The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pcpunc 15 probe

Manufactured by Hu-Friedy
Sourced in United States

The PCPUNC 15 probe is a dental instrument designed for periodontal examination. It features a slim, curved tip and a graduated scale to measure pocket depths and assess gingival health.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using pcpunc 15 probe

1

Full-Mouth Dental Indices Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full‐mouth plaque index (FMPI), full‐mouth bleeding on probing (FMBS), gingival index (GI) and probing depth to the nearest millimeter were recorded using a PCP‐UNC 15 probe (Hu‐Friedy). 3rd molars were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Periodontal and Implant Examination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Periodontal and implant examinations were performed at the final re-evaluation. Demographic data, medical history, and smoking status data were recorded. Regarding smoking, patients were divided into 3 groups: the nonsmokers (who had never smoked), former smokers (who quit > 5 years ago), and current smokers (who had at least one cigarette/day). At the re-evaluation, the periodontal status of patients was classified according to the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions [14 (link)]. Clinical examination was performed by two calibrated examiners (IP and PV). The full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), PPD, CAL, gingival recession (REC), and BOP around teeth were recorded. The PiPD, clinical attachment level (CALi), mucosa recession (RECi), implant plaque score (IPS), BOPi, and suppuration around implants were recorded. All measurements were performed manually at six aspects of each tooth and implant using a PCPUNC 15 probe (HuFriedy, Chicago, IL, USA). For CALi, the implant platform/shoulder was considered the cervical limit [21 (link), 31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Clinical Parameters Assessment for Periodontal Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical parameters, including probing depth (PD), gingival recession, CAL, plaque index (PI) [32 (link)] and gingival index (GI) [33 (link)] were recorded. The gingival recession and PD were measured using a PCP-UNC15 probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) from a reference point, the cementum-enamel junction, and both data were then combined and reported as CAL. All parameters were examined by one experienced periodontist (S.K.). The intra-examiner calibration was performed with 98% and 96% agreement for PD and CAL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Periodontal Status and Incisor Deflection Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Periodontal status was assessed with PPD and CAL measured at 6 sites/tooth (PCP-UNC15 probe, Hu-Friedy, Frankfurt, Germany). Except for one patient, all periodontal status at BL were assessed and documented (ParoStatus®, ParoStatus.de, Berlin, Germany) by one of two calibrated examiners. At T2, patients were followed up by an examiner who was blinded to the group affiliation. Measured against a reference model, the relative agreement of all examiners (measurement accuracy of ± 1 mm) was 89.3–96.0% for the CAL and 94.6–99.3% for the PPD.
The horizontal deflection of the mandibular incisors was measured in millimeters using a new method as described previously [3 (link)]. All measurements were performed by the same examiner and then converted to a modified Lindhe and Nyman degree classification [7 (link)] (degree I: pathological mobility ≤ 1 mm in labio-oral direction, degree II: mobility of > 1–2 mm, degree III: exceeding 2 mm in labial-oral direction and/or in vertical direction).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Implant Survival and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary clinical outcomes were implant survival and prosthetic complications. Secondary clinical outcomes were:

Marginal bone loss (MBL), evaluated at both the mesial and distal aspects of the implants immediately after surgery (T0) and at 6 (T6) months after surgery. MBL was evaluated on intraoral apical X-rays by measuring the distance between the implant-abutment interface and the most coronal aspect of the bone (Figure 5) using Imagej software. The known length of the implant was used to set the mm scale. The difference between T6 and T0 resulted in the MBL.

Peri-implant soft tissue parameters, including peri-implant probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and bleeding index (BI). PPD was evaluated using a HuFriedy PCPUNC 15 probe (HuFriedy, Chicago, IL, USA) at the mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, lingual, and disto-lingual aspect of each implant. PI and BI were evaluated as number of surfaces (the mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, lingual, and disto-lingual) presenting plaque or bleeding on probing. All the parameters were evaluated at T6.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!