The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

90plus bi mas

Manufactured by Brookhaven Instruments
Sourced in United States

The 90Plus/BI-MAS is a particle size analyzer that uses the technique of dynamic light scattering to measure the size of particles dispersed in a liquid. It is capable of measuring particle sizes ranging from 0.6 nanometers to 6 micrometers.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using 90plus bi mas

1

Particle Size Measurement by DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter of the particles was obtained by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using Brookhaven Instruments 90Plus/BI-MAS operating at room temperature. All measurements were made at a scattering angle of 90°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of DOX@PLA@Au-PEG-MnP Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (SEM) and FEI Tecnai G2 Sphera transmission electron microscope (TEM) were used to observe the morphology and structure of the nanoparticles. The size distributions and zeta potentials of the nanoparticles were evaluate using a 90Plus/BI-MAS instrument (Brookhaven Instruments Co., U.S.A). The UV/Vis absorption spectra of the nanoparticles were obtained by a Varian 4000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Both Au and Mn contents of the obtained DOX@PLA@Au-PEG-MnP NPs was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) after decomposing the nanocomposite by aqua regia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Chitosan Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each microparticle formulation was examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM; Tesla BS 343 operating at 15 KeV; ×3,300 magnification) to examine the morphology and size of the individual microparticles. Briefly, the freeze-dried microparticles were spread onto metallic discs and gold-coated (20 nm thick) using an EMS-550 automated sputter coater.
The Zeta potential of the chitosan microparticles was measured using a Zeta potential analyser (Zeta plus, Brookhaven Instruments Co., NY, USA). All Zeta potential measurements were determined at 25°C in an electric field of 11.00 V/cm. The size and polydispersity index were determined by light scattering using a multi-angle particle sizing option (90PLUS/BI-MAS, Brookhaven Instruments Co.). A stock solution of each chitosan microparticle sample (1.6 mg/ml in ultra-pure water) was used for both Zeta potential and particle size measurements. Ten millilitres of each solution were mixed with 10 ml of bi-filtered KCl (1 mM in ultra-pure water; pH 7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SPION Hydrodynamic Size and Zeta Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Brookhaven Instruments 90Plus/BI-MAS dynamic light scattering and zeta potential measurement instrument, operating at a scattering angle of 90° at room temperature, was used to determine the hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of the SPIONs. For hydrodynamic diameter measurements, particles were suspended at 1 mg/mL in deionized water. The zeta potential of the particles was measured in a 1 mM KNO3 solution at pH 7, adjusted with nitric acid and potassium hydroxide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Physiochemical Characterization of AmB-PGA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeta potential gives an indication of the charge acquired by a particulate system on its suspension in aqueous medium. The zeta potential of the nanoparticles was determined using DTS software (Malvern Instruments Limited, Malvern, UK) based on M3-PALS technology. The concentration of the AmB–PGA formulation used was 10−4 M. Particle size was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy (90Plus/BI-MAS, Brookhaven Instruments, Holtville, NY, USA). Samples were filtered using a 0.22 μm syringe filter (polyethersulfone, Millipore) to remove contamination with dust particles. Dynamic light scattering measurements were carried out using DynaPro-TC-04 equipment (Protein Solutions, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) equipped with a temperature-controlled microsampler. The size and surface morphology of the AmB-loaded nanoparticles were characterized using an electron microscope (CM-10, Philips, Hamburg, Germany). For transmission electron microscopy studies, the AmB–PGA formulation was used at a concentration of 10 μg/mL AmB equivalents in double-distilled water. The details of these procedures are provided in the Supplementary materials section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of HCPN-CG Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size of HCPN-CG (C for CPT and G for ICG) nanoparticles was assessed using a Brookhaven 90 Plus/BI-MAS dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument by dispersing the nanoparticles (1 mg/ml) in DI water. The morphology of nanoparticles was characterized using both transmission (TEM) and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy. For TEM studies, the nanoparticles were examined after negatively stained with uranyl acetate solution (2%, w/w) using an FEI (Moorestown, NJ, USA) Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope. The SEM experiments were conducted by depositing 10 μl of aqueous solutions of the nanoparticles on a freshly cleaved mica grid and allowing them to dry for 60 minutes in air. A thin film of Au was then sputtered onto the nanoparticles on the substrate. Samples were imaged with an FEI NOVA Nano400 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle Characterization by TEM and DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanoparticle was characterized using both transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS). First, nanoparticles were soaking in soaking in Phosphate Buffer (pH 7.4, pH 6.0) or Acetate Buffer (pH 5.0), respectively, for 6 h. For TEM study, the nanoparticles were negatively stained with uranyl acetate solution (2%, w/w) and examined using an FEI (Moorestown, NJ, USA) Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope. The nanoparticle size was determined using a Brookhaven (Holtsville, NY, USA) 90 Plus/BI-MAS dynamic light scattering instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Au Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample morphology was characterized by a transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit, Holland). The morphology and size of sample were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM, Dimension ICON, Bruker, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were acquired by using SSI S-Probe XPS spectrometer with Al Kα radiation as an X-ray source (1486 eV). The hydrodynamic size was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS, 90Plus/BI-MAS instrument, Brookhaven Instruments Co., USA). The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were characterized by infrared spectrometer (L16000300 Spectrum TWO LITA, Llantrisant, UK) between 4000 and 500 cm-l through a potassium bromide (KBr) pellet method. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a Discovery TGA 50 (USA) instrument by scanning from 25 to 600 °C under oxygen at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded by a UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Cary 60, Agilent Technologies, USA). The concentration of Au was measured using a Thermo inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) XSERIES 2. Samples for ICP-MS analysis were prepared by dissolving Au NCs-NAC in aqua regia for overnight and diluted with ultrapure water. The in vitro ROS detection was performed by confocal laser microscopy (LSM880, Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Membrane Vesicle Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The vesicle morphology was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The size distributions and zeta potentials of the vesicles were evaluated using a 90Plus/BI-MAS instrument (Brookhaven Instruments Co., USA). The phase transition temperature (Tm) was examined using a NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter® instrument. UV/Vis absorption spectra were measured using a Varian 4000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Western blotting was used to show the functional conservation of PLT biomarkers according to our previous method 27 (link). Proteins were extracted from PLT and TSPs. Protein solutions (not at the same concentration) were separated using SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. After a blocking step with 5% skim milk, the membrane was incubated with the primary antibody at 4 °C followed by incubation with the secondary antibody at room temperature. The bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) plus detection system (GE Healthcare). To verify the right-side-out membrane orientation of the PM in TSPs, we incubated TSPs with FITC-labeled antibodies against P-selection and CD47. Subsequently, the incubated TSPs were purified through a sepharose column, and their fluorescence intensities were detected. For the control, DMLs were also evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparation of Sildenafil-Loaded NO-Microbubbles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All phospholipids including 18 mg 1,2‐dihexadecanoyl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine (DPPC), 3.5 mg distearoyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine polyethylene glycol 2000 (DSPE‐PEG2000), 1 mg diphenyl phosphoryl azide (DPPA) and 2 mg Sildenafil (HY‐15025, MCE) were dissolved in 4 mL chloroform in a round‐bottom flask. Afterwards, the solution was evaporated at 60°C for about 0.5 h to form a phospholipid structure. Maintaining at 60°C for 0.5 h, the phospholipid film was then hydrated using 4 mL phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) to form Sildenafil‐loaded liposomes. Then, 0.5 mL Sildenafil‐loaded liposomes suspensions were put in a 1.5‐mL centrifuge tube and purged with different proportions of NO (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%) and perfluoropropane (C3F8) gas mixture continuously to replace the air inside. The admixture was then mechanically vibrated for 45 s at 70 Hz using a dental amalgamator (YG‐10, ZOGEAR, China) to obtain final different types of Sil‐NO‐MBs. The diameters of the MBs were detected using the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method (90 Plus/BI‐MAS, Brookhaven Instruments, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!