The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gc grade

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany

GC-grade is a type of laboratory equipment designed for gas chromatography (GC) applications. It is intended to provide a reliable and consistent performance in GC analysis. The core function of GC-grade equipment is to facilitate the separation, identification, and quantification of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in complex mixtures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using gc grade

1

Volatile Profiling of Host Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Headspace volatiles targeting the vegetative parts were collected from four of the identified host plants fed on by sand flies (~70% of samples analyzed) based on plant DNA detection namely, V. tortilis, S. laeta, V. nilotica and P. juliflora (see results section). This was carried out in situ in their natural habitats at the study site, using portable field pumps (Analytical Research System, Gainesville, Florida, USA). Odors from the four plants were collected by enclosing a vegetative part in an airtight oven bag (Reynolds, Richmond, VA, USA) (S1 Fig) by passing charcoal-filtered air at a flow rate of 350 ml/min on to two Super-Q adsorbents (30 mg, Analytical Research System, Gainesville, Florida, USA) for each replicate substrate. For all the plant species, volatiles were collected for 12 hr (06:00–18:00) during the day and 12 hr (18:00–06:00) at night and replicated three to four times for each plant species using a different plant. The same procedure was applied for the control, comprising volatiles from blank oven bags in the same habitat of the target plant. The Super-Q traps were each eluted with dichloromethane (DCM) (200 μl) (GC-grade, Sigma Aldrich, Gilling-ham, UK) and analyzed using coupled gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolite Extraction and Derivatization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Then samples were lysed using a Precellys bead-mill with 3 cycles at − 10 °C, 6500 rpm for 15 s and 10 s breaks in between runs. The mix was centrifuged (20,000×g, 4 °C, 15 min) and its supernatant subsequently dried in a vacuum centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Dried samples were derivatised with 20 µL methoxyamine (20 mg/mL in Pyridine) at 28 °C for 90 min under constant shaking. Afterwards, samples were derivatized with MSTFA (N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide; 37 °C, 30 min) and directly analyzed afterwards. QC samples were prepared by collecting and pooling 5 µL from each sample. The mixture was vortexed and aliquoted. A mixture of n-alkane mix (C10–C40, even; Neochema, Bodenheim, Germany) in hexane (GC-grade, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was used for retention index calculation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transesterification of Lipid Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transesterification, the dried isolates were incubated for 16 h in 1 N methanolic boron trifluoride (MeOH/BF3; Fluka) at 70°C. Saturated NaCl was added to stop the transesterification reaction and to advance the following phase separation. Dotriacontan (C32 alkane, 10.025 mg / 50 ml) was added as internal standard to each sample. The soluble hydrophobic components were extracted by adding chloroform. The chloroform phase was transferred to a new vial and extraction was repeated three times. The extract was dried with water free Na2SO4 and the volume was reduced to 50 μl by evaporation under N2 flow.
Samples were derivatized in 20 μl BSTFA (N,N-bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoracetamide; Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and 20 μl dry pyridine (GC-grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 40 min at 70°C. Pyridine catalyzed the derivatization reaction and BSTFA masked free hydroxyl- and carboxylgroups forming the corresponding trimethylsilyl derivatives [20 (link)]. Samples were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC; Type: 6890N, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) and mass spectroscopy (MS; Type: 5973N, Agilent Technologies). The GC and MS analysis was performed as described in detail previously [21 (link)]. The quantification of the monomers was performed using a gas chromatograph combined with a flame ionization detector. Four replicates of each plant species were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cuticular Wax Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cuticular wax composition of the stems of 6-week-old plants was determined according to Hauke and Schreiber (1998 (link)) with the slight modifications described by Lü et al. (2009 (link)). Cuticular wax was extracted using chloroform, and 10 μg of tetracosane (C24 alkane, 10 mg/50 mL) was added as an internal standard. The wax extracts were derivatized in 20 μL of N,N-bis(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA; Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and 20 μL of dry pyridine (GC-grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 40 min at 70°C. Quantitative analysis was performed using gas chromatography and flame ionization detection (Type: 6890N, Agilent Technologies, USA). Qualitative wax analysis was performed using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (Type: 5973N, Agilent Technologies, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determination of SVOCs in KH Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used for SVOC determination on the KH sample based on modifications to the U.S. E.P.A. 8270 protocol [32 (link)]. The KH samples were extracted with 99.8% dichloromethane (GC grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) before concentrating on the minimum injection volume. The sample was injected into the splitless inlet of an Agilent 7890B, 5977B MSD GC-MS system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The carrier gas, helium, flowed at a 1.0 mL/min rate. The peaks collected were compared with those in the NIST collection to identify the SVOCs (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Table 2 lists the GC and MS running circumstances.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SVOC Analysis of Gasoline Hydrocarbons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GH was analyzed for SVOCs using GC/MS based on the U.S. E.P.A. 8270 method [44 ] with modifications [45 (link)]. The GH samples were extracted with 99.8% dichloromethane (GC grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) before concentrating to the minimum injection volume. The sample was injected into the split-less inlet of an Agilent 7890B, 5977B MSD GC-MS system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Hydrogen served as the carrier gas and flowed at a rate of 1.0 mL/min. The SVOCs were identified by a comparison of the peaks obtained with those in the NIST library (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The running conditions for GC and MS are indicated in Table 9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!