The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3d digitizer

Manufactured by Polhemus
Sourced in United States

The 3D digitizer is a device designed to capture the three-dimensional shape and position of physical objects. It accurately measures and records the spatial coordinates of an object's surface, allowing for the creation of digital representations or 3D models. The core function of the 3D digitizer is to gather precise data about the physical form of an object.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using 3d digitizer

1

Magnetoencephalography Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MEG recordings were obtained in the Magnetoencephalography Laboratory at the Florida Hospital for Children, with a 306-channel Elekta Neuromag TRIUX system in a three-layer magnetically shielded room (Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co, Germany), following recommended practices for conducting and reporting MEG research (Gross et al., 2013) . The MEG system consists in an array of 204 orthogonal planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers housed in a head-shaped helmet over 102 locations. During the recordings, participants were in supine position and their heads were covered by the MEG sensor array. Prior to MEG recordings, a 3D digitizer (Polhemus, VT, USA) was used to record the position of fiducial landmarks (i.e., nasion and preauricular points), five head-position-indicator (HPI) coils, and head shape. The individual position of each participant's head relative to the sensor helmet was determined at the beginning and at the end of the recording session, based on the five HPI coils. A closed-loop real-time noise cancellation ("MaxShield", Elekta Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland) was applied during the recordings, and data were acquired at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz with a 0.1-330 Hz band-pass filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Magnetoencephalography Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG acquisition was performed in a magnetically shielded and acoustically quiet room using a 204-channel whole-head planar-type gradiometer MEG system (Vector-view, ELEKTA, Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland) at the National Institute for Physiological Sciences (NIPS) in Okazaki. Before the MEG recordings, five head position indicator coils were attached to the participant's scalp, and a 3D digitizer (Polhemus Inc., Colchester, VT) was used to record the positions of the coils, three anatomical landmarks, including the nasion, bilateral pre-auricular points, and the head shape. A current was passed through the five head position indicator coils, and the resulting magnetic fields were used to evaluate the head position with reference to the MEG sensor. MEGs were filtered using a bandpass of 0.1–200 Hz and digitized at 1 kHz. Participants were comfortably seated upright during MEG measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Resting-state fNIRS of Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resting‐state fNIRS data were acquired with TechEn CW6 (Techen Inc., Milford, MA) system as depicted in Figure 1a. A total of four lasers sources with wavelengths at 690 nm and 830 nm and eight light detectors were used to generate 12 channels that covered the left and right lateral prefrontal cortex. The distance between each source and each detector was 3 cm as illustrated in Figure 1b. During the experiment, the participant wore a custom‐built head cap, which was made from plastic and Velcro. The sampling rate was 50 Hz and a total 10‐min resting‐state fNIRS data were acquired. While recording the data, all participants were required to stay still and keep their eyes closed without falling asleep.
After data acquisition, the three‐dimensional (3D) coordinates of each source and detector were measured by using a 3D digitizer (PATRIOT, Polhemus, Colchester, Vermont, USA). The mean 3D coordinates were then imported into NIRS‐SPM (Ye, Tak, Jang, Jung, & Jang, 2009) for spatial registration to generate the layout of optodes and MNI coordinates of each channel (Table 1). The 3D MNI coordinates of 12 channels were displayed in Figure 1c, which were visualized with BrainNet Viewer (Xia, Wang, & He, 2013).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Innocuous and Noxious Electrical Stimulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven healthy subjects were included in the study (right handed, male, 28 ± 5 (mean ± std) years old). Each subject gave informed written consent prior to the experiments. Subjects with a history of neurological trauma or psychiatric disorders, or who were unable to keep their head still, were excluded.
Prior to the actual experiment, electrical stimulation was applied to each subject's left thumb through electrodes with a 5 Hz electrical stimulator (Neurometer CPT, Neurotron, Baltimore, MD) to determine current levels that elicited subjective ratings of 3/10 (innocuous) and 7/10 (noxious) from each subject. The electrical stimulus was increased from baseline (0.7 mA) by 0.05 mA increments, while the subjects were expected to specify when the electrical stimulus reaches to a pain level of 3 (innocuous) and 7 (noxious) on a 0 to 10 scale. These current values were used in the actual experiment.
During the actual experiment, randomized innocuous and noxious electrical stimuli at 5 Hz were applied by a neurometer (Neurotron Inc. Baltimore, MD). Each stimulus lasted 5 seconds, followed by a 25 second rest. Each run lasted 12.5 minutes and consisted of 12 innocuous and 12 noxious stimuli which were randomly ordered (Figure 7, panel C).
Following the NIRS acquisition, the 3D positions of the sources and detectors were obtained using a 3D digitizer (Polhemus Inc., VT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Simultaneous MEG and EEG Data Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The simultaneous MEG and EEG data were collected at the BioMag Laboratory of the Helsinki University Central Hospital. The measurements were performed in an electrically and magnetically shielded room (ETS-Lindgren Euroshield, Eura, Finland) with Vectorview 306-channel MEG system (Elekta Neuromag, Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland) equipped with a compatible EEG system. The MEG system had 102 triple-sensor elements, each comprising two orthogonal planar gradiometers and one magnetometer. A 64-channel EEG electrode cap was used. The reference electrode was placed on the nose tip and the ground electrode was on the right cheek. Blinks, as well as vertical and horizontal eye movements, were measured with four electrodes attached above and below the left eye and close to the external eye corners on both sides. Four head position indicator coils were placed on top of the EEG cap. Their positions were determined with respect to the nasion and preauricular points by an Isotrak 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA). MEG and EEG data were recorded with a sample rate of 600 Hz.
During the measurement, subjects were comfortably seated and watched a silenced movie with subtitles. The stimuli were presented with Presentation software (Neurobehavioral Systems, Ltd.). The sound was delivered through a pair of pneumatic headphones at individually adjusted loudness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Magnetoencephalography Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were acquired using a 306 channel (204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers) Neuromag Vectorview system (Elekta AB, Stockholm) in a sound-attenuated and magnetically shielded room. Data were sampled at 1000 Hz with an online band-pass filter of 0.03–333 Hz. Five Head Position Indicator (HPI) coils were attached firmly to the EEG cap to track the head movements of the participant. The locations of the HPI coils as well as the EEG electrodes were recorded with a Polhemus 3D digitizer. We also measured three anatomical landmark points (nasion, left and right preauricular points) and additional points on the head to indicate head shape and enable matching to each individual's structural MRI scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Magnetoencephalography Data Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were acquired using a 306 channel (204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers) Neuromag Vectorview system (Elekta AB, Stockholm) in a sound-attenuated and magnetically shielded room. Data were sampled at 1000 Hz with an online band-pass filter of 0.03–333 Hz. Five Head Position Indicator (HPI) coils were attached firmly to the EEG cap to track the head movements of the participant. The locations of the HPI coils as well as the EEG electrodes were recorded with a Polhemus 3D digitizer. We also measured three anatomical landmark points (nasion, left and right preauricular points) and additional points on the head to indicate head shape and enable matching to each individual’s structural MRI scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Brain Imaging with MEG and MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG signals were recorded using a 306-channel Neuromag Vectorview MEG system (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Anatomical images were obtained using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieve, Philips N.V., Eindhoven, the Netherlands) for analysis and interpretation of MEG data (TE, 60 ms; TR, 100 ms; voxel size, 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm3). Magnetic fields were recorded continuously at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz with a bandpass filter of 0.1–330 Hz. Before each recording, four head-position indicator (HPI) coils attached to the scalp and a 3D digitizer (FastTrack, Polhemus, VT, USA) were used to measure anatomical landmarks (nasion, and left and right auricular points) of the head, the HPI positions, and approximately 200 head-surface points34 (link). During the recording, participants were positioned in a quiet magnetically shielded room with their head inside the helmet-shaped sensor array. During each run, continuous HPI (cHPI) measurement was performed using the four HPI coils.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Neuroimaging of Overt Speech

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were measured using a Vectorview whole‐head MEG device (Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland) comprising 306 channels, organized in 102 triplet sensor elements in a helmet‐shaped array (two planar gradiometers and one magnetometer at each triplet site). Vertical and horizontal electro‐oculogram (EOG) signals were recorded for identifying and rejecting epochs contaminated by eye blinks and saccades. EMG signals were measured to monitor mouth movements with two electrodes placed near the upper and lower lip margins. The overt speech responses were recorded. Four head position indicator coils were used to determine the head position with respect to the sensor array, and the position of these coils with respect to three anatomical landmarks (the preauricular points and nasion) were found with a 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT). This information was then used to align the MEG results with the individual anatomical magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Head position was measured at the beginning of each session (i.e., four times during the course of the experiment). The MEG signals were filtered at 0.03–200 Hz and sampled at 600 Hz.
MRIs were acquired with a Signa VH/i 3.0 T MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK) using a standard T1‐weighted 3D spoiled‐gradient echo sequence. If available, previously acquired T1‐weighted anatomical images were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Magnetoencephalography Protocol for Visual Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following procedures previously described in (6 (link)), participants were first tested for possible magnetic artifacts in a short preliminary MEG run. The MEG recordings were carried out using a 275-channel whole-head MEG system (CTF/VMS, Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada) with a sampling rate of 1200 Hz, a 0- to150-Hz filter bandwidth, and third-order spatial gradient noise cancellation. Concurrent horizontal and vertical electrooculograms (EOG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were acquired with bipolar montages. Head position was determined with coils fixated at the nasion and the preauricular points (fiducial points). The positions of the fiducial coils were measured relative to the participant’s head using a 3D digitizer (Polhemus Isotrack). About 150 additional scalp points were also digitized. Head position was monitored continuously (sampling rate: 150 Hz) and verified for consistency between blocks to ensure that head movements did not exceed 0.5 cm (this was confirmed by additional offline verification before further data analyses). Participants were seated upright in a sound-attenuated, magnetically shielded recording room and passively observed the visual stimuli projected on a screen. They were asked to keep their eyes open. The duration of experiment 1 was 15 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!