The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbitrap elite mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, Canada

The Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer is a high-resolution, high-accuracy mass spectrometry instrument. It utilizes Orbitrap technology to provide precise mass measurements and detailed structural information about molecules. The Orbitrap Elite is designed for applications that require advanced analytical capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

150 protocols using orbitrap elite mass spectrometer

1

Cholesterol Photolabeling of GLIC Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified GLIC (70 μg) was exposed to UV light in the presence of 100 μM cholesterol photolabeling analogues for 5 min. Photolabeled protein (20 μg) was used for middle-down MS and 50 μg was used for intact protein MS analysis. For middle-down MS sample preparation, BioRad Biospin 6 columns were used for removing salts. The proteins were then reduced, alkylated and digested with trypsin at 4 °C for one week. The resultant peptides were analyzed with an OrbiTrap ELITE mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as previously described.26 (link) The data generated by middle-down MS was searched with the adduct weight of the various cholesterol analogue photolabeling reagents (i.e. minus N2) against a database containing GLIC sequence using PEAKS studio software. For intact protein MS analysis, the photolabeled protein was precipitated with CH3Cl:MeOH:H2O in a 1:1:1 ratio and resuspended in formic acid. Formic acid was diluted to <5% with 4:4:1 CH3Cl:MeOH:H2O and directly injected into a Thermo™ OrbiTrap ELITE mass spectrometer. A spray voltage of 4 kV, capillary temperature of 320 °C, and insource dissociation of 30 V was used. Full spectra were acquired in the linear trap quadrupole. Spectra were deconvoluted using Unidec software.35
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histone Peptide Analysis by nanoLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The histone peptides were analyzed using a nanoLC-MS/MS setup. Briefly, the nanoLC (EASY-nLC, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) was equipped with a 75 μm ID × 25 cm Reprosil-Pur C18-AQ (3 μm; Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany) in-house packed column, and coupled online with an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo). The HPLC gradient was as follows: 2% to 28% solvent B (A = 0.1% formic acid; B = 95% MeCN, 0.1% formic acid) over 45 minutes, from 28% to 80% solvent B in 5 minutes, 80% B for 10 minutes at a flow-rate of 300 nL/min. Data were acquired by an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) using a data-dependent acquisition (DDA). The Full MS scan was acquired at 60,000 resolution, while fragmentation was performed in the ion trap using collision-induced dissociation (CID) set at 35. Fragment ions were detected in the ion trap. Isobaric peptides (i.e., same mass, different modification position) were targeted for MS/MS fragmentation at every cycle, to ensure accurate extracted ion chromatography of discriminatory fragment ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histone Peptide Analysis by nanoLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The histone peptides were analyzed using a nanoLC-MS/MS setup. Briefly, the nanoLC (EASY-nLC, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) was equipped with a 75 μm ID × 25 cm Reprosil-Pur C18-AQ (3 μm; Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany) in-house packed column, and coupled online with an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo). The HPLC gradient was as follows: 2% to 28% solvent B (A = 0.1% formic acid; B = 95% MeCN, 0.1% formic acid) over 45 minutes, from 28% to 80% solvent B in 5 minutes, 80% B for 10 minutes at a flow-rate of 300 nL/min. Data were acquired by an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) using a data-dependent acquisition (DDA). The Full MS scan was acquired at 60,000 resolution, while fragmentation was performed in the ion trap using collision-induced dissociation (CID) set at 35. Fragment ions were detected in the ion trap. Isobaric peptides (i.e., same mass, different modification position) were targeted for MS/MS fragmentation at every cycle, to ensure accurate extracted ion chromatography of discriminatory fragment ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Orbitrap-based Proteomics Workflow for Phosphopeptide Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-gel samples were digested with chymotrypsin at 25°C for 18 h. Peptides were extracted and desalted before being injected into a nano-liquid chromatography with tandem MS (LC/MS/MS) system where an Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Thermo-Dionex) was coupled to an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) via an Easy-Spray ion source (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated on a ES802 Easy-Spray column (75-μm inner diameter, 25 cm in length, 3-μm C18 beads; Thermo Scientific) with a 25-min linear gradient of 2–27% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 2% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid; mobile phase B: 98% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). The HPLC flow rate was 300 nl/min.
Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer was operated in positive data-dependent LC-MS/MS mode. The resolution of the survey scan was set at 60k at m/z 400. The m/z range for MS scans was 300–1600. For MS/MS data acquisition, the decision-tree mode was activated, the minimum signal intensity required to trigger MS/MS scan was 1e4, the top ten most abundant ions were selected for product ion analysis, the isolation width was 1.9 m/z, and the dynamic exclusion window was 9 s.
Xcalibur RAW files were converted to peak list files in mgf format using Mascot Distiller. Database search was performed using Mascot Daemon (2.4.0) against NCBInr_Human database. Spectra of phosphopeptides were manually checked.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identification of cGAS Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293A cells were infected with lentivirus expressing SFB-tagged cGAS or an empty vector for 48 h, then infected with HSV-1 for 10 h (MOI = 3) or mock-infected. The cells were lysed with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% DOC, 0.1% SDS, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA) containing a complete protease inhibitor cocktail, followed by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were subjected to immunoprecipitation using S-protein agarose (Millipore, Cat# 69704). Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. The entire lane was cut into 2-mm gel slices, digested with Trypsin, and subjected to LC-MS/MS assays using an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mass spectrometry data were analyzed using Thermo Proteome Discovery (version 2.3), and tandem mass spectra were searched against the UniProt-Homo sapiens database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phosphopeptide Fractionation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphopeptide samples were fractionated followed a described protocol46 (link). Vacuum-dried peptides were dissolved in pH 10 buffer (10 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 10, adjusted by NH4OH) and subjected to pH 10 C18 reverse-phase column chromatography. Peptides were eluted with a step gradient of 150 μL each of 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, and 35% ACN (pH 10), pooled into six pools and vacuum-dried for nano-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem MS.
Peptides were loaded onto a 10-cm column with a 150-μM inner diameter, packed in-house with 1.9 μM C18, and subjected to nano-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem MS analysis by using a nano-LC 1000 coupled with an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). The peptides were separated with a 75-min discontinuous gradient of 2–24%, 4–24%, or 8–26% ACN/0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 800 nL/minute. The mass spectrometer was set to data-dependent mode, the precursor MS spectrum was scanned at 375–1300 m/z with 240k resolution at 400 m/z (2 × 106 AGC target), and the 25 strongest ions were fragmented via collision-induced dissociation with 35 normalized collision energy and 1 m/z isolation width and detected by using an ion trap with 30 s of dynamic exclusion time, 1 × 104 AGC target, and 100 ms of maximum injection time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identifying ACSS2-Interacting Proteins and Mapping Acetylation Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify ACSS2-interacting proteins, immunoprecipitates of ARP-1 cells infected with or without FLAG-tagged human ACSS2 were affinity captured by anti-Flag agarose beads and digested by trypsin. The tryptic peptides were then analyzed using a nano–liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with an 1100 series high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent Technologies). The MS/MS spectra were searched using the SEQUEST software program with the BioWorks Browser (version 3.3.1; Thermo Fisher Scientific) against the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.
To map the acetylation sites in IRF4, HA-IRF4 was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA agarose beads from infected ARP-1 cells treated with or without ACSS2i. The immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the Coomassie blue-stained band corresponding to IRF4 was extracted and subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion. The resulting peptides were analyzed using high-sensitivity LC-MS/MS with an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were identified by searching the fragment spectra against the Swiss-Prot protein database using the Mascot search engine (version 2.3; Matrix Science) via the Proteome Discoverer software program (version 1.4; Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CopA(Z) Purification and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified protein (∼100 μg) was precipitated with cold acetone to remove salts and re-suspended in 4% SDS prior to the addition of GELFREE loading buffer. Separation was performed as described (Tran and Doucette, 2009 (link)) using a 10% gel on a commercial GELFREE 8100 system (Expedeon, Cambridge, UK). The fraction containing CopA(Z) was isolated and SDS was removed using the methanol-chloroform-water method (Wessel and Flugge, 1984 (link)). After SDS removal, proteins were resuspended in 40 μL solvent A (94.9% H2O, 5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) and 5 μL were injected onto a trap column (150 μm ID × 3 cm) coupled with a nanobore analytical column (75 μm ID × 15 cm). The trap and analytical column were packed with polymeric reverse phase media (5 μm, 1,000 Å pore size) (PLRPS, Phenomenex). Samples were separated using a linear gradient of solvent A and solvent B (4.9% water, 95% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) over 60 minutes. MS data were obtained on an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) fitted with a custom nanospray ionization source. Intact mass spectrometry data were obtained at a resolving power of 120,000 (m/z 400). The top 2 m/z species were isolated within the Velos ion trap and fragmented using higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD). Data were analyzed with ProSightPC against a custom CopA database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of METTL13 Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type and METTL13-depleted T3M4 cells were grown in SILAC media containing either normal amino acids
(‘light’) or modified amino acids (‘heavy”) for two weeks and lysed in RIPA buffer with 1 mM PMSF
and protease inhibitor cocktail. A 2-way experiment was performed – the ‘forward’ condition combining
light WCE + METTL13 with heavy WCE - METTL13 and the ‘reverse’ condition combining heavy WCE + METTL13 with
light WCE - METTL13 at a ratio of 1:1 by mass. 10 μg of the lysates of each pair were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained
using a SilverQuest Silver Staining Kit. Gel pieces were treated with DTT and iodoacetamide as described above. In-gel
digestion was performed using 25 ng/μL trypsin followed by purification using C18 stage tips. To best extract the
methylated peptides from the entire proteome, the resulting digestion products were analyzed on an Orbitrap Elite mass
spectrometer and an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Data obtained from the two instruments were
combined and processed using MaxQuant version 1.3.0.5 (Cox and Mann, 2008 (link)) and allowing
as variable modifications – methionine oxidation; mono- and di-methylation of arginine; and mono-, di- and
tri-methylation of lysine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pepsin Digestion and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pepsin digestion and LC-MS analysis was done as described previously (30 (link), 31 (link)). Briefly, frozen samples were loaded onto a cryogenic autosampler and then were thawed for 60 s at 5 °C before being loaded onto an immobilized pepsin column (16-μl bed volume) at a flow rate of 20 μl/min to allow digestion of proteins. Pepsin-generated peptide fragments were collected on a C18 trap column (0.2 × 1 mm, Optimize Tech Inc., Oregon City, OR) for desalting, and flowed through a reverse phase C18 column (0.2 × 50 mm, MAC-MOD Analytical Inc., Chadds Ford, PA) for fragment separation using a linear acetonitrile gradient (6.4–38.4%) over 30 min. The eluent was directed into the OrbiTrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for MS analysis. Peptide identification was done by using Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (30 (link), 31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!