The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Miniscope tm 1000

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

The Miniscope TM-1000 is a compact and versatile electron microscope designed for high-resolution imaging of small samples. It features a high-intensity electron beam and advanced optics to provide detailed visualization of microscopic structures. The Miniscope TM-1000 is a self-contained, benchtop instrument suitable for a variety of laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using miniscope tm 1000

1

Transgenic RNAi Fly Lines for Gene Silencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic RNAi fly lines bearing UAS-IR-TBPH #1 (#38379), UAS-IR-TBPH #2 (#38377), UAS-IR-Maleless (#19691), UAS-IR-nonA (#26442), UAS-IR-DmRH1 (#46933), UAS-IR-Caz (100291), UAS-IR-Hrb87F (#100732) and UAS-IR-Hrb98DE (#29523) were obtained from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC) and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University (BDSC). The level of knockdown of TBPH in the #38379 line was reported to be an approximately 23% reduction compared with that in wild-type flies (Lin et al., 2011 (link)). Transgenic fly lines bearing UAS-EGFP (#6658, #6874), elav-GAL4 (#458) and UAS-IR-GFP (#9330) were obtained from BDSC. The transgenic fly line bearing GMR-GAL4 has been described previously (Yamaguchi et al., 1999 (link)). The genotypes of the fly lines used are described in Supplemental Table 3. All experiments were performed at 25 °C unless otherwise stated. Eye phenotypes of 1–2-day-old flies were evaluated with the stereoscopic microscope model SZX10 (Olympus) and a scanning electron microscope (Miniscope TM1000; Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation.).
The fly lines were allocated to experimental groups based on genotype, equivalent age and gender. Where multiple groups of the same genotype were required, these were allocated randomly to the particular experimental conditions. Sample sizes were estimated using pilot experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Determining Shell Whorls and Radulae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of number of shell whorls (precision to 0.25 whorl) follows Kerney and Cameron (1979 : 13). Shells and radulae were directly observed without coating under a low vacuum SEM (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo). Individual buccal masses were removed and soaked in 2 M KOH solution for 5 h before extracting the radula, which was preserved in 70% ethanol. We use the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the central of the body.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Morphological Analysis of Composite Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of TSG particles and LLDPE/CaCO3 and TSG/LLDPE/CaCO3 composite films was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at accelerating voltages of 10–15 kV. Samples were sputter-coated with platinum-palladium for SEM analyses and observed in a magnification range from 100× to 1000×. The sizes of TSG particles and the pores of microporous composite films were measured from the SEM micrographs. To obtain the mean size, at least 100–150 particles and pores were selected randomly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Imaging of Expanded Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For taking photographs of expanded images of BL, WB, and CL, we used SEM (MINISCOPE TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Ltd.). We observed each sample at 100- to 500-fold magnification on the SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Shell and Radula Morphometry of Gastropod

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of number of shell whorls (precision to 0.25 whorl) follows Kerney and Cameron (1979 : 13). The radulae of two specimens were examined. Individual desiccated bodies were soaked in 2 M KOH solution overnight before extracting the radula, which was preserved in 70 % ethanol. Shells, operculae and radulae were directly observed without coating under a low vacuum SEM (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo). Measurements of the shell were taken as follows:
shell width diameter of the penultimate whorl perpendicular to coiling axis;
shell height length from apical tip to the edge of the basal section of the peristome parallel to coiling axis;
aperture height length from upper palatal to basal section of peristome parallel to coiling axis.
The mostly widely used terms were used in the descriptions, with the exception of the following: “post-constriction bay” refers to the widened area just anterior to operculum; “neck region” indicates the part of the body whorl on the opposite (“back”) side of the aperture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopic Shell Analysis of Microgastropods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shells were first wetted in a dish of water and then manually brushed clean of mud using fine, tapered brushes, whereby each specimen was gently rotated back and forth between the brushes until it was sediment free. The shells were viewed without coating under a low vacuum SEM (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo). Shell whorl number was counted to the nearest quarter whorl according to Kerney and Cameron (1979) .
Measurements of Angustopila and Hypselostoma specimens were taken from images obtained by a Nikon Digital Sight DS-FI1 microscope camera attached to a Nikon SMZ 800 Zoom Stereomicroscope. Krobylos specimens were measured using digital Vernier callipers. For the species descriptions, shell measurements are expressed as ratios such as SW/SH and AW/AH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Shell Morphometric Analysis of Gastropods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shell whorls were counted according to Kerney and Cameron (1979: 13) (precision 0.25).
For the nomenclature of lamellae (vertical parietal folds) and plicae (horizontal parietal folds and palatal folds) see Páll-Gergely et al. 2015b (link). Whenever possible, the internal lamellae and plicae were exposed by removing the shell wall at the appropriate part of the shells (inner view). If damaging the shells was not an option (too few shells available), the plicae were figured on the basis of their visibility through the shell wall (outer view). “Anterior” refers to the part or side of the armature closer to the aperture, “posterior” refers to the other side of the armature.
Ethanol-preserved specimens were dissected under a Leica stereomicroscope, equipped with a photographic camera. In the descriptions of the reproductive system, we used the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the apical portion of the reproductive tract i.e. the ovotestis.
Individual buccal masses were removed and soaked in 2 M KOH solution for 5 hours before extracting the radula, which was later preserved in 70% ethanol. Radulae and shells were directly observed without coating under a low vacuum SEM (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

New Ecuadorian Land Snail Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The two new Ecuadorian species were compared with the holotype of Zilchistrophiatridentata (“C-Peru, Pichita Caluga, 2200 m, im Canchamayo-Becken”, leg. Weyrauch 18.08.1959., SMF 162006), and the original descriptions and photos of the other two Peruvian species. Ethanol-preserved specimens were dissected under Leica stereomicroscope, a camera on which provided photographs. To describe the reproductive system, we used the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the centre of the body.
The buccal mass was removed and soaked in 2 molar KOH solution for 5 hours before extracting radula, which was preserved in 70% ethanol. Radulae were directly observed without coating under a low vacuum SEM (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo).
The nomenclature of plicae follow Páll-Gergely and Hunyadi (2013) : horizontal folds (=parallel with the suture) are called plicae, whereas vertical folds (=perpendicular to the suture) are named lamellae.
The geographical coordinates of localities mentioned in this paper are the following: Chuintsa 02°00.891'S, 076°40.866'W; Nuevo Corrientes 01°59.870'S, 076°45.968'W.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Eostrobilops Land Snails

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nomenclature for the armature follows that of Pilsbry (1927) . Scanning electron microscopy was undertaken on uncoated shells under a low vacuum SEM (Miniscope TM-1000, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo). We counted shell whorls (to the nearest quarter of a whorl) following Kerney and Cameron (1979) .
Comparative material.Eostrobilopshirasei, Korea, Quelpart (= Cheju Island), det. Zilch (?), NHMUK 1909.2.20.112.114.; Eostrobilopsnipponica (labelled as matsushimae), Japan, Uzen, NHMUK 1912.6.28.19–20, NHMUK 1912.6.29.32–34; Eostrobilopscoreana, 朝鮮京城府北渓山 (probably Cho-Sen Kei-Joh-Fu, Hoku-Kei-Zan), Sakurai collection, NSMT/2; Eostrobilopskanjiokuboi, 中華民国 (台湾) 南投県信義郷東埔楽々温泉, Lo lo uen chuan, Tung-pu, Hsin-i shiang, Nan tou hsien, Taiwan, NSMT 69652/1 paratype; Eostrobilopsdiodontina, China, Tchen-k’eou, leg. Farges, excoll Musée Heude, 03.01.1946, MCZ, 167133 (photos of a syntype were received from Jochen Gerber). We could not examine most Eostrobilops types during our visit to the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan (11–13 March, 2015), because they were on loan. The comparisons of Eostrobilopshumicolus sp. n. with Eostrobilopsinfrequens and Eostrobilopstriptychus were based on the original descriptions of these species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of PNIPAM Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the PNIPAM nanoparticles coated on the resonator surface were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Miniscope TM-1000; Hitachi High-Technologies, Shenzhen, China) and a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (S-5500; Hitachi High-Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!