In vivo recovery was evaluated using a retrodialysis method, which measured the loss (extraction ratio) of LTG via the probe.23 (link) Microdialysis probes were implanted for plasma and hippocampus sampling as described in the “LTG concentration in plasma sampled by microdialysis” and “LTG concentration in the hippocampus sampled by microdialysis” sections; 1 μg/mL and 25 ng/mL of LTG were flushed via the blood probe and brain probe, respectively. The perfusate (Cperf) and dialysate (Cdial) concentrations of LTG were determined using HPLC and UPLC–mass spectrometry (MS). In vivo relative recovery (Rdial) of LTG across the microdialysis probe was calculated by the following equation: Rdial = (Cperf − Cdial)/Cperf.
Mdn 0100
The MDN-0100 is a compact and versatile laboratory instrument designed for precise and consistent sample preparation. It features a fully automated liquid handling system that can perform a wide range of liquid handling tasks, including dilution, transfer, and pipetting. The MDN-0100 is suitable for use in various analytical applications, offering reliable and reproducible results.
Lab products found in correlation
2 protocols using mdn 0100
In Vivo Microdialysis Evaluation of LTG
In vivo recovery was evaluated using a retrodialysis method, which measured the loss (extraction ratio) of LTG via the probe.23 (link) Microdialysis probes were implanted for plasma and hippocampus sampling as described in the “LTG concentration in plasma sampled by microdialysis” and “LTG concentration in the hippocampus sampled by microdialysis” sections; 1 μg/mL and 25 ng/mL of LTG were flushed via the blood probe and brain probe, respectively. The perfusate (Cperf) and dialysate (Cdial) concentrations of LTG were determined using HPLC and UPLC–mass spectrometry (MS). In vivo relative recovery (Rdial) of LTG across the microdialysis probe was calculated by the following equation: Rdial = (Cperf − Cdial)/Cperf.
Skin Microdialysis Probe Implantation
Skin probe implantation: The rats with back hairs were shaved and fasted without water for a night before the experiment. The depilated rats were anesthetized intraperitoneal with 25% urethane (1 mL/100 g) (Hüske et al., 2016 (link)), and 2.5 cm of length was measured in the middle part of the skin on the back of the rats using a ruler. The probe implantation point and end point were marked with a marker pen, and a skin probe was used to guide the needle to puncture the skin. The skin probe was soaked with heparin sodium and inserted with the help of a guide needle. After the probe was implanted, the implant point and end point were fixed with a medical tape to prevent the probe from moving and the drugs from entering the damaged skin. To avoid the effect of tissue fluid, a flow rate of 1 μL·min−1 was used for blank perfusion (30% ethanol was diluted with normal saline) after probe implantation, and the tissue was balanced for 45 min to recover to normal level (Voelkner et al., 2019 (link)).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!