The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prime version 3

Manufactured by Schrödinger
Sourced in United States

Prime version 3.0 is a versatile and advanced lab equipment designed to perform a wide range of scientific tasks. It features a robust and reliable hardware configuration, along with a comprehensive software suite that enables users to carry out various experimental procedures with precision and efficiency.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using prime version 3

1

CRISP3 Structural Modeling and Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mouse CRISP3 homology model based on the crystal structure template of Natrin, a snake venom CRISP from Taiwan Cobra (pdb 1XTA), was generated using the prime module from the Schrodinger molecular modelling software suite with missing residues added (Prime version 3.0 Schrödinger, Inc, New York, NY 2010). The model was further refined and visualized with VMD software36 (link). A 50 nanosecond NAMD molecular dynamics simulation of the CRISP model was produced. Temperature was controlled using Langevin dynamics37 (link). The representative glycan groups modelled were complex (tetraantennary with terminal sialic acid residues) and high mannose (mannose-9) for human and mouse CRISP3, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MM-GBSA Binding Affinity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The best docked pose of ligands selected from previous QPLD calculations were subjected to a subsequent analysis with MM-GBSA process implemented in Prime software (Prime, version 3.0, Schrödinger LLC, New York, NY, 2011) (Brindisi et al., 2015 (link)). This method was employed to predict binding affinity and relative free-binding energy (ΔGbind) between ligands and HIV-1 IN with further accuracy. The MM-GBSA approach combines MM energies with a continuum solvent generalized Born (GB) model for polar solvation and with a solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) for non-polar solvation term. In this way, the best ligand poses were subjected to energy minimization by local optimization feature in the Prime. During this process, the ligand strain energy was also considered. Ligand binding energies were calculated using the OPLS-2005 force field and generalized-Born/surface area continuum solvent model as previously reported by us (Brindisi et al., 2015 (link), 2016 (link); Maquiaveli et al., 2016 (link); Brogi et al., 2017a (link); Vallone et al., 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Binding Energy Calculation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected docked compounds were subjected to re-scoring through the Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA) method implemented in Prime, version 3.0 (Schrödinger, L.L.C., New York, NY, USA) [74 (link),75 (link),76 ] as per published protocol [68 (link)]. The relative free energy of binding (ΔG, kcal/mol) was calculated for each molecule as an average of five independent runs of the Prime MM-GBSA protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Computational Protein-Ligand Binding Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The free energy of binding was calculated for both docked complexes with D-sorbitol using the Prime/MM-GBSA method as described previously34 . It was performed using the OPLS-2005 force field and GBSA continuum model in Prime version 3.0 (Schrodinger) as described previously50 (link)51 (link).
The binding free energy, ΔGbind, was obtained using the following equations as described previously52 (link):


where Eligand, Eprotein, and Ecomplex are the minimized energies of the inhibitor, protein, and protein-inhibitor complex, respectively.

where Gsolv (ligand), Gsolv (protein), and Gsolv (complex) are the solvation free energies of the inhibitor, protein, and complex, respectively.

where GSA (ligand), GSA (protein), and GSA (complex) are the surface area energies for the ligand, protein, and complex, respectively53 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Induced Fit Docking Protocol for Ligand-Receptor Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Induced Fit Docking protocol is composed of job sequence in which ligands are docked with Glide (first step), then Prime Refinement is used to allow the receptor to relax (second step), and the ligands are redocked into the relaxed receptor with Glide (third step).
Binding site for the first Glide docking phase (Glide Standard Precision Mode) of the Induced Fit Workflow (Induced Fit Docking, protocol 2015–2, Glide version 6.4, Prime version 3.7, Schrödinger)38 –40 (link) is calculated on the 2CG9 structure37 (link), mapping onto a grid with dimensions of 36 Å (outer box) and 20 Å (inner box), centered on residues 628–630, 640–641, 670–675 (Hsp90 residues numbering as in the PDB entry 2CG9). Maestro’s default protocol was used for the first (Initial Glide docking) and the second step (Prime Induced Fit) considering 20 poses per ligand; these poses were retained from the initial docking and then were passed to Prime (Prime version 3.7, Schrödinger 2015), for the Prime refinement step. Finally, the ligands were re-docked (third step) into their corresponding low energy protein structures (Glide Extra Precision Mode) with resulting complexes ranked according to GlideScore.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Modeling of NRF2-MAFG Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The x-ray structure of v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog G (MafG) homodimer complexed to DNA (5′-CTGATGAGTCAGCAC-3′, [PDB ID: 3A5T]) determined to 2.8 Å resolution (28 (link)) was used as a template to model the NRF2-MAFG-DNA (5′-CAGTGACTCAGCAG-3′), MAFG-NRF2-DNA (5′-CAGTGACTCAGCAG-3′), MAFG-MAFG-DNA (5′-CAGTGACTCAGCAG-3′) and NRF2-NRF2-DNA (5′-CAGTGACTCAGCAG-3′) complexes. In the modeling, the TGATGAGTCAGCAC sequence of the template was replaced with the target sequence CAGTGACTCAGCAG. In the case of base substitution, the Leap programme of the AMBER package ( AMBER 14 (29 ), University of California, San Francisco) was used to build the coordinates of the new base by using the common atoms of the two bases. Thus, only the coordinates of the atoms not shared by the two bases were built. The NRF2 of the models was built using corresponding MAF monomer of the x-ray structure as a template and the Prime module of Schrödinger suite (Schrödinger Release 2014–3: Maestro, version 9.9.013; Prime, version 3.7, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2014).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Modeling Linezolid Binding in D50S

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The derivatives were modelled into the crystal structure of native Deinococcus radiodurans large ribosomal subunit (D50S) bound with linezolid (Pdb: 3DLL55 (link)) using Schrödinger software package and its Induced Fit Docking module (Induced Fit Docking protocol 2013-2, Glide version 5.9, Prime version 3.2, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2013), to account for the reported structural flexibility of the peptidyl transferase centre.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Computational Analysis of SQ109 Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 2D structures of the compounds SQ109(1a), 1b-i, 2 were sketched with Marvin Program (Marvin version 21.17.0, ChemAxon, https://www.chemaxon.com), model-built with Schrödinger 2017–1 platform (Schrödinger Release 2021–1: Protein Preparation Wizard; Epik, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021; Impact, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY; Prime, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021) and the compounds' 3D structures in their monoprotonated form were energy minimized using the conjugate gradient method, the MMFF94 [71 (link)] force field and a distance-dependent dielectric constant of 4.0 until a convergence threshold of 2.4 10–5 kcal mol−1 Å−1 was reached. The ionization state of the compounds at pH 7.5 were checked using the Epik program [72 (link)] implemented in Schrödinger suite (Prime Version 3.2, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2015). Τhe most likely state for the ethylenediamine unit is the mono- protonated but we also performed all the calculations for the diprotonated state as well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural Analysis of AtTPC1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This work is based on the crystal structure of AtTPC1 (PDB ID 5e1j). The structure was prepared using the PRIME module of the Schrodinger suite of programs (Prime, version 3.9, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2017).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Homology Modeling and Docking of h12/15-LOX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A homology model of human reticulocyte 12/15-lipoxygenase protein (Uniprot ID P16050) was built using the software PRIME Version 3.9 (Schrodinger Inc)29 from the rabbit reticulocyte 15-Lipoxygenase-1 crystal structure (PDB ID 2p0m, chain B). The two LOX isozymes have 90% similarity and 81% identity between the two. Both the co-crystallized ligand and the metal ion were retained during the homology modeling. After the model was built, it was subjected to a protein preparation step using Protein Preparation Wizard (Schrodinger Inc). During this step hydrogen atoms were added, proper bond-orders and atom-types were set and the protein structure was minimized such that heavy-atoms were not allowed to move beyond 0.3Å. Iron was treated as ferric ion (Fe3+). The inhibitor, 99089, structure was built using Maestro’s Edit/Build panel. We minimized the structure using LigPrep software (Schrodinger Inc), and enumerated plausible protonation states of the inhibitor by applying the empirical pKa prediction software Epik (Schrodinger Inc). We docked the inhibitor to h12/15-LOX active site using Glide software with the standard-precision docking scoring function (Schrodinger Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!