The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using hema 3 stain kit

1

Tracheal Cannulation and Lung Lavage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tracheas were cannulated and lungs lavaged with 2.0 mL PBS (7.4 pH). Cells were collected by instilling 2.0 mL phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.2) and the lavage centrifuged onto slides (Cytospin). Slides were stained using Hema 3 stain kit (Fisher Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) [26] (link). A minimum of 300 cells were counted per animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell counts were performed immediately after BAL using a hemocytometer. For the differential cell counts, slides were prepared using a cytocentrifuge and stained with a Hema-3 Stain Kit (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and analyzed by light microscopy [21 ]. Total protein concentration was determined using the Micro BCA Protein Assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). For determination of total phospholipids, 100 μl of BAL supernatant were lyophilized and then assayed using the Phospholipids B Assay (WAKO Chemicals Inc, Richmond, VA). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured on 50 μL of each BAL sample using the CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega, Madison, WI) following the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Matrigel Invasion Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay was carried out using BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Scientific). In total, 5×105 cells were resuspended in serum-free M3 medium and grown in the Matrigel chamber. The Transwells contained cM3/FE/Ins medium as a chemoattractant. At 40 h post-incubation, the cells were stained using the HEMA 3 stain kit (Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Eosinophil Isolation and Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Granulocytes were isolated from peripheral blood of allergic or healthy donors. Eosinophils were enriched and purified by negative selection using the human eosinophil enrichment cocktail (SSep™, StemCell Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA) and the MACS bead procedure (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA), as previously described (23 (link)) with the exception that hypotonic red blood cell (RBC) lysis was omitted to avoid any potential for RBC lysis to affect eosinophil function. Eosinophil viability and purity were greater than 99% as determined by ethidium bromide (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) incorporation and cytocentrifuged smears stained with HEMA 3 stain kit (Fisher Scientific, Medford, MA, USA), respectively. Purified eosinophils (106 cells/mL) were stimulated with TNF-α (200 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or recombinant human CCL11 (100 ng/mL; R&D Systems), in RPMI-1640 medium plus 0.1% ovalbumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), or medium alone at 37°C, for 1 h. At these concentrations, CCL11 and TNF-α induce consistent cell secretion (16 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Eosinophil Isolation and Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Granulocytes were isolated from the blood of different healthy donors. Eosinophils were enriched and purified by negative selection using human eosinophil enrichment cocktail (StemSep™, StemCell Technologies, Seattle WA, USA) and the MACS bead procedure (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA), as described [57], with the exception that hypotonic red blood cell (RBC) lysis was omitted to avoid any potential for RBC lysis to affect eosinophil function. Eosinophil viability and purity were greater than 99% as determined by ethidium bromide (Molecular Probes, OR, USA) incorporation and cytocentrifuged smears stained with HEMA 3 stain kit (Fisher Scientific, TX, USA), respectively. Experiments were approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Committee on Clinical Investigation, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Purified eosinophils (106 cells/mL) were stimulated with TNF-α (200 ng/mL; R&D Systems, USA) or recombinant human CCL11 (eotaxin-1) (100 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in RPMI-1640 medium plus 0.1% ovalbumin (OVA) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), or medium alone at 37°C, for 1 h as before [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mouse Lung Lavage and Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lung of each mouse was lavaged with 3 × 0.5 ml of sterile saline according to previously described59 (link),60 (link). The BALF was centrifuged at 250 × g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended with 1 ml of sterile saline, and then the cells were mounted on a slide by cytospin centrifuge (Hettich ROTOFIX 32 A) at 1000 rpm for 3 min. Slides were air-dried and stained with Hema-3 Stain Kit (Fisher Scientific Company, Kalamazoo, MI) for analysis with Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U research microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Erythrocyte Isolation and DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected from individual fish by venipuncture of the caudal vein using a 21 gauge needle and tuberculin syringe. The needle was removed and blood gently expressed into a 400 μl heparinized Microtainer tube (Becton-Dickinson). Blood smears were prepared by spreading a drop of blood onto the surface of an RNAse free MMI membrane slide and support (Molecular Machines & Industries). Smears were allowed to air dry and stained using a Hema-3 stain kit (Fisherbrand). To prevent cross-contamination, smears were stained by individually flooding slide surfaces, each with fresh reagents, rather than by dipping them into a common staining jar. Slides were examined at 400 X using an Olympus IX71 microscope and erythrocytes excised using an MMI CellCut Plus laser microdissection and isolation cap system (Molecular Machines & Industries). Only widely separated erythrocytes were excised near the feather edge of the smear. Approximately 100–150 erythrocytes were collected per isolation tube. DNA was isolated from erythrocytes using DNeasy mini spin columns per manufactures instruction (Qiagen DNeasy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Epithelial Cell Bacterial Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the bacterial burden in an individual epithelial cell, we utilized an invasion index to represent the proportion of infected cells and how heavily each cell was colonized [40 (link),41 (link)].To calculate the invasion index in epithelial cells, tear fluid was collected from the ocular surface bacterial inoculation in the absence or presence of 10 nM of E64, for 6 h, the cells was sedimented by centrifugation at 4°C at 250xg for 10 min and washed three times with cold PBS followed by sedimentation. The final suspension was resuspended in 200 μl of PBS and the cells were mounted on slides by cytospin centrifugation. The slides were stained using the Hema-3 Stain Kit (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). With light microscopy, one hundred randomly selected epithelia per slide were analyzed at ×1,000 magnification. Bacteria at adherence and internalization steps were counted as invasion bacteria [35 (link)]. The invasion index was calculated and expressed as the ratio of invasion bacteria to total bacterium-laden epithelial cells. The percentage of epithelial cells invaded by S. aureus was also calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Eosinophil Functional Assays in Allergic Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Granulocytes were isolated from peripheral blood of allergic or healthy donors. Eosinophils were enriched and purified by negative selection as previously described (StemSepTM, StemCell Technologies, Seattle WA; Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA; Bandeira-Melo et al., 2000 (link); Akuthota et al., 2014 (link)). The hypotonic red blood cell (RBC) lysis was omitted to avoid any potential for RBC lysis to affect eosinophil function. Eosinophil viability and purity were >99% as determined by ethidium bromide (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) incorporation and cytocentrifuged smears stained with HEMA 3 stain kit (Fisher Scientific, Medford, MA), respectively. Purified eosinophils (106 cells/mL) were stimulated with TNF-α (200 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or recombinant human CCL11 (100 ng/mL; R&D Systems), in RPMI-1640 medium plus 0.1% ovalbumin (OVA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), or medium alone at 37°C, for 1 h as before (Carmo et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Alveolar Macrophage Particle Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To qualitatively evaluate in vivo uptake of each particle type by alveolar macrophages and approximate intracellular location, phase contrast imaging of fixed cells from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was conducted (n = 8) as previously described [17 (link)]. Briefly, a cannula was inserted into the esophagus of euthanized mice, attached to a sterile syringe, then followed by the addition 0.8 ml of ice cold phosphate-buffered saline to the entire lung. Mild compressions of the chest were performed as fluid was collected into the syringe. Lavage was performed 4 times and centrifuged to pellet collected cells. BAL cells were resuspended in saline and counted. Collected BAL cells were immobilized via Cytospin, fixed and stained with a HEMA3 stain kit (Fisher Scientific), and imaged with a Leica DM2500 equipped with an Olympus DP73 digital camera. Images were evaluated for intracellular and extracellular particulate and compared to both in vitro TEM images and in vivo stained histological sections of lung.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!