The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jem 2100f microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United Kingdom, United States

The JEM-2100F is a field emission scanning transmission electron microscope (FE-STEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analytical capabilities. It features a LaB6 electron source and advanced electron optics to deliver a sub-Ångström electron beam. The microscope is capable of performing various imaging modes, including bright-field, dark-field, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

144 protocols using jem 2100f microscope

1

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV–vis absorption spectra was tested on a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrometer. Fluorescence spectra was recorded on a Fluorescence spectrophotometer (HITACHI F-4600 (Japan)), the excitation wavelength was 480 nm. ESI–MS were acquired on Bruker microTOF-Q system. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a JEOL JEM 2100F microscope operating at 200 kV. ICP-MS was tested with Agilent 7500 CE (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Native PAGE was carried out on a Bio-Rad Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra Cell or PROTEAN® II xi Cell system. Stacking and resolving gels were prepared from 4 and 15 wt% acrylamide monomers, respectively. Negative electrophoretic buffer containing Tricine. PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare UK Ltd) containing 8.3 mL of SephadexTM G-25 medium with a molecular weight exclusion limit of 5000 Da.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was performed with a Hitachi HT-7700 (Japan) operating at 120 kV. HRTEM was carried out on an FEI Tecnai G2 F20 microscope (USA) or a JEOL JEM-2100F microscope (Japan), and both were operated at 200 kV. EDXS spectra were collected using JEM-2100F equipped with an energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer (Oxford-T80, NanoLab Technologies Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Modified TiO2 Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tetrabutyltitanate (99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), concentrated sulfuric acid (AR, Wokai, Shanghai, China), hydrofluoric acid (AR, Aladdin), anhydrous ethanol (99.5%, Hushi, Shanghai, China), phenanthroline monohydrate (99%, Aladdin), and deionized water were used.
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6610LV, JEOL, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F microscope, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) experiments were performed to observe microstructure. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker Ltd, Bremen, Germany) at a scanning rate of 6° min−1 with 2θ ranging from 20° to 80°, using CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). FTIR spectra were recorded on a Magna 560 FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet Ltd, Green Bay, WI, USA). UV/Vis absorption spectra were recorded on a UV-2550 UV/Vis spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) in the range 200–800 nm. An X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, PHI5000 ESCA, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Al Kα source (1486.6 eV photons) was used to characterize the modifying of Aphen on TiO2. A Keithley 4200A-SCS parameter analyzer (Tektronix Ltd, Beaverton, OR, USA) was used to record the photocurrent of sensor chip in different explosive vapors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transmission Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images of TEM were taken on a JEOL JEM-2100F microscope, of which the acceleration voltage was 200 kV. The images of HR-TEM were obtained by using a Philips Tecnai F20 instrument with the acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The element mapping results and EDS analysis were acquired from the same machine under STEM mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electron Microscopy Characterization of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STEM analyses were performed with a JEOL JEM-2100F microscope operated at 200 kV. TEM analyses were performed with a JEOL JEM-2000EX microscope operated at 120 kV. A few droplets of the stock solution were put on a microgrid carbon polymer supported on a copper grid and allowed to dry out at room temperature for TEM and STEM observations. The samples were evacuated under ultrahigh vacuum for 20 min in the microscope before observations. For TEM characterization, phosphotungstic acid was used as the staining reagent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNP samples were characterized by UV/vis absorption (Shimadzu UV 1800; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The structural analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Shimadzu XRD 7000) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Jeol JEM-2100F microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan; accelerating voltage 200 kV, point-to-point resolution 0.19 nm). The chemical analysis of the SNP solutions was carried out using an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy module (INCA, Oxford Instruments, Bristol, UK) attached to TEM (Jeol JEM-2100F). The size of the SNPs was characterized using TEM. Aliquots of the SNP solutions (5 and 10 μg/mL) were dropped onto a lacey carbon film supported by a copper grid and then air-dried before TEM observation. The particle sizes were characterized using conventional bright-field TEM images, and the structures were determined based on selected area electron diffraction patterns obtained from relatively large groups of particles. The mean size and standard deviation were calculated in random fields containing various numbers of particles. The morphology of the SNPs was analyzed by atomic force microscopy (SOLVER P47; ND-MDT, Moscow, Russia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Material Characterization by Advanced Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the materials was examined by a FEG250 field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) from Quanta, America. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out using a JEM-2100F microscope from JEOL Ltd., Japan. The specific surface area was studied by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, and the pore size distribution was obtained from the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms using a NOVA 2000e analyser from Quantachrome Instruments, America. Fourier-transformed infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded using a VECTOR22 spectrometer from Bruker, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Nanomaterial Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The powder X-ray
diffraction (XRD) characterization for phase identification was performed
on a Rigaku D/max-2550 X-ray diffractometer with high-intensity Cu
Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) radiation in the range of 5–90°.
The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) characterization
for morphological and microstructural evaluation was obtained on a
ZEISS Gemini300 microscope operating at 15 kV. The transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) characterizations
for interfacial and crystallographic analysis were examined on a JEOL
(JEM-2100F) microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization for chemical
state recognition was conducted on an EscaLab Xi + photoelectron spectrometer.
UV–vis–NIR diffuse reflectance spectra for band gap
estimation were acquired on a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV–vis–NIR
spectrophotometer. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra for defect level
speculation were tested on a Hitachi F-7000 luminescence spectrometer
using a Xe lamp with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. The specific
surface area of the sample was calculated through the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) equation based on the nitrogen adsorption isotherm, which was
measured on a Micromeritics Gemini VII apparatus (surface area and
porosity system) with prior degassing of the product under vacuum
at 120 °C overnight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H NMR
spectra of the ILs were recorded using an NMR tube filled with DMSO-d6 on an ECX 400 spectrometer (JEOL). Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images were captured using a JEOL JEM-2100F
microscope operated at 200 kV. The TEM samples were prepared by placing
a drop of catalyst powder dispersion in deionized water onto a carbon-film-coated
Cu grid, followed by drying under ambient conditions. Identical location
TEM characterizations were carried out by using carbon-coated Au finder
grids (G200F1, Quantifoil). More details about identical location
TEM measurements can be found in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. The loading amounts of Pt on SCILL
samples were determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission
spectrometry (ICP-AES, PerkinElmer Plasma 400). Electrochemical Pt
dissolution tests were carried out on an in situ scanning flow cell
coupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (SFC-ICP-MS)
(NexION 300X, PerkinElmer) as described in previous works.45 (link),46 (link) The measurement procedures are detailed in the Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microfluidic Protein Aggregation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aggregated proteins from the microfluidic device were obtained by excising the PDMS block from the glass slides using a sterile scalpel and flushing the surfaces repeatedly with 100 μl of ultrafiltered deionized water. The collected liquid was refrigerated along with the remaining liquid in the reservoirs until further analysis. Procedures for collecting aggregated proteins from shaking experiments as well as for EM sample preparation were described previously7 (link). Negative stain EM data were collected on a JEOL JEM1400 electron microscope with a Gatan Orius 832 CCD. Cryo-EM data were collected on a JEOL JEM-2100F microscope with K2 Summit direct detector. Data were processed using EMAN259 (link) and RELION-445 (link) software packages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!