The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using rnf168

1

Antibody Characterization Protocol for DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used in this study included: UBR5 (#8755, CST®, 1:1000); anti-mouse-BrdU (Becton Dickinson, different dilutions); anti-rat-BrdU (ab6326, Abcam; 1:500); PCNA-PC10 (Cancer Research, UK, 1:1000); Vimentin (V6389, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:1000); RNF8 (ab15850, Abcam; 1:2000); RNF168 (#ABE367, Millipore; 1:500); Tubulin (clone B-5-1-2, Sigma-Aldrich); Anti-Flag M2 (F3165, Sigma-Aldrich); 53BP1 (NB100-305, Novusbio, 1:2000); Chk1-PhosphoS345 (#2341 CST®,1:1000); Chk1 (#2360 CST®,1:1000); Chk2-PhosphoT68 (#2661 CST®, 1:500); Chk2(#2662 CST®, 1:1000); TRIP12 (ab86220, Abcam; 1:500); Histone H2A(ab18255, Abcam; 1:1000); polη (custom made, raised against the peptide: VQVEQRQNPHLRNKPC, 1:1000); polη-PhosphoS601(Eurogentec,(15 (link))); Histone H2A.X-PhosphoS139 (Upstate), RPA2 (1:1000, Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibody-based Analysis of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used against FANCJ (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA), BARD1 (BL518; Bethyl Laboratories), BRCA1 (C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), KAP‐pS824 (Bethyl Laboratories), RAP80, (Bethyl Laboratories), RNF168 (ABE367; Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and RAD51 (BioAcademia, Osaka, Japan) were rabbit polyclonal antibodies. The antibodies against CtIP (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA), conjugated ubiquitin (FK2; Nippon Bio‐Test Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan), HP1α (Millipore), HP1β (1MOD‐1A9; Millipore), HP1γ (2MOD‐1G6; Millipore), H3K9me2 (CMA307; Millipore), γH2AX (JBW301; Millipore), and α‐ and β‐tubulin (DMIA+BMIB; Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA) were mouse mAbs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Characterization in Cell Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% Fetal Calf Serum (FCS), except B cells which were grown in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 15% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine and 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol. Parental cells were tested for mycoplasma contamination.
Mouse antibodies employed were against Flag M2, α- and β-Tubulin (Sigma), γH2AX (Millipore) 6×His (Clontech), GFP (Cell signaling) and ATM (Santa Cruz), rabbit antibodies were against TopBP1, RIF1, PTIP, 53BP1 and phosphoKAP1 (S824) (All Bethyl Laboratories), 53BP1 (Santa Cruz), RNF168 (Millipore), TIRR (Sigma), phospho53BP1 (T543), phospho53BP1 (S25/29), HMGA1, H3 (All Cell Signaling) and AID (generated by the Chaudhuri Lab) and rat antibody against RPA2 (Cell Signaling). The RIF1 antibody used in immunofluorescence is a kind gift of Lifeng Xu (University of California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell extract (WCE) was resolved by SDS-PAGE (NuPAGE, Invitrogen) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Samples were incubated with primary antibodies recognizing RNF168 (Millipore), 53BP1 (Novus Biologicals), phospho-RPA2 (S4, S8), phospho-CHK1 (S317; all from Bethyl Laboratories), RPA2 (Cell Signaling Technologies) and α-tubulin (Sigma–Aldrich). Following incubation with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare), bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For standard immunofluorescence studies, MEFs grown on coverslips were subjected to γ-irradiation (cesium-137) or treated with PARPi. At the indicated times post-treatment, cells were first pre-extracted (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.3 M sucrose, 0.2% Triton X-100) for 5 min on ice to remove nucleoplasmic proteins and then sequentially fixed (4% paraformaldehyde), permeabilized (0.5% Triton X-100) and blocked (2% BSA). Samples were incubated with primary antibodies recognizing HA-tag (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), RNF168 (Millipore), conjugated ubiquitin (FK2, Sigma–Aldrich), 53BP1 (Novus Biologicals), RIF1 (14 (link)), RPA2 (Cell Signaling Technologies), RAD51 (H-92; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) followed by appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). DNA was counterstained with DAPI. Foci images were captured with a fluorescence microscope at 63× magnification, unless otherwise stated. High-throughput automated imaging was used to captured chromatin-bound RPA at 20× magnification. Integrated nuclear RPA intensity was quantified using CellProfiler 2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear extracts were obtained using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific) and whole cell extracts were generated using RIPA buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors added. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in phosphate-buffered saline tween 20 (PBST) at room temperature for 1 h. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4° and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The following primary antibodies were used: BRCA1 (EMD Millipore, catalog# OP92), RNF168 (EMD Millipore, #06-1130-I), Tubulin (Cell Signaling, catalog# 2148), GFP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog# sc-9996), RFP (ChromoTek, catalog# 6g6-20), FLAG (Cell Signaling, catalog# 14793 and Sigma Aldrich, catalog# F1804), phospho-Chk1 (Cell Signaling, catalog# 2344), Chk1 (Cell Signaling, catalog# 2360), POLD3 (Bethyl Laboratories, A301-244A), PALB2 (Bethyl Laboratories, catalog# A301-246A), BRCA2 (Bethyl Laboratories, catalog# A303-435A), RAD51 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog# sc-8349), RAD18 (Bethyl Laboratories, catalog# A301-340A), 53BP1 (Cell Signaling, catalog# 4908).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence and Immunoblotting Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence and immunoblotting: RNF126 (mouse monoclonal antibody, Cat No. sc-376005, 1:500, Santa-Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA); FK2 (mouse monoclonal antibody, Cat No. 04-263, 1:250, EMD Millipore, Boston, MA); RNF8 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, Cat No. PABR-1160-042604, 1:500, Bethyl, Montgomery, TX); RNF168 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, Cat No. 06-1130, 1:1000, EMD Millipore); 53BP1 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, Cat No. A300-272A, 1:500, Bethyl); RAP80 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, Cat No. A300-763A, 1:250, Bethyl); γH2AX (mouse monoclonal antibody, Cat No. 05-636, 1:500, EMD Millipore); MDC1 [43] (link); HA (mouse monoclonal antibody, Cat No. M180-3, 1:5000, MBL, Nagoya, Japan); FLAG (mouse monoclonal antibody, Cat No. M185-3L, 1:5000, MBL); GFP (rabbit polyclonal antibody, Cat No. 598, 1:2000, MBL); β-actin (mouse monoclonal antibody, Cat No.66009-1-Ig, 1:5000, Proteintech, Chicago, IL). The following secondary antibodies were used: donkey anti-mouse IgG (Cat No.715-585-150, 1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Cat No. 711-585-152, 1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody Panel for DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used in this study were UBA80 (Raybiotech, 144-02027-50), UBA52 (Bio-Rad, VPA00424), Flag M2 (Sigma, F1804), Myc (Santa Cruz, sc-40), GFP (Invitrogen, A11122), 53BP1 (Novus Biologicals, NB100-304), BRCA1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-6954), γH2AX (Millipore, 05-636), H2AX (Cell Signaling, 2595S), H2A (Cell Signaling, 2578), tubulin (Abcam, ab6046), MDC1 (Abcam, ab11169), RNF168 (Sigma-Aldrich, ABE367), GST (Millipore, 71007-3), and MBP (Abcam, ab119994). For Western blotting, secondary antibodies—horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G and horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse immunoglobulin G—were purchased from Cell Signaling (0704 and 0706). For immunofluorescence, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse antibodies were used (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Irradiated Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After irradiation, lysates were obtained at various time points and sonicated (QSonica) for 2 minutes in 0.4 M NaCl/20 mM HEPES buffer containing 1% Igepal, 0.1 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 0.1 M phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma). Protein concentrations were measured with a DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Equalized proteins were subjected to electrophoresis at 60 mA in polyacrylamide pre-cast gels (Bio-Rad) and electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) at 4ºC for 1 hour at 100 V. Membranes were blocked with 5% milk (Bio-Rad). Antibodies were incubated overnight in 5% milk at various concentrations (P16, BD Bioscience, 1:5000; TRIP12, Santa Cruz, 1:1000; RNF168, Sigma, 1:1000; pRb, CST, 1:500; Rb, CST, 1:1000). Membranes were washed in Tris-buffered saline (Bio-Rad) with 0.1% Tween20 (Sigma) and incubated for 45 minutes at ambient temperature in 1:2000 anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (GE Healthcare). Immunoreactions were visualized with the ECL2 system (Thermo Scientific) and then immediately exposed to autoradiographic film (Denville) for various periods. Images were scanned with an HP Scanjet 5550c and quantified with ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!