The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using mouse anti gfp

1

Western blot analysis of Bok, GFP, and actin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased in pro analysi grade from Merck KGaA (Germany) or Carl Roth GmbH. Antibodies for western blot were rabbit anti-Bok (Abcam; EPR15331), mouse anti-GFP (BioLegend; Clone B34) and rabbit anti-Tom20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; FL-145), mouse anti-β-actin (Sigma; clone AC74), anti-Mcl-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, H-260) anti-mouse-HRP and anti-rabbit-HRP (Jackson Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 4%–20% MOPS-acrylamide gels (GenScript Express Plus, M42012) and electrophoretically transferred onto PVDF membranes. Immunodetection was performed using the iBind Flex Western Device (Thermo Fisher, SLF2000). Antibodies were used at the following concentrations: 1:25,000 mouse anti-Actin (Chemicon/Bioscience Research Reagents, MAB1501), 1:500 mouse anti-ubiquitin (Santa Cruz, sc-8017), 1:2000 mouse anti-HA (BioLegend), 1:1000 mouse anti-mCherry (Invitrogen), and 1:500 mouse anti-GFP (BioLegend).
HRP secondary antibodies were used as follows: 1:500 to 1:1000 anti-mouse (BioRad, 170-6516), 1:500 to 1:1000 anti-rabbit (BioRad, 172-1019). Signal was detected using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific, 32106). Densitometry measurements were performed blind to genotype and condition using Fiji software [49 (link)]. Signal was normalized to Actin [114 (link), 115 (link)]. For comparisons involving a genetic manipulation, the value for the control genotype was then set at 1. Normalized immunoblot data were log2-transformed to stabilize variance, and means were compared using Student t test. Significant results were defined as increases of at least 1.25-fold or decreases of at least 0.8-fold with p < 0.05. Each experiment was performed using at least three independent biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoprecipitation of GFP and mCherry Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
7.5 μg of mouse anti‐GFP (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) or rabbit anti‐mCherry (Thermo Fisher Scientific) antibody were cross‐linked to 50 μL of magnetic Dynabeads protein G (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with BS3 cross‐linking reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per manufacturer's instruction. The incubation time was extended to 1 h at 4 °C, and the quenching was extended to 30 min. Lysates (500 μg of protein) were applied to the bead–antibody complex and allowed to incubate with rotation at 4 °C overnight. Beads were washed in triplicate with eight beads volumes of 1× TBS containing 0.1% Tween‐20 (TBS/Tween). The beads were resuspended in 100 μL of TBS/Tween and transferred to a fresh microcentrifuge tube to avoid eluting proteins bound to the tube wall. Immunoprecipitated proteins were released from the antibody bead complex by heating in 30 μL 1× SDS loading buffer and supernatant transferred to a fresh microcentrifuge tube.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!