The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using velos pro orbitrap elite

1

Muscle Proteome Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle lysate protein (80 µg total protein) was separated on 4–20% TGX Criterion gradient SDS polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, Berkeley, CA) and processed for mass spectrometry, as previously described (12 (link)). Mass spectrometry (liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry [LC-ESI-MS/MS]) was performed on a Thermo Electron (San Jose, CA) Orbitrap Elite Velos Pro fitted with an EASY source (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA). NanoLC was performed using a DIONEX/Thermo NCS-3500RS UltiMate 3000 with an EASY Spray column (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA; 50 cm × 75 μm inner diameter, packed with PepMap RSLC C18 material, 2 μm). A “top 15” data-dependent MS/MS analysis was performed (acquisition of a full-scan spectrum followed by collision-induced dissociation mass spectra of the 15 most abundant ions in the survey scan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-ESI-MS/MS for Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-ESI-MS/MSn was performed on a Thermo Electron Orbitrap Elite Velos Pro fitted with an EASY source (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA). NanoLC was performed using a DIONEX/Thermo NCS-3500RS UltiMate 3000 with an EASY Spray column (Thermo Electron, 50cm × 75-um inner diameter, packed with PepMap RSLC C18 material, 2 um); loading phase for 15 min; mobile phase, linear gradient of 1–37% ACN in 0.1% FA in 150 min, followed by a step to 95% ACN in 0.1% FA over 5 min, hold 10 min, and then a step to 1% ACN in 0.1% FA over 1 min and a final hold for 19 min (total run 200 min); Buffer A = 0.1% FA in 100% H2O; Buffer B = 0.1% FA in 100% ACN; flow rate, 300 nl/min. All solvents were mass spectrometry grade. A “top 15” data-dependent MS/MS analysis was performed (acquisition of a full scan spectrum followed by collision-induced dissociation mass spectra of the 15 most abundant ions in the survey scan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-ESI-MS/MSn was performed on a Thermo Electron Orbitrap Elite Velos Pro fitted with an EASY source (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA). NanoLC was performed using a DIONEX/Thermo NCS-3500RS UltiMate 3000 with an EASY Spray column (Thermo Electron, 50 cm×75-µm inner diameter, packed with PepMap RSLC C18 material, 2 μm); loading phase for 15 min; mobile phase, linear gradient of 1–37% ACN in 0.1% FA in 150 min, followed by a step to 95% ACN in 0.1% FA over 5 min, hold 10 min, and then a step to 1% ACN in 0.1% FA over 1 min and a final hold for 19 min (total run 200 min); Buffer A=0.1% FA in 100% H2O; Buffer B=0.1% FA in 100% ACN; flow rate, 300 nl/min. All solvents were mass spectrometry grade. A “top 15″ data-dependent MS/MS analysis was performed (acquisition of a full scan spectrum followed by collision-induced dissociation mass spectra of the 15 most abundant ions in the survey scan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry measurements were performed by using nano-ESI-FTMS. Samples were injected into nanospray capillaries from New Objective Inc. (Woburn, MA, USA) with an inner tip diameter of 2 mm and analyzed with a Velos Pro Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,Waltham, MA, USA). The temperature of the transfer capillary was fixed at 240 °C. All measurements were performed in the positive ionization mode with an applied voltage to the nanospray capillary of 3 kV. The voltages applied to the S-Lens and multipoles were automatically tuned to favour the transmission of high m/z values. Full MS spectra were recorded using the Orbitrap analyzer, by averaging at least 110 scans in the range of m/z 2000–4000. Acquisition and treatment of the data was done with the Xcalibur software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of Transgenic Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 3 g leaf tissues from 20‐d‐old 35S‐USL1‐MYC and 35S‐VPS30‐FLAG transgenic plants were ground in liquid N2. The proteins were extracted and purified using the method described previously by Li et al. (2015). The purified proteins were separated using SDS‐PAGE. The entire gel lane was excised and dehydrated. Proteins were digested in‐gel with nedoproteinase trypsin (0.5 ng μl−1 trypsin in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.5). The extracted peptides were sequenced by LC‐MS/MS using a Velos Pro Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a nano‐ESI source. The IPI (International Protein Index) Arabidopsis protein database was used as a searching platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometry Protocol for Metabolome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution measurements were obtained with a VelosPro Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) fitted with a heated electrospray ionization source operating in positive and negative ionization modes. The mass spectrometer settings were as previously reported [116 (link)]. Collision-induced dissociation spectra (CID) in resonant excitation conditions were acquired using data-dependent scanning function for identification purpose. Non-targeted CID experiments using data-dependent scan were conducted at 27% Normalized Collision Energy (NCE) in positive and negative modes. CID experiments to confirm the presence of Pse (Leg) in metabolome were conducted at 22% NCE in positive and negative modes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TAP Purification and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TAP purification of all constructs has been described previously [8 (link), 9 (link)]. Eluates were directly analyzed on a Velos-Pro Orbitrap Elite hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Raw MS data were searched with SEQUEST (Thermo Fisher) or COMET [41 (link)], and protein false discovery rate was set at 2.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Separation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide samples were loaded onto a first-dimension trap column (Waters Xbridge, C18, 10 uM particle size, 100 Å pore size, 4 cm packing length 150 uM column inner diameter). Online peptide separation coupled to MS/MS was performed with a 2D-nanoLC system (nanoAcquity UPLC system, Waters) and a Velos-Pro/Orbitrap-Elite hybrid mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Six discrete elutions were performed at 1.5 uL/min with 5mM ammonium formate pH 10 using increasing concentrations of ACN (1%, 3%, 6%, 15%, 25% and 44%) and diluted with 6 uL/min 0.1% formic acid (FA) prior to loading onto a second dimension trap column (Dr. Maisch ReproSil-Pur, C18, 5 uM particle size, 120 Å pore size, 4 cm packing length 150 uM column inner diameter) connected to an analytical column (Orochem Reliasil, C18, 3 uM particle size, 90 Å pore size, 20–25 cm packing length 50 uM column inner diameter) with an incorporated electrospray emitter. Peptide separation was achieved using a gradient from 3 to 80% (V/V) of ACN in 0.1% FA over 115 minutes at a flow rate of 200 nL/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode using a Top 10 method. Full MS scans (m/z 300–2000) were acquired in the Orbitrap analyzer (resolution = 120,000), followed by high energy collision induced dissociation (HCD) MS/MS (fm/z 100–2000, resolution = 15,000) at a normalized collision energy of 35%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Proteomics of U251N Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the proteomes of the U251N shCTRL and shCAPN2 cells, 106 cells were collected and washed with DPBS. Proteins were extracted and desalted with S-Trap™ mini columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ProtiFi™). Proteins were digested with trypsin (V5111, Promega). Peptide concentrations were determined using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit. 25 µg of each sample were labelled with TMTpro™ 16plex Label Reagent Set (A44520, Thermo Scientific™) and pooled. 100 µg of the pooled sample were fractionated on a high pH liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent 1100 Series). 54 fractions were collected and concatenated to 18 samples which were submitted for LC–MS/MS analysis on a Velos Pro Orbitrap Elite™ (Thermo Scientific™) mass spectrometer coupled to an Easy nanoLC 1000 (Thermo Scientific™) with a 200 cm µPAC™ column (PharmaFluidics). Data were analyzed using MSFragger in Fragpipe 16.0 [51 (link)] and the UniProt human reference proteome database downloaded on the 14th of June 2021 (20,845 protein entries including 245 potential contaminants). We allowed for two missed cleavages, a fragment and a precursor mass tolerance of 20 ppm each. A mass shift of 304.207146 Da was set for the N-term and lysine (K) representing the tandem mass tags (TMT), a mass shift of 57.0214560 Da for cysteine (C) representing carbamidomethylations and of 40.010600 Da for N-term acetylation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

TAP Purification and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TAP purification of all constructs has been described previously [8 (link), 9 (link)]. Eluates were directly analyzed on a Velos-Pro Orbitrap Elite hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Raw MS data were searched with SEQUEST (Thermo Fisher) or COMET [41 (link)], and protein false discovery rate was set at 2.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!