The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Morpholino

Manufactured by Gene Tools
Sourced in United States

Morpholinos are synthetic oligonucleotides designed to modulate gene expression by binding to and blocking the translation or splicing of target messenger RNA (mRNA) sequences. They work by sterically hindering the progression of the ribosome complex along the mRNA, preventing the translation of the target gene.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

190 protocols using morpholino

1

Zebrafish Gene Knockdown Using Morpholinos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To knockdown gene function, the following amounts of morpholinos (Gene Tools) were injected into the yolk at one cell stage: 2,5 ng of a splice morpholino for the sara gene (5’-TGAACTAGAGACTTTACCTTGCCAC-3’) (Kressmann et al., 2015 (link)), 2 ng of p53 MO, (5’-GCGCCATTGCTTTGCAAGAATTG-3’ [Robu et al., 2007 (link)]), 1 ng of standard control morpholino (5’-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3’), 1 ng of a translation blocking morpholino for the notch1b gene (5’-GTATTGCATTCTCCTCTCCCGTCTG-3’), 0.41 ng of a translation blocking morpholino for the gene deltaC (MO1, 5’-AGCCATCTTTGCCTTCTTGTCTGCT-3’) (Zhang et al., 2008 (link)), and 2 ng of another translation blocking morpholino for the gene deltaC (MO2, 5’-CGATAGCAGACTGTGAGAGTAGTCC-3’) (Holley et al., 2002 (link); Okigawa et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zebrafish Knockdown of amotL2 Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish were housed and mated in the Karolinska Institute zebrafish facility under standard conditions and in agreement with the regulations set out by the Swedish Board of Agriculture for the use of laboratory animals in scientific research. All experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the regional ethics board (Jordbruksverket.se). For the knock-down amotL2 in zebrafish embryos the following morpholino oligonucleotides were used:
morpholino knockdown of amotL2b: 5′ TGAGTATTTATGATCTGAGCTGAAC 3′; morpholino knockdown amotL2a: 5′ CTGATGATTCCTCTGCCGTTCTCAT 3′
Control morpholino amotL2 mismatch: 5′ CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA 3′. morpholinos were purchased from Gene Tools (Philomath, Oregon, USA). AmotL2b MO was injected at 3 ng/embryo and the amotL2a MO was injected at 1.5 ng/embryo.
For rescue experiments, a mRNA encoding human AMOTL2 were synthesized using the SP6 Message Machine kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and 50 pg per embryo were co-injected together with the morpholinos. morpholino-injected zebrafish embryos were maintained at 28 °C in standard E3 water supplemented with 0.003% phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU). Embryos were fixed in 4% PFA PBS at 28hpf for cell area analysis and at 34 hpf quantification of cell side distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted JPH2 knockdown in SMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oligonucleotide used to specifically knock down JPH2 protein expression via steric inhibition of mRNA translation (morpholino) was designed and synthesized by Gene Tools. The sequence of the Jph2-targeting morpholino was 5′-TCA TCT CAT CCT CGC TCC TGA CAA C-3′. A nonsilencing morpholino (5′-CCT CTT ACC TCA GTT ACA ATT TAT A-3′; Gene Tools) with no known binding targets in rodents was used as a control for all experiments. After aseptically dissecting intact arteries from the brain or mesentery, morpholinos were delivered into SMCs by placing arteries in a 24-well plate containing 1 mL of serum‐free DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with Endo-Porter transfection reagent (6 µM; Gene Tools) and 10 µM control or Jph2-targeting morpholinos. Transfected cerebral arteries were cultured in this solution at 37 °C/5% CO2 for 48 h prior to experimentation. The efficiency of JPH2 knockdown was determined by comparing JPH2 protein expression levels in cerebral arteries treated with control and Jph2-targeting morpholinos using the Wes protein analysis system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Knockdown of sara and p53 genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To knock down gene function, the following amounts of morpholinos (Gene Tools) were injected into the yolk at 1-cell stage: 2,5 ng of a splice morpholino for the sara gene 5' -TGAACTAGAGACTTTA CCTTGCCAC-3', (Kressmann et al., 2015) (link) and 2 ng of p53 MO, 5'-GCGCCATTGCTTTGCAAGAATTG-3' (Robu et al., 2007) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Zebrafish Embryo Manipulation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All zebrafish experiments were performed in accordance with IACUC regulations. Injections and in situ hybridizations were performed as previously described (47 (link), 53 (link)). Quantification by flow cytometry using fluorescently labeled transgenic zebrafish embryos was performed as previously described (96 (link), 97 (link)). Morpholinos were purchased from Gene Tools, LLC (Philomath, OR, USA).
Zebrafish embryos at the one-cell stage were injected with Morpholinos (MOs). The sequence of the Morpholinos targeting the exon 4-intron 4 (MO1) and the exon 5-intron 5 (MO2) of D. rerio lat3a (please see “Bioinformatic and statistical analysis” for accession numbers) were as follows: lat3a MO1: 5′-ATAGATCATGTACTCACCTTCTGGT-3′; lat3a MO2: 5′-CATTTTCTGCTGCTCCTTACCGTTA-3′. The MO targeting zebrafish lat1 (NM_001128358) at the exon 1-intron 1 boundary was 5′-AGGTAACAGTTTACTTACGTATACA-3′.
Zebrafish embryos at 19 hpf (20 somites) were chemically dechorionated with pronase (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and treated with DMSO (vehicle), 50 μM rapamycin, 1 μM torin 1, or 10 μM 4EGI-1 and o-dianisidine stained at 72 hpf (96 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Morpholino-Mediated Protein Knockdown in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five morpholinos
(Genetools, USA) were designed and used, consisting of standard control
MO, 5′-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3′;
UCHL1 ATG MO1, 5′-TATTTCCATCGGTTTCCACTCCATG-3′;
UCHL1 splice MO2 (target exon 4), 5′-GTTCCTTAAACATATCCACTTACCA-3′;
PARK7 splice MO1 (target exon 2), 5′-TATGTAAAGTCAGACCTGTTTGTG-3′;
and PARK7 splice MO2 (target exon 3), 5′-AAAACAGATTTGTACCTCAGAAAGG-3′.
The single-cell stage of zebrafish embryos was injected with 2 ng
of morpholinos into the yolk area. Approximately 200 embryos were
injected for each group within 30 min. Bright-field images of 2 dpf
zebrafish embryos were acquired with a DMi8 inverted fluorescence
microscope (Leica). Fluorescent images of 4 dpf zebrafish embryos
were acquired with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Leica). Three
representative images were taken and analyzed. Statistical analysis
was performed using Graphpad Prism 8 software. Numerical data from
triplicates are presented as the mean ± SD. Two-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) has been used to analyze multiple subjects. Bright-field
images of 6 dpf zebrafish embryos were acquired with a M50 stereo
zoom microscope (Leica). Representative images are shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microinjection of Morpholinos for Opsin2 and ChAT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microinjection, we used injection buffer (24% glycerol, 20 mM HEPES pH 8.0 and 120 mM KCl). The morpholino (Gene Tools, Philomath, OR, USA) sequences are in the reagent table, and the in-needle concentration with injection buffer was 1.0 mM. Two nonoverlapping translation-blocking morpholinos for Opsin2 and ChAT were used to confirm the function specificity (S1 and S2 Figs). For negative control experiments, we injected a random MO or only injection buffer. The concentrations of MOs in the needles were as follows:
Opsin2-MO1 (0.4 mM), 5’-AGTTTGCCATCTTTGTGTTGCTTCG -3’
Opsin2-MO2 (0.4 mM), 5’-CGCCAATAACCACTGATCACAGTCG -3’
ChAT-MO1 (0.2 mM), 5’-ACGATTAGGCATGTGGTTCATGTAT -3’
ChAT-MO2 (1.0 mM), 5’-TGGAACGTCCAATAGTGGTATTGTA -3’
Gcm-MO, 5’-GCTTTGGACTAACCTTTTGCACCAT -3’ [34 (link)], and
Random-MO (1.0 mM).
Microinjections into fertilized eggs were performed as previously described [60 (link), 61 ]. After microinjection, the embryos were washed with FSW three times and stored with 50 μg/ml kanamycin until the desired stages were reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microinjection Techniques for Sea Urchin Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microinjection was performed according to a previously described method [54 ] with injection buffer (24% glycerol, 20 mM HEPES pH 8.0 and 120 mM KCl). The morpholino (Gene Tools, Philomath, OR, USA) sequences and the in-needle concentrations in injection buffer were as follows:
Go-Opsin MO1 (0.8–1.0 mM): 5′-ATCTTCTTGAATATGCTTCCGCGCC-3′,
Go-Opsin MO2 (1.0–1.5 mM): 5′-ACGAATTCATTGTGGTCAAATCCGC-3′,
5HT2 MO1 (0.5–1.0 mM): 5′-GGAAAGGAACATCTCAGATCGGCCT-3′,
5HT2 MO2 (0.5 mM): 5′-GATGTCCTTATGGTATGTGCA-3′,
nNOS MO1 (1.0–1.5 mM): 5′-GGAAAGGAACATCTCAGATCGGCCT-3′ (previously characterized) [23 ], and
TPH MO (1.2 mM): 5′-ACAGAGTAGGACGTTGATGATCTAT-3′ (the specificity was checked by immunohistochemistry for serotonin (Additional file 1: Fig. S4D)).
Two non-overlapping translation-blocking morpholinos for Go-Opsin and 5HT2 were used to confirm the specificity of their function (Additional file 1: Fig. S6b, 7c). For negative control experiments, we injected random MO (1.0–1.5 mM, Gene Tools, Additional file 1: Fig. S6a) or injection buffer only.
The DNA construct for the putative cis-regulatory element of 5HT2 was prepared and injected as previously described [55 ]. Five thousand base-pairs of the genomic DNA of H. pulcherrimus were isolated and combined with a DNA sequence encoding Venus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Morpholino-Mediated Knockdown in Sea Urchin Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morpholino (Gene Tools, Philomath, OR, USA) sequences and the in-needle concentration with 24% glycerol were as follows:
Hbn-MO1 (0.7 mM): 5’- AAAATGAACGGAACAAGTCCAGTGT -3’,
Hbn-MO2 (2.0 mM): 5’- TAGGAGAACCAACGACCGCCGTCAT -3’,
Nodal-MO (0.2 mM): 5’- AGATCCGATGAACGATGCATGGTTA -3’,
Lefty-MO (0.4 mM): 5’- AGCACCGAGTGATAATTCCATATTG -3’,
FoxQ2-MO (0.2 mM): 5’- TCATGATGAAATGTTGGAACGAGAG -3’,
BMP2/4-MO (0.4 mM): 5’- GACCCCAATGTGAGGTGGTAACCAT -3’,
LRP6-MO1 (1.9 mM): 5’- GAAAGGTTTCAAGGCAGCCCATTTC -3’,
LRP6-MO2 (1.5 mM): 5’- TGCCGTTGACTAAATATCATCTACA -3’,
Wnt6-MO1 (3.8 mM): 5’- ACGTGTCCACTCCATCTTGTAATAC -3’,
Wnt6-MO2 (1.9 mM): 5’- TCGTCCAGCGATTTAATAAAGAGCT -3’,
Wnt7-MO1 (3.8 mM): 5’- ATAACCACACCAAgTTgggCCgCAT -3’, and
Wnt7-MO2 (1.9 mM): 5’- GCTCAGCGATGCCCGATGGATAAAA -3’.
Two non-overlapping morpholinos that blocked the translation of Hbn, LRP6, Wnt6 and Wnt7 were used to confirm the specificity of their function. For negative control experiments, we injected 24% glycerol into eggs.
mRNAs were synthesized from linearized plasmids using the mMessage mMachine kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and injected at the indicated concentrations in 24% glycerol in needles: hbn-mRNA (0.1 μg/μl), Δ-cadherin (0.3–0.6 μg/μl; [22 (link)]), and myc-mRNA (0.1 μg/μl). Microinjections into fertilized eggs and into one blastomere at the two-cell stage were performed as previously described [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microinjection of Morpholinos for Developmental Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microinjection was performed according to a previously described method (Yaguchi, 2019 (link)) with injection buffer (24% glycerol, 20 mM HEPES pH 8.0 and 120 mM KCl). The morpholino (Gene Tools, Philomath, OR, United States) sequences and the in-needle concentrations in injection buffer were as follows:
Rx-MO1 (1.9–3.8 mM): 5′- GGG​TGA​TGC​GCT​CCA​TCC​ATT​GTT​A -3′,
Rx-MO2 (1.0–1.9 mM): 5′- TTT​GTG​ACT​GAT​CGT​CTT​TCC​AAA​C -3′,
Msi1-MO1 (0.5–1.0 mM): 5′- AAC​CCT​CAA​CTA​AAA​AGG​CCC​AAT​A-3′,
Msi1-MO2 (1.9 mM): 5′- GAA​TTG​GCA​AAC​GGT​CCT​TCT​TAA​C-3′,
and Hbn-MO1 (0.7 mM): 5′- AAA​ATG​AAC​GGA​ACA​AGT​CCA​GTG​T -3’.
(previously characterized) (Yaguchi and Yaguchi, 2019 (link)).
Two non-overlapping translation-blocking morpholinos for Rx and Musashi were used to confirm the specificity of their function (Supplementary Figures S1, S2). For negative control experiments, we injected random MO (2.0 mM: Gene Tools, Supplementary Figure S1) or injection buffer only.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!