The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

46 protocols using d3100

1

Standardized Carcass Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photographic images of the left outer side of each carcass were taken. To acquire the images, each carcass’s left outer side was hung against a dark black background; care was taken to immobilize the carcasses before capturing the side-view image.
The images were captured using a digital camera (Nikon D3100) with an 8-megapixel sensor. The camera was pre-set as follows: with a manual operation mode, a shutter speed of 1/60s, F/4.5, ISO velocity of 400, without flash and a focal length of 26 mm. Captured images were saved in JPEG format. The entire process was developed under a constant standard artificial light and camera position. The camera was placed at 3 m from the carcasses. Two red dots were projected on a carcass for scale-bar purposes, emitted by two parallel lasers (650 nm wavelength) mounted on a frame with a predetermined distance. The acquired images were transferred to a computer for image analysis. All VIA measurements were performed using the image analysis Fiji software (ImageJ 1.49u) [16 ]. A total of 21 VIA measurements were recorded for the lateral view images, including areas (4), perimeters (4), angles (3), lengths (4) and widths (6), measured in different regions of the carcass (Figure 1). All measurements were defined as previously [14 (link),17 (link),18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Angiogenesis in Renal Regeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the capability of EPCs to improve angiogenesis in the renal regeneration model, angiogenesis and related angiogenic growth factors were evaluated. Rats in both groups were sacrificed postoperatively on week 1, 2 and 4, respectively. The recipient kidneys were harvested and pictures were taken using a digital camera (D3100, Nikon), and specimens were subsequently obtained from harvested recipient kidneys.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Palaeontological Specimen Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The new specimen is housed at the Museum of Palaeontology of the ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome (MPUR, Museo Paleontologico dell'Università di Roma), Lazio, Italy. Natural light photos were taken using a Canon EOS 1000D digital single-lens reflex camera. A Nikon D3100 digital single-lens reflex camera was used for UV light photography. A Nikon Coolpix S3600 compact digital camera was used for dissecting scope photomicrography. Line drawings were made by hand using photographs of the material at both natural and ultraviolet light, and by direct observation of the specimen. Digitizing and figure construction were accomplished using Adobe® Photoshop® (outlines and colouring) and Adobe® Illustrator® (labelling and final production), both version CC 17 (2013 release).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Fitness Traits in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Absolute fitness was calculated as total fruit count (TFC) × silique length × survival. TFC was measured as the count of fruits (siliques) + flowers + buds per individual. Silique length was measured in ImageJ from digital images of harvested field plants taken using a Nikon D3100 as follows: each plant was placed flat on a white sheet of paper next to a ruler and pictures were taken using auto focus. After setting the scale in ImageJ using the ruler placed in each image, the segmented line tool was used to draw a line from the pedicle to the tip of the silique. For each plant, eight siliques were measured at random and these values were averaged to get a value for each plant. Survival was scored on a binary (0–1) scale. Plants that germinated, were transplanted into the field and survived to harvest were given a survival score of 1 and plants that germinated and were transplanted but did not survive to harvest were given a score of 0. Individuals that did not germinate or did not survive to transplantation were given an NA. Relative fitness was calculated for each GSL genotype within each environment relative to Col-0. To do this, average absolute fitness of a GSL genotype was divided by the average absolute fitness of Col-0 within a environment. Col-0 was chosen as the reference genotype given that it is the background genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Galleria mellonella Survival Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Galleria mellonella larvae were selected using as criteria similar size and weight ranging 0.10–0.15 (g). For the survival experiments, each group consisted of 20 larvae. The selected larvae were inoculated by injecting 10 μL of the different inoculum in the last left pro-leg with a Hamilton syringe (0.75 mm diameter needle) according to Fuchs et al. (2010 (link)). The control group was inoculated with PBS and the same number of larvae. The following control groups were used in the experiment. The first group included the larvae that received 10 μL of PBS to monitoring survival mortality related to trauma. A second group of larvae (SHAM) received no injection and no injury. All larvae were placed in sterile Petri dishes and kept in the dark at 37°C. Mortality was monitored once per day. The death of the larvae was assessed by the lack of movement, no response to stimulation and discoloration of the cuticle. Melanization was checked every 24 h with a NIKON D3100 camera and images were analyzed. Survival curves were plotted and statistical analyses were performed using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test with Graph Pad Prism software. Statistical differences were set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Zebrafish Tumor Imaging and Drug Response Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photographs of all experimental subjects were obtained at day 10 and day 24 of the experimental timeline. Zebrafish were anesthetized, placed in a dish of fish water, and photographed using a mounted camera (Nikon D3100 with a Nikon AF-S Micro Lens). Tumor area was measured at day 10 and day 24 using a traceable digital caliper (Fisher, 14-648-17). The pigmented tumor area was calculated by the longest measured length and width of the tumor. The drug response was quantified via the change from baseline tumor area using the RECIST (Response Efficacy Criteria in Solid Tumors) guidelines (Eisenhauer et al., 2009 (link)). The response rate for experimental cohorts was depicted via waterfall plots, and t-test statistics were applied for significance (Gillespie, 2012 (link)). Fluorescence imaging of FITC-dextran utilized a Nikon scope with a 0.5× objective lens (Nikon SMZ18-DSRi2)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Investigating Virus Movement via PDLP5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two mature leaves (4th and 5th counting from the oldest) were first infiltrated with Agrobacteria harboring individual pMB35S vectors carrying no insert (empty vector) or encoding intact or mutated forms of PDLP5. Three days later, the same leaves were infiltrated again with Agrobacterial carrying a binary vector with a recombinant TMV genome encoding free GFP (TMV-GFP). The plants were monitored for systemic viral movement over the next several days. For the primary infiltration, Agrobacteria carrying no insert or encoding intact or mutated PDLP5 were diluted in infiltration buffer to OD 0.8. Agrobacteria carrying the viral suppressor protein p19 were diluted to OD 0.6. Agrobacteria suspension were mixed in equal volumes before infiltration of target leaves. Agrobacteria carrying TMV-GFP were diluted to OD 0.02. Plants were imaged under UV illumination through a deep yellow filter mounted on a Nikon D3100 digital camera. Viral movement assays were performed using at least 5 plants per treatment and the experiments were performed at least 3 times. Quantitative measurement was performed on a representative set of plants by using a manual scoring scheme to evaluate the extent to which the virus moved systemically based on the GFP fluorescence levels detectable at the shoot tip.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Xenograft Transplantation of Zebrafish Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult zebrafish used as recipients were immunosuppressed to avoid rejection of the donor material. They were anesthetized using a dual anesthetic protocol to minimize overexposure to tricaine [42 (link)]. Briefly, fish were treated with tricaine and then transferred to tricaine/isoflurane solution. Afterward, fish were treated with split sublethal dose (30 Gy) of X-irradiation (YXLON SMART 200E, 200 kV, 4.5 mA) 2 days before transplantation. Around 20 anesthetized fish per tumor were injected with 300,000 cells into the dorsal subcutaneous cavity using a 26S-gauged syringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA). The syringe was washed in 70% ethanol and rinsed with PBS between uses. After transplantation, fish were placed into a recovery tank with fresh fish water and returned to the system. Finally, these transplanted fish were tracked weekly for a month, anesthetized, and photographed with a mounted camera (Nikon D3100 with a Nikon AF-S Micro Lens) to follow the growth of tumor cells in the injection site. The size of the pigmented tumor was then measured using Adobe Photoshop 2022 as the number of pigmented pixels. Tumor scoring was blinded, and experiments were independently repeated at least three times. For the DN-DUOX1 condition, five different tumors were transplanted, while for the GFP condition, three different tumors were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Head Posture and Body Gravity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We attached markers to participants in 21 locations (ears, distal ends of metacarpal III, distal ends of phalanges, shoulder joints, elbow joints, hand joints, hip joints, knee joints, foot joints, vertex, upper margin of sternum, and navel). Furthermore, we asked the participants to assume an erect and immobile posture for photographs and to stand at attention in front of a wall with horizontal lines drawn at 10-cm intervals. We installed a digital camera (D3100, Nikon Co., Tokyo, Japan) at the height of 80 cm, 1 m away from the participants, and acquired still participants’ images from the coronal and sagittal planes. We performed a two-dimensional image analysis from the image of the sagittal plane [20 ,21 ]. We printed out an enlarged photo of each participant, and we drew a line on each segment from the marker. Further, we calculated the position of gravity of each segment obtained with reference to the mass ratio of each part and position of the center of gravity of the Japanese body [20 ]. Then, we calculated the body center of gravity (COG) from the mass ratio. We drew a midline from the COG and measured the distance between the line and ear position. The distance was calculated as the “degree of forward lean (cm)” of the head (Figure 1) [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Standardized Wound Healing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wound healing assays were conducted by means of the specific culture insert with respect to the supplier’s instructions (IBIDI, Germany). WT and TNFR2 KO-MSCs were seeded in the two separate wells of the insert at 15 × 103 cells/ml in a final volume of 70 μl/well, to acquire a confluent layer within 24 h. To create a 500 μm homogeneous cell-free gap, culture inserts were carefully removed. The wounded area appearance was instantaneously captured by taking pictures (Nikon D3100, Japan) using objectives 4× and 10× of the microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE T5100) and continued every 2 h, until complete closure in WT-MSC group. Cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. The decrease in wounded area was analyzed by measuring the scratch area size using the plugin MRI Wound Healing Tool for Image J (NIH, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!