The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microcon filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, Sweden

The Microcon filter is a laboratory filtration device designed to concentrate and purify small volume samples. It utilizes centrifugal force to pass solutions through a semi-permeable membrane, retaining the desired analytes while allowing smaller molecules to pass through. The core function of the Microcon filter is to facilitate sample preparation and purification for various analytical techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using microcon filter

1

Anaerobic Sample Preparation and EPR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation was carried out in a Coy anaerobic chamber under 90% Ar/10% H2. DT was removed from the solution by buffer exchanging MoFeP into 50 mM TRIS, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl using 10-DG desalting columns (BioRad). MoFeP was concentrated to 50 μM using 10-kDa cutoff Microcon filters (EMD/Millipore). Concentrated protein samples were either reduced with 10 mM DT or oxidized with 5 mM IDS. Mutants containing labile iron-centers also had a re-reduced sample prepared in which the IDS-oxidized protein was desalted over another 10-DG column, concentrated, then re-reduced with 10 mM DT. All data were collected on an X-band Bruker EMX spectrometer with a liquid helium cryostat at 5 – 10 K. Spectra were recorded with a modulation frequency of 100.0 kHz and modulation amplitude of 9.8 G. Perpendicular and parallel mode spectra were collected at microwave frequencies of ~9.62 GHz and ~9.39 GHz, and microwave power of 6 mW and 127 mW, respectively. All perpendicular-mode spectra shown in figures were background subtracted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Filter-Aided Tryptic Digestion for Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-solution tryptic digest of the samples was prepared using a filter-aided sample preparation method. A total of 100 μg of protein was exchanged into UA buffer (8 M urea, 100 mM Tris, pH - 8.0) to remove DTT and sodium deoxycholate using 30 kDa cut-off Microcon filters (Merck Millipore) for a couple of spins centrifuged at 14000 x g for 15 min. Alkylation was carried out in the filters using UA buffer with 50 mM chloroacetamide and incubated in the dark for 20 min. Post incubation, the filters were washed with UA buffer thrice followed by additional washes with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (AB buffer) twice. The proteins were then digested overnight at 37°C with trypsin (Sigma Aldrich) using AB buffer (1:50 enzyme: protein ratio). Peptides were collected by centrifugation and desalted on C18 stage tips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Peptide Preparation for Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were digested with the Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) procedure [107 (link)]. Sample protein concentration was assessed spectrophotometrically, and 100 μg of protein was placed on separate Microcon® filters with a 10 kDa cutoff membrane (Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Filters were washed twice with a urea buffer (8 M urea/100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5) by 20 min centrifugation at 10,000× g before alkylation of the cysteine residues by incubation with 55 mM iodoacetamide/urea buffer in the dark, for 20 min. Afterwards, the filters were washed multiple times with the urea buffer and a digestion buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5). Filters were then placed in new tubes filled with a trypsin solution (1:50 enzyme-to-substrate weight ratio) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. Resulting proteolytic peptides were eluted in additional digestion buffer washes and further cleaned up for mass spectrometry analysis with the Stage Tips procedure [108 (link)] on in-house-prepared C18 resin tips. In the last clean-up step, peptides were eluted with 100 μL of 1% acetic acid/60% acetonitrile/water. Before mass spectrometry analysis, the samples were condensed to 40 μL by using SpeedVac.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Stable Isotope Labeling of Melanoma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All melanoma cells were grown in a DMEM except for IPC‐298 which was grown in a RPMI medium, complemented with essential amino acids Arg and Lys, containing naturally occurring atoms (Sigma) (the light medium) or two of their stable‐isotope counterparts (the medium and heavy media) (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc.; CIL). The medium culture contained arginine (l‐Arg 13C614N4) and lysine (l‐Lys 13C615N2), and the heavy culture contained arginine (l‐Arg 13C615N4) and lysine (l‐Lys 13C615N2) amino acids. After five cell divisions to obtain full incorporation of the labeled amino acids into the proteome, cells were counted and equal numbers of cells were split to 15‐cm dishes at roughly 50% confluence. Once cell lines reached ~70% confluence, one 15‐cm dish of each cell line was washed 3 × with PBS and 3 × with serum‐free media. Cells were starved in serum‐free media for 18 h, and the conditioned media (CM) were centrifuged (800 g, 3 min), filtered (0.22 μm) to remove detached cells, and concentrated via centrifugation at 4,500 g in 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff concentrating columns. Then, 500 μl of concentrated medium was filtered by microcon filters with 10 kDa cutoff (Millipore) and buffer was exchanged with 8 M Urea 100 mM Tris or PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nasal Epithelium RNA Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After laser capture microdissection of the nasal cavity transitional cell epithelium RNA was extracted from the control and 120 mg/kg groups (according to the NTP protocol for laser capture microdissected samples (http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/protocols/extraction/picoscale/index.cfm)). The RNA was analyzed for quantity and purity by UV analysis using the NanoDrop ND-1000 (NanoDropTechnologies, Wilmington, DE). Samples were concentrated using Microcon filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA). All samples were evaluated for RNA integrity by gel electrophoresis using the Flash Gel RNA cassette system (Lonza, Rockland, ME).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis of Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleotide sequences of the resistance genes were determined using the DNA sequencing primers listed in Table 2 [26 (link),27 (link)]. PCR products were purified using Microcon filters (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA) and were sequenced using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Reaction v. 3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) on a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The complementary sense and antisense sequences were aligned using the SeqManII program within the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). The DNA sequences and deduced amino acid sequences were examined using the BLAST program at the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) [28 ], and the “β-Lactamase Classification and Amino Acid Sequences for TEM, SHV, and OXA Extended-Spectrum and Inhibitor Resistant Enzymes” website [29 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mouse Liver Protein Extraction and Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty milligrams of each mouse liver were washed with PBS, homogenized in 200 μL lysis buffer (4% SDS in 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.5) and centrifuged at 3000× g at 4 °C for 5 min. Total protein content was measured according to the BCA method [25 ]. A total protein amount of 100 μg for each sample was used for tryptic digestion according to the common FASP protocol [26 (link)]. Briefly, detergents in the samples were exchanged with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) using Microcon filters (10 kDa cut off, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Protein disulfide bridges were reduced with 100 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), alkylation of thiols was performed with 55 mM iodacetamide in 8 M urea/100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5). Tryptic digestion with a trypsin (Sequencing Grade Modified, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to protein ratio of 1:100 was carried out overnight at 37 °C in a 50 mM tetraethylammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.5) followed by an additional digestion step under the same conditions with 2 h duration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Ethanol Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethanol quantification was carried with the aid of the EnzyChrom® Ethanol Assay kit, according to the manufacturer’s specifications (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA). Briefly, 1-mL aliquots of Z. mobilis cultures (grown in MM medium) were collected at different timepoints, centrifuged at 8000× g for 1 min and the resulting supernatant was filtered through 0.22 µm Microcon® filters (Millipore, Burlington, VT, USA). Cells present in the centrifugation pellet were eluted in 1 × saline solution and used to quantify total protein present in the bacterial biomass with the aid of Bradford reagent, after treatment with 0.2 mM NaOH, for 30 min, according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Sigma-Aldrich/Merck). The filtered supernatant was submitted to serial dilution and 10 µL of each dilution was distributed into individual wells of a 96-well microplate, along with 90 µL of freshly prepared EnzyChrom® reaction mixture (provided in the kit). The contents were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min and reactions were interrupted by the addition of 100 µL of Stop Solution (provided in the kit). OD595 readings were performed in a Multiskan Go microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and ethanol content was determined by interpolating the results with a standard curve, made with samples containing pre-defined ethanol concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SILAC-based Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts from light and heavy N2a cells were obtained by homogenization in lysis buffer containing 8 M urea in 50 mM ABC (pH 8.2) supplemented with complete protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche), followed by sonication (three 10 s pulses with 30 s on ice between each pulse). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Lysates from light and heavy N2a cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and loaded onto 30-kDa molecular weight cutoff Microcon filters (Millipore; Billerica, MA, USA). Proteins were reduced by incubating samples with 20 mM DTT for 30 min at 37°C with agitation (245 rpm) and subsequently alkylated with 20 mM IAA for 30 min in darkness at room temperature. Protein digestion was performed by incubation with 40:1 (w/w, protein:enzyme) trypsin (Worthington Biochemical Corporation) overnight at 37°C with agitation (245 rpm). Samples were acidified using 10% (v/v) FA, then desalted using inhouse made C18 desalting cartridges (C18 beads: Dr. Maisch GmbH) and desiccated using a SpeedVac prior to being resuspended in 0.1% (v/v) FA for LC-MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Radiolabeled Human Serum Albumin Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anti‐Epac1 antibody was kindly provided by J. Bos, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands. The anti‐Epac2 antibody (5B1) was from Cell Signaling technology (www.cellsignal.com). The anti‐CD31 antibody (DIA‐310) was from Dianova, Hamburg, Germany. ANP and rolipram were from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Gadomer‐17 was from in vivo Contrast GmbH, Schering Pharma (Berlin, Germany). Human serum albumin (HSA) was labelled with 131I or 125I (from Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) by the iodogen method, as previously described (Curry et al. 2010). Any free iodide was removed by spinning twice on a 3‐kDa cut‐off column (Microcon filter; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) prior to experiments. The labelled HSA eluted like native HSA upon anionic exchange and high‐resolution size exclusion chromatography with online gamma radiation detection in series with UV detector. Low molecular weight radioactivity accounted for <0.3% of the total activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!