labeling efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNAPf–dynein complexes bound to IgG Sepharose 6 beads were incubated with approximately 5 μM SNAP-Cell TMR-Star or approximately 5 μM SNAP-Surface Alexa Fluor 647 (New England Biolabs) at 4°C for 40 min. Prior to TEV cleavage, excess dye was washed away with TEV buffer. Following purification of dynein complexes, labelling efficiency was determined using a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies) and shown to be 87–97% per dynein monomer for TMR and Alexa Fluor 647, respectively (equating to a labelling efficiency of 98.5 or 100% per dimeric dynein complex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescent Labeling of Sporulating Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (1 mL) were withdrawn from cultures in SMB at selected times during sporulation. Cells were collected by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 3 min), resuspended in 200 µL of phosphate saline buffer (PBS) and labeled by incubation with SNAP-cell TMR-star (New England Biolabs) for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark at a final concentration of 250 nM. This TMR-star-probed suspension was centrifuged (12,000 × g, 1 min), washed with 1 mL of PBS, suspended again in 1 mL of PBS and labeled with Mitotracker Green (MTG, Thermofischer) and/or FM4-64 Fx (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a final concentration of 1 µg/mL or in 100 nM MV405 for simultaneous visualization of YFP protein (Supplementary Fig. S1B) for 1 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed three times in PBS and suspended in 50–200 µL PBS, depending on the concentration of sporulating cells/spores. For diffraction-limited as well as super-resolved microscopy, 3 µL of the labeled cells suspension were applied onto 1.7% agarose in PBS-coated glass slides. All experiments were done at RT. Samples were imaged with a BX-61 (Olympus), Elyra PS.1 or Elyra 7 AxioObserver (Zeiss) microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Knock-in Cell Line Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T and HCT116 cells were transfected with sgRNA and donor vectors (1:3 by molarity) by Lipofectamine 3000(Thermofisher). 24 h after transfection, cells were sorted and GFP positive cells were collected. After 7 days’ culture, cells were treated with 3 μM SNAP-Cell TMR-Star (NEB S9105S) for 30 min, followed by wash. Cells were sorted and the TMR positive cells were collected into 96-well plates with 1 cell/well. 14 days after the single cell sorting, the colonies were screened for knock-in by genotyping and western blot with antibodies for RPL28(Abcam 138125). For H9 hESCs, linearized RPL28-SnapTag double stranded oligonucleotide (dsODN) donor was produced by PCR amplification from donor vector. H9 hESCs were electroporated with a NEPA21 Type II Super Electroporator (Bulldog-Bio) using the manufacturer’s recommended parameters. After electroporation, cells were collected in 2 mL of mTeSR Plus media supplemented with ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632). After 48 h, EGFP + cells were sorted and plated at a clonal density (1 × 103 cells/mL). Resulting colonies were manually isolated and expanded for genotyping and western blot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tracking Histone Dynamics by SNAP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS H3.3-SNAP cells were blocked with SNAP-Cell Block (New England Biolabs), subjected to UV-A micro-irradiation after which newly synthesized histones were labeled with SNAP-cell TMR star (New England Biolabs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SNAP-Tag Conjugation and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting and immunostaining were performed as previously described (Wen et al., 2019 (link)). For SNAP-tag conjugation, live cells were incubated with 3 μM SNAP-Cell TMR-Star (NEB) for 30 min, washed and recovered, then fixed and permeabilized before imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent Labeling and Microscopy of SNAP-tagged BAP1 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa-Kyoto cells were regularly maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and plated in the chamber-slide (µ-Slide; Ibidi) before transfection. The DNA sequences corresponding to BAP1 variants were subcloned into the pSNAP-tag vector, with an N-terminal SNAP-tag for fluorescence labeling.
Plasmids of SNAP-tagged BAP1 variants were transfected into cells using X-tremeGENE HP reagent (Roche). 2 d after transfection, exogeneous SNAP-tagged BAP1s were live-labeled with SNAP-Cell TMR-star (New England BioLabs), and nuclei were stained with Hoechest33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min. Labeled cells were transferred into the fresh medium and used for epifluorescent live-cell microscopy. Images were taken using a Leica DMI6000 microscope with an HCX PL FL 20×/0.40-NA CORR objective lens and an Andor Luca R EMCCD sensor. Integral fluorescent intensities of labeled BAP1 variants in the separate cellular compartments were processed and counted based on double-stained monochrome images using MetaMorph Multi-Wavelength cell scoring software application (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!