The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

88 protocols using trim galore

1

RNA-seq Data Processing Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adapter-sequences of FastQ format RNA-seq reads were removed and the reads were trimmed of low quality ends (phred score = 20) by the use of Trim Galore! (version 0.4.2) (“Babraham Bioinformatics - Trim Galore!” 2017). The reads were aligned to the hg38 reference genome (Genbank: GCA_000001405.15) by using grape-nf (version 433e7621f6) (18 ), which combines STAR (version 2.4.0j) (19 (link)) for the alignment and RSEM (version 1.2.21) (20 (link)) for the read assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Illumina Paired-End Sequencing Data Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Illumina paired end sequencing data were exported in FASTQ file format. The reads were trimmed using Trim Galore (Babraham Bioinformatics, https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/, accessed on 19 November 2019) and cutadapt [64 (link)] to remove bases where the PHRED quality value was less than 20. Potential 3’ adapter and poly(A)-tail fragments were also removed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptomic Analysis of Redox, Stress, and Physiological Processes in Atlantic Salmon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The read quality checks, alignment, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were conducted as described by Yin et al. [25 (link)]. In brief, raw RNA-seq reads were trimmed and cleaned by TrimGalore! (Babraham Bioinformatics—Trim Galore!, version 0.6.5) and aligned to the reference genome of Atlantic salmon (ICSASG_v2; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_000233375.1, accessed on 19 August 2022) by STAR [40 (link)] and quantified by featureCount [41 (link)]. The mRNA expression of genes chosen based on their importance within the redox system [21 (link),22 (link),23 (link),25 (link),42 (link)], oxidative stress response [43 (link),44 (link),45 (link)], and physiological processes including the GH–insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis signaling [46 (link),47 (link)], and cell cycle regulation [18 (link),19 (link)] was studied in the liver, muscle, and brain (Supplementary Data S1). DEGs was defined by 10 pair-wise comparisons: (i) Apr vs. Mar, (ii) Jun vs. Mar, (iii) Aug vs. Mar, (iv) Sep vs. Mar, (v) Jun vs. Apr, (vi) Aug vs. Apr, (vii) Sep vs. Apr, (viii) Aug vs. June, (ix) Sep vs. Jun, and (x) Sep vs. Aug, by using the DESeq2 [48 ]. Genes were identified as DEGs when the adjusted p values were less than 0.05, and the absolute log fold changes (LFCs) were less than 1.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequenced 2 × 100 bp paired-end libraries were assessed for sufficient sequencing quality and potential adapter contamination using the programs FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, FastQC/">https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/FastQC/), trim_galore (version 0.6.5; Babraham Bioinformatics, trim_galore/">https://www.bioinformatics.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/) and cutadapt70 (link). Quality-controlled libraries have been mapped against the mouse reference genome (assembly GRCm38) using the bisulfite short read mapping software BSMAP71 (link). Only uniquely, properly paired reads (methratio.py parameters: --unique, --paired, --remove-duplicate) were used to detect CpG methylation levels and coverage. CpG motifs with a minimum coverage of five mapped reads in at least two replicates of one condition served as input for methylation level smoothing and detection of DMRs using the Bioconductor package bsseq (version 1.16)72 (link). Regions were classified as differentially methylated between two condictions if they (1) contain at least three CpG motifs with (2) a maximal distance of 300 bases, (3) a mean methylation difference of at least 0.25, and (4) all CpGs in the region have an associated t-statistic (bsseq function Bsmooth.tstat) beyond a [low,high] cutoff with low = 0.01 and high = 0.99 (parameter q = (low,high) of bsseq function dmrFinder).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Robust RRBS Protocol for Methylome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw sequence reads were evaluated and processed using software and methods as outlined previously [82]. Briefly, the reads were first assessed for quality using FastQC (version 0.11.5, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK), and then low-quality reads were trimmed off using Trim Galore (version 0.4.2, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK). Only the bases with a Phred > 30 were kept for downstream analysis and Illumina adaptors were also removed. A special setting designed for trimming RRBS data (–rrbs) in Trim Galore was also used. Specifically, Trim Galore trimmed the first two bases from the 3′ end of the reads so the cytosine (C) base closest to the second enzyme-cut site was not included in methylation calling, since the RRBS approach introduces artificial CpG sites at the end. Trimmed reads were then aligned and mapped with Bismark version 0.16.3 [83]/Bowtie2 version 2.2.9 [84] to an in silico bisulfite converted human reference genome (GRCh38). The unique alignment was then identified and used to make a methylation call after discarding reads with multiple mapping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

De-novo Transcriptome Assembly Using Trinity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fastq files were trimmed using Trimgalore! (Babraham Bioinformatics) with default parameters. Files were concatenated together into two fastq.gz files (one for each read -R1, and R2), which was then used to assemble transcripts fully de-novo (i.e. not genome-guided) using Trinity (Haas et al., 2013; (link)Grabherr et al., 2011) (link). Default parameters were used for Trinity with the exception of -SS lib type RF as all samples were sequenced as fr-second strand paired end.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genome Comparison for Assembly-Free Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To mitigate problems arising from incompleteness and errors in de novo assembly of short sequence reads, we used a genome-comparison strategy based on aligning sequencing reads against a highquality reference genome sequence. For this assembly-free genomic comparison, we acquired shortread whole-genome Illumina sequence data as FastQ files (Cock et al. 2010) for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense from the SRA database (Kodama et al. 2012 ). The quality of the sequencing data was evaluated using FASTQC (Andrews n.d.) . Reads with low quality or containing adaptor sequences were trimmed using Trim Galore (Babraham Bioinformatics -Trim Galore! 2022) or Canu (Koren et al. 2017) as appropriate to the sequencing method that generated the data. The sequences were aligned against the reference genome of isolate UK0001 (GenBank:GCA_007994515) using the Burrows Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (Li and Durbin 2010, 2009) and Minimap2 (Li 2018) . The alignments were evaluated with Qualimap (García-Alcalde et al. 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome Comparison for Assembly-Free Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To mitigate problems arising from incompleteness and errors in de novo assembly of short sequence reads, we used a genome-comparison strategy based on aligning sequencing reads against a highquality reference genome sequence. For this assembly-free genomic comparison, we acquired shortread whole-genome Illumina sequence data as FastQ files (Cock et al. 2010) for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense from the SRA database (Kodama et al. 2012 ). The quality of the sequencing data was evaluated using FASTQC (Andrews n.d.) . Reads with low quality or containing adaptor sequences were trimmed using Trim Galore (Babraham Bioinformatics -Trim Galore! 2022) or Canu (Koren et al. 2017) as appropriate to the sequencing method that generated the data. The sequences were aligned against the reference genome of isolate UK0001 (GenBank:GCA_007994515) using the Burrows Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (Li and Durbin 2010, 2009) and Minimap2 (Li 2018) . The alignments were evaluated with Qualimap (García-Alcalde et al. 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA-seq Data Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all RNA-seq experiments, raw reads were processed with Trim Galore!
(version 0.4.1) (Babraham Bioinformatics; https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore)
to remove adapter sequences and aligned with STAR (version 2.4.2)48 (link) to the human genome (GRCh38,
primary assembly) using the GENCODE annotation (version 23). Differential
expression analysis was performed in R (version 3.2.1) (http://www.R-project.org/) using the DESeq2
package (version 1.10.0)49 (link).
Gene set enrichment analysis was performed with GSEA2 (version 2.2.0)
and gene sets from MSigDB (version 5.0)50 (link),51 (link). We used the
“preranked” algorithm to analyze gene lists ranked by the negative
decadic logarithm of adjusted p-values obtained from the differential-expression
analysis with DESeq2. To separate up- and down-regulated genes, we artificially
assigned a negative sign to values for downregulated genes (thus using the
decadic logarithm of adjusted p-values). We used the options –nperm 1000,
-set_max 1500, and –set_min 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bovine Genome Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quality of the sequencing reads was evaluated using the software FastQC (v0.11.7, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK). Adaptor removal and trimming was performed when needed using the software Trim Galore (v0.4.4, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK). After quality control and processing, the resulting paired-end sequencing reads were aligned to ARS-UCD1.2 bovine reference genome using the software Bismark (v0.17.0, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK) [42 (link)]. The tool deduplicate_Bismark was used to remove duplicate read alignments. Methylation calls were performed using Bismark methylation extractor (v0.17.0, Babraham Bioinformatics) using the following parameters: --paired-end, −-comprehensive, −-bedGraph, and --cytosine_report [42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!