The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using chemostar imaging system

1

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total protein was extracted with a buffer that contained 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodiumdeoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and 50 mM Tris that was supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Penzberg, Germany). The total protein content was measured using a protein quantitation assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The total protein (20 µg) was loaded onto 10% denaturing SDS gel and transferred to 0.45 mm polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) for immunoblotting. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk (Sigma-Aldrich) and probed with primary antibodies against VCAM-1, β-Actin, p-AKT, AKT, p-eNOS and eNOS, followed by horseradish peroxidase–labeled secondary antibodies. Proteins were detected using a chemiluminescence substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA). The results were documented on a Chemo-star imaging system (INTAS, Göttingen, Germany). The signal intensity of the chemiluminescence was quantified using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from six-well plates with 500 µl ice-cold RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 1% v/v Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 140 mM NaCl) supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM Pefabloc, 1 ng/µl aprotinin/leupeptin, 10 mM BGP, 1 mM NEM). Protein samples were then sonicated three times for five cycles (30 s ON/30 s OFF) in a Bioruptor Pico (Diagenode, Belgium). Lysates were then mixed with Lämmli buffer (6 × , 375 mM Tris–HCl, 10% SDS, 30% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 9.3% DTT) and cooked for 5 min at 95 °C. Same amounts of protein per sample were then separated using 10–12% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Immobilon, Millipore, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk in TBS-T and incubated overnight at 4 °C with specific primary antibodies diluted in the same blocking solution. Next, membranes were washed with TBS-T, incubated 1 h with secondary antibodies (Dianova GmbH, Germany) diluted in blocking buffer, washed again with TBS-T and finally developed using HRP substrate (Cyanogen WESTAR) in a ChemoStar imaging system (INTAS science imaging, Germany). Antibody list in Additional file 1: Table S6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis in GBM Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM cells were subjected to lysis using a buffer containing Triton X-100 along with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Cell Signaling Technology). The lysates were cleared by cellular debris through centrifugation and then mixed with a loading buffer containing 4% glycerin, 0.8% SDS, 1.6% beta-mercaptoethanol, and 0.04% bromophenol blue (all from Carl Roth). The proteins were electrophoretically separated by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to Immobilon-P (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) or Roti®-Fluoro (Carl Roth) PVDF membranes using a semidry blotting device (Biometra FastblotTM, Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-PGRMC1, anti-TCF 1/7, anti-beta-Actin (all from Cell Signaling Technology), or anti-ITGB1 (Proteintech, Manchester, UK). Subsequent secondary reactions were carried out for 1 h at room temperature with HRP-, AlexaFluor®488-, or AlexaFluor®647-coupled antibodies (all from Cell Signaling Technology). All antibodies were diluted in SignalBoost™ Immunoreaction Enhancer (Merck Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The ChemoStar imaging system (Intas Science Imaging, Göttingen, Germany) was used for the detection and acquisition of signals and the intensity of the bands was quantified with the ImageJ 1.48v software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of GBM Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM cells were lysed with a commercially available buffer containing Triton X-100 and protease/phosphatase inhibitors (both from Cell Signaling Technology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the lysates were incubated with an SDS-Loading buffer containing 4% glycerin, 0.8% SDS, 1.6% beta-mercaptoethanol and 0.04% bromophenol blue (all from Carl Roth). Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by transfer to Immobilon-P (Merck Millipore) or Roti®-Fluoro (Carl Roth) PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-Catenin D1, anti-CD44, anti-CD99 (from Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MT1-MMP and anti-PLOD2 (from Proteintech) overnight at 4 °C. Secondary reactions were performed for 1h at room temperature using HRP-, AlexaFluor®488- or AlexaFluor®647-coupled antibodies (all from Cell Signaling Technology). All antibodies were diluted as recommended by the respective manufacturer using the SignalBoost™ Immunoreaction Enhancer Kit (Merck Millipore). Signal detection was performed on a ChemoStar imaging system (Intas Science Imaging, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis in HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5x105 HUVECs were plated in 60 mm dishes (Corning) in 4 ml EGM per well and grown till confluency. Cells were starved as mentioned before. After starvation, cells were stimulated with conditioned media with or without adalimumab (1 μg/mL) for 6 hours. IgG (1 μg/mL) was used as isotype control. Total protein was extracted with buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Penzberg, Germany). Total protein content was measured using the BCA kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to manufactures protocol. 30 μg of total protein was loaded onto 10% denaturing SDS gel and transferred to 0.45 μm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, UK) for immunoblotting. Membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk, (Sigma-Aldrich) and probed with primary antibody against proteins of interest followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labelled secondary antibody. Proteins were detected using chemiluminescence substrate (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, USA). Results were documented on a Chemo-star imaging system (INTAS, Göttingen, Germany). Signal intensity of chemiluminescence was quantified using Quantity One software (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Profiling Macrophage Inflammatory Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Supernatants from THP-1 macrophages after stimulation with oxLDL and with or without adalimumab (1 μg/mL) were analyzed with commercially available protein array for human cytokines and growth factor related to inflammation according to the manufacturer’s instructions (RayBiotech, Norcross, GA). Briefly, antibody array membranes were blocked for 30 min with blocking buffer followed by incubation with 1 mL of undiluted supernatants overnight at 4°C. After washing, membranes were incubated with detection antibody cocktail overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with HRP-streptavidin for again overnight at 4°C. Membranes were developed using chemiluminescence detection method and results were documented on a Chemo-star imaging system (INTAS). Signal intensity of chemiluminescence was quantified using Quantity One software (BioRad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Protein Synthesis Rates Using Puromycin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
puromycin becomes covalently incorporated into nascent peptide chains, which can be used as readout for the rate of translation [67 (link),106 (link),107 (link)]. We verified that low puromycin concentrations (1 μg mL-1) do not perturb growth or lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in cellular protein aggregates, which can be visualized as using the previously established YocM-mCherrry fusion protein (S10A–S10C Fig) [48 (link),108 (link)]. Strains were grown in LB medium and treated as indicated. For in vivo labeling, 10 mL medium were separated, supplemented with 1 μg mL-1 puromycin (Roth) and incubated for 15 min at the same conditions. Then, samples were supplemented with 25 μg mL-1 chloramphenicol, harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 3,860 x g at 4 °C, washed in TE buffer (10 mM TRIS-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and disrupted by sonication in TE supplemented with 1 mM PMSF. Equal amounts of protein were directly spotted on nitrocellulose membranes (5 μg) or subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blotting [91 ]. puromycin-signals were detected using monoclonal anti-puromycin antibody (1:10,000, Merck), HRP-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:10,000, Roth) and the ECL-system in a ChemoStar imaging system (Intas, Göttingen, Germany). Signals were analyzed using Fiji distribution of ImageJ [109 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein detection and quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were grown in LB medium and treated as indicated, harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 3,860 x g at 4 °C, washed in TE buffer (10 mM TRIS-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and disrupted by sonication in TE supplemented with 1 mM PMSF. Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with coomassie or subjected to western blotting [103 (link)–105 (link)]. For signal detection, polyclonal α-Hpf antibody (1:5,000) [71 (link)] or monoclonal anti-puromycin antibody (1:10,000, Merck) and HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies (1:10,000, Roth) were used in conjunction with the ECL-system as described previously [17 (link)]. Images were acquired using a ChemoStar Imaging System (Intas, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!