The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

G box scanner

Manufactured by Syngene
Sourced in United States

The G:BOX scanner is a versatile imaging system designed for a range of laboratory applications. It captures high-quality images of gels, blots, and other samples using a sensitive CCD camera and a choice of illumination sources. The G:BOX scanner provides a reliable and efficient solution for visualization and analysis in research and diagnostic settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using g box scanner

1

Genotyping of Mutant Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping was performed from tail or ear clippings using a REDExtract-N-AmpTM tissue PCR kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the MMRRC protocol. The reverse primer (GGAATTAAGCCCTGGTGGACCTAAC) and forward primers (TATCCACTCTCCAAGAACCATCTGG and GGGCCAGCTCATTCCTCCCACTCAT) were used to amplify a 506 bp and 358 bp segment of the wild type and Neo resistance cassette of the mutant mouse, respectively. Products were separated on 0.9% UltraPureTM Agarose gel (Invitrogen, USA) and bands were read on G:BOX scanner (Syngene, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Arp2/3 complex crosslinking dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human Arp2/3 complex carrying mutations L199C in Arp2 and L117C in Arp3 (0.25 μM) was incubated with either 2.5 μM WCA, 1.25 µM CapZ-CA (mutant C206A), 1.25 μM pre-purified CapZ-CA/actin, or 5 µM Arpin CA for 30 min at RT in KMEI buffer supplemented with 0.2 mM ATP. BMOE (ThermoFisher Scientific), prepared fresh in dimethyl sulfoxide, was added to a final concentration of 16 μM. Reactions were performed at 21°C and quenched at the time points indicated in the figures with the addition of an equal volume of 2× SDS-loading buffer (LI-COR Biosciences) supplemented with 100 mM fresh β-mercaptoethanol. Samples were loaded onto 12% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad), and immunoblotted with anti-Arp3 (1:5,000 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-Arp2 (1:200 dilution, Cell Signaling Technologies) antibodies. Membranes were imaged using a G-BOX scanner (Syngene) and densitometric analysis was performed using Image Lab (Bio-Rad). Mean and SD values were calculated from three or more independent experiments (SI Appendix, Fig. S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Actin Acetylation Kinetics Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non–Ac-β/γ-actin (purified from NAA80 KO cells) at 10 μM in G-buffer, alone or in complex with profilin (prepared by mixing at 1:1.2 molar ratio), was incubated with E. coli–expressed NAA80FL at molar ratios of 1:50, 1:100, 1:200, and 1:400 (NAA80:actin) and 50 μM AcCoA. At the indicated time points (5, 10, 20, and 60 min; Fig. 2G and fig. S8), 10 μl of each sample was transferred to 10 μl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer. The samples were analyzed by Western blotting using isoform- and acetylation-specific mouse monoclonal anti–Ac-β-actin (1:5000; Abcam, ab6276) and rabbit polyclonal anti–pan-actin (1:2000; Cell Signaling Technology, 4968) antibodies. Densitometric analysis was performed using a G:BOX scanner (Syngene) and the Image Lab 6.0.1 software (Bio-Rad). For each blot, the band intensities were normalized to the 1:50 NAA80:actin-profilin band, which was always the strongest. Mean relative intensities and SD were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Arp2/3 Complex Crosslinking Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human Arp2/3 complex (crosslinking mutant, 0.25 μM) was incubated with 1.5 μM WCA, 5 μM Cort1-76, or 1.5 μM WCA + 5 μM Cort1-76 for 30 min at RT in ATP-supplemented KMEI buffer. Freshly prepared BMOE (ThermoFisher Scientific) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to a final concentration of 16 μM at 21 °C. Reactions were quenched at the indicated time points (Fig. 2) with the addition of an equal volume of 2x SDS-loading buffer (LI-COR Biosciences) supplemented with 100 mM β-mercaptoethanol. Samples were loaded onto 12% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad) and immunoblotted with anti-Arp3 antibody (1:5000 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-48344). Membranes were imaged using a G:BOX scanner (Syngene). Densitometric analysis was performed using Image Lab 6.1 (Bio-Rad). Mean and SD values were calculated from three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed on ice in lysis buffer (15 mM PBS, 2% NP-40, 0.2% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 1% protease inhibitor cocktail, 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktail). After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and protein concentration evaluated by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Lysates containing 10 to 20 μg of proteins were re-suspended in Laemmli buffer, then proteins were resolved on 10% acrylamide SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then electro-transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for Western blot (WB) analysis. Protein transfer was evaluated by red Ponceau S staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, CA, USA). The membranes were blocked in a 5% milk solution in TBS (0.1% Tween 20) and incubated 12 hours at 4°C with primary antibodies. The reactivity was revealed by incubation (1 hour at 20°C) with HRP-conjugated secondary rabbit anti-goat IgG followed by chemiluminescence reaction performed with electrochemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and film exposure. The WB bands reactivities were quantified by densitometry analysis using a G-Box scanner and the associated GeneSys software (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). The films were scanned and the bands optical density was measured with GeneTools software (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). Expression of α-tubulin was used as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mouse Gene Amplification and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1F (5’-ATCCAGAACCTGGTATCCTGTAATA-3’) and 1R (5’- GTCAATCCCACTGACTCACAACACAG-3’) and also 2F (5’- GAGTTCCTTGTCAAATCTCCAAAGCC-3’) and 2R (5’- GTCAATCCCACTGACTCACAACACAG-3’) amplified a 531 bp and 630 bp segments of the gene in wild type and mutant mouse, respectively.
Products were separated on 3% UltraPure™ Agarose gel in 1xTEA in the presence of GreenGlo Safe DNA Dye and bands were visualized on G:BOX scanner (Syngene, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!