The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1.5t achieva scanner

Manufactured by Philips

The 1.5T Achieva scanner is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed and manufactured by Philips. It operates at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 Tesla, which is a commonly used field strength for clinical MRI scans. The core function of the 1.5T Achieva scanner is to acquire high-quality medical images of the human body for diagnostic and research purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 1.5t achieva scanner

1

Pediatric Brain MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All children had the brain MRI done at the Radiology Department of the Arkansas Children’s Hospital on a 1.5T Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with 60-cm bore size, 33-mT/m gradient amplitude, and 100-mT/m/ms maximum slew rate. The built-in body coil was used as a transmitter, and a standard 8-channel sensitivity encoding head coil was used as a receiver. Structural imaging data of the brain was acquired using a T1-weighted 3D turbo field echo pulse sequence with the following parameters: 7.3 ms TR; 3.4 ms TE; 8° flip angle; 1x1x1 mm acquisition voxel size; 256x232x150 matrix size; 2 averages; and 7 minutes of scan time. All Images were reviewed on the scanner at the time of scanning to screen for motion artifact, and scans with substantial motion artifacts were repeated. Those who were unable to hold still or did not wish to repeat were excluded from the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR was performed using a 1.5 T Achieva scanner equipped with a five-channel
cardiac phased array receiver coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands).
The CMR protocol included standard steady-state free-precession cine CMR in
short axis with retrospective ECG triggering and acquisition of 25 phases for LV
and RV volumetry and LV mass assessment. Native T1 mapping was performed using a
5s (3s) 3s modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence three
short-axes slices (apical, mid and basal) before and 15 minutes after contrast
media administration.13 For T2 mapping we used a gradient (echo planar imaging) and spin-echo
multi-echo sequence in three short-axis sections corresponding to the MOLLI sections.14 (link) Ten minutes after a bolus injection of 0.2 mmol/kg gadoter acid (Dotarem;
Guerbet, Sulzbach, Germany) at a rate of 2.5 ml/s end-diastolic LGE images were
acquired using end-diastolic phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences in
short-axis orientation covering the entire heart and in two, three and
four-chamber views. More details on the magnetic resonance imaging sequences,
acquisition parameters and extracellular volume (ECV) calculation are provided
in Supplementary Appendix E1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Right Ventricular Hemodynamics Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMRI was performed using a 1.5‐T Achieva scanner (Philips Medical Systems) with a five‐channel coil and master gradients (maximum gradient amplitude, 33 mT/m; maximum slew rate, 100 mT/m/ms). Furthermore, CMRI was performed within 14 days from the date of right heart catheterization, during which there were no significant changes in either hemodynamic status or PH treatment. Image acquisition and analysis were performed using a previously described protocol, with high intra‐ and interobserver reproducibilities.15 Briefly, 12 axial slices were acquired using a steady‐state free‐precession pulse sequence (repetition time, 2.8 ms; echo time, 1.4 ms; flip angle, 60; acquisition matrix, 192 × 256; field of view, 380 ms; slice thickness, 10 mm; 0 mm inter‐slice gap; and 20 phases/cardiac cycle). Images were analyzed using commercially available analysis software (Extended MR Work Space ver. 2.6.3; Philips Medical Systems). In the axial datasets, the endocardial contours of the right ventricle were manually traced, and the RV and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (EDV) and end‐systolic volume (ESV) were computed. RV and left ventricular stroke volume (SV) and EF were calculated as SV = EDV − ESV and EF = SV/EDV × 100%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating 3D-LOC CS Motion Correction in Phantom Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A phantom study was performed to assess the performance of 3D-LOC CS
with respect to motion correction and estimation of unmeasured k-space lines.
Using a Philips 1.5T Achieva scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The
Netherlands), a high-resolution phantom was imaged using the 3D-LOC CS sequence
with the following imaging parameters: field of view 300 (SI) × 300 (RL)
× 100 (AP) mm, voxel size 1.5 mm3 reconstructed to 0.65
× 0.65 × 0.75 mm3, flip angle 70°, echo time
1.9 ms, repetition time 3.8 ms, bandwidth 1.0 kHz, CS reduction factor of 3, and
a 32-element receiver coil array. The scan was paused once in the middle of the
acquisition to displace the phantom along the superior-inferior direction by 11
mm without moving the receiver coil arrays. For a reference image, the standard
3D-SSFP sequence with the same imaging parameters was used to acquire a fully
sampled image of the static phantom.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Resting-state BOLD Acquisition in Pediatric Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resting-state BOLD was acquired on a Philips 1.5T Achieva scanner. Scan parameters were: TR = 3000 ms, TE = 50 ms, FOV = 21.1 cm X 21.1 cm, imaging matrix = 80 X 80, slice thickness = 4 mm, 30 slices acquired covering the whole brain, SENSE factor = 2, 100 volumes acquired for a total scan time of 5 minutes per run. Two scan runs were acquired: one with the child asked to keep his eyes open, and one with eyes closed. There was a brief time gap (approximately 15 seconds) between runs to allow the examiner to provide instructions to study participants to close their eyes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cardiac MRI Evaluation of Runners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Runners and controls underwent CMR imaging with a 1.5-T Achieva Scanner (Philips Healthcare), using a 5-element cardiac coil and ECG gating. Conventional balanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine imaging in the short axis covering the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) was obtained for volumetry and LV mass. A Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery (MOLLI) sequence with a 5 s(3 s)3 s scheme on 3 short-axis slices (apical, mid, and basal) before and 15 min after administration of contrast medium was used to perform T1 mapping and ECV quantification. Additionally, after 10 min of a bolus injection of 0.2 mmol/kg gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem, Guerbet), end-diastolic LGE images were acquired with standard phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) sequences in short axis orientation and in 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views matching cine images. Details about the scanning protocol were previously reported [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phantom Evaluation of Heart-NAV MRA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A phantom study was undertaken to assess the performance of Heart-NAV with respect to prospective motion estimation and correction of k-space lines. Using a Philips 1.5T Achieva scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) and a 32-element receiver coil array, a high-resolution phantom was imaged with the non-contrast Heart-NAV whole-heart 3D SSFP MRA sequence with the following parameters: field of view 386 (SI) × 150 (AP) × 220 (RL) mm, voxel size 1.5 mm3, flip angle 90°, echo time 2.4 ms, repetition time 4.7 ms, sensitivity encoding (SENSE) factor 2, NAV acceptance window 100 mm, and tracking factor 1. The same sequence was repeated but paused twice to displace the phantom along the superior-inferior direction by 20 mm and 10 mm, while the Heart-NAV data was used to prospectively estimate and correct the motion. Finally, to create a reference image, a static phantom was imaged using the non-contrast diaphragm-NAV whole-heart MRA sequence with the same imaging parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pediatric Brain MRI Structural Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All children had a brain MRI examination done at the Radiology Department of the Arkansas Children's Hospital on a 1.5 T Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with 60-cm bore size, 33-mT/m gradient amplitude, and 100-mT/m/ms maximum slew rate. The built-in body coil was used as a transmitter, and a standard 8-channel sensitivity encoding head coil was used as a receiver. The imaging protocol included a T1-weighted 3D turbo field echo pulse sequence for structural imaging with the following parameters: 7.3 ms TR; 3.4 ms TE; 8° flip angle; 1 × 1x1 mm acquisition voxel size; 256 × 232x150 matrix size; 2 averages; and 7 min of scan time. All T1 Images were reviewed on the scanner at the time of scanning, and scans with substantial motion artifacts were repeated. Children unable to complete the scan with valid data were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!