The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using sybr green 1 solution

1

Alkaline Comet Assay for DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alkaline comet assay was performed as described previously by [74 (link)] with some modifications. Briefly, cells were seeded in tissue culture flasks and incubated for 12 and 24 h with 3a at 10 μM. After checking the cell viability rate (at least 70% of viable cells), two hundred thousand cells were suspended in 0.5% low melting point agarose (Sigma-Aldrich). Cellular suspension was spread into microscope slides pre-coated with 1.5% normal-melting point agarose (Sigma-Aldrich). After lysis, electrophoresis was performed. Finally, the samples were neutralized, fixed, and stained with SYBR® Green I solution (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). The analysis was performed using a fluorescence microscope at 20× magnification. The images were analyzed using the ImageJ [73 (link)] plugin OpenComet [75 (link)] to demarcate the “head” and the “tail” regions of each comet. Samples treated with ultraviolet light were used as a positive control. Fifty randomly selected nuclei were analyzed sample. The analysis was done by the extent of DNA damage (tail moment).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Fusarium Fungal DNA in Grains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fungal genomic DNA in kernels was quantified using qPCR as described (Brandfass and Karlovsky, 2008 (link)). Dried grains were ground and DNA was extracted from 30 mg of flour and dissolved in 50 μl of TE buffer. One microliter of 50x diluted DNA was used as template for RT-PCR with primers amplifying a 280-bp fragment specific for Fg. The PCR mix consisted of reaction buffer [16 mM (NH4)2SO4, 67 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% Tween-20, pH 8.8 at 25°C; 3 mM MgCl2, 0.3 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dATP, dTTP, dCTP and dGTP (Bioline), 0.03 U/μl Taq DNA polymerase (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany) and 0.1x SYBR Green I solution (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany)]. The PCR was performed in CFX384 thermocycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the following cycling condition: initial denaturation for 2 min at 95°C, 35 cycles with 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 61°C, 30 s at 68°C, and final elongation for 5 min at 68°C. No matrix effects were detectable with 50-fold diluted DNA extracted from grains. Standards were prepared from pure Fg DNA in 3-fold dilution steps from 100 pg to 0.4 pg/well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing SOX9 Binding Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An EMSA was used to directly visualize monomeric or dimeric binding of SOX9 proteins towards a 36 bp palindromic, oligonucleotide probe with two binding sites spaced 4 bp apart (CC36, GGGATCCTACACAAAGCCGGCTTTGTGTAGGATCCC) Annealing of CC36 was achieved by slow cooling a 100 μM solution in phosphate buffered saline from 95°C to room temperature. A binding reaction typically contained 2 μM oligonucleotide duplex and a 0.5–4 μM concentration of protein in a buffer of 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 6.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA. After incubation on ice for 30 min, complexes were resolved using a 10% Tris-borate-EDTA gel. After soaking the gel for 15 min in a 1:10000 SYBR-Green-I solution (Invitrogen), visualization was performed using an Alpha Imager HP system (Alpha-Innotech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Verticillium longisporum DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA from hypocotyl samples was extracted using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [38 (link)]. About 100 mg of ground fresh plant tissue was suspended in 1 ml CTAB with 2 µl ß-mercaptoethanol and 1 µl 1x proteinase K. The extracted DNA was dissolved in 200 µl TE buffer.
A CFX384 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Kabelsketal, Germany) was used for the amplification and quantification of V. longisporum DNA using primers OLG70 (5′-CAGCGAAACGCGATATGTAG-3′) and OLG71 (5′-GGCTTGTAGGGGGTTTAGA-3′) [39 (link)]. The amplification mix consisted of 1× (NH4)2SO4 buffer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 100 µM of dNTPs, 0.02 U/µl of BioTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), 0.1x SYBR Green I solution (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.3 µM each of primers OLG70 and OLG71 and 1 µl of template DNA and filled up to a total volume of 10 µl with ddH2O. PCR conditions were as described in Table 3. PCR for all treatment samples were performed with four biological and three technical replicates and data were analyzed using CFX Manager Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Candida Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Candida cells at logarithmic phase of growth (1 × 106 cells/mL) were treated with NPV or NMV (1, 10, 100 and 1000 µg/mL) for 2 h; the cells were then washed, resuspended in TE buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8 containing 50 mM EDTA) and fixed using 95% ethanol. Cells were then washed using TE buffer and treated with 1 mg/mL RNAse A at 37 °C for 1 h and then treated with 5 mg/mL Proteinase K at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells were then washed using TE buffer and resuspended in a SYBR Green I solution (1:85 dilution of a commercial stock in TE buffer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Stained cells were then resuspended in TE buffer, and the phases of cell cycle (G1, S and G2/M) were analyzed using an Amnis® FlowSight® (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) imaging flow cytometer and IDEAS software version 6.2.187.0 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Representative histograms (normalized frequency vs intensity) are presented.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Cell-Free DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluation of the cfDNA concentration was also performed measuring the fluorescence of intercalating dye [24 (link)]. Specifically, 5 μL of a sample or the same volume of a standard dilution of genomic DNA (Human HCT116 DKO Nonmethylated DNA) with known concentration (0 ng/mL and 9 serial dilutions from 1 to 256 ng/mL) was added to 195 μL of a SYBR Green I solution (Cat. number S7585, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in PBS buffer (1 : 10,000) and to black 96-well plates (PAA, Cat. number PAA30296X, Austria) and incubated for 10 min. Two to three identical mixtures were prepared from each sample or standard for greater accuracy. The fluorescence of the mixtures obtained was measured by the “VICTOR3 1420-050” Multilabel Plate Readers (Perkin Elmer, USA) using filters for FITC (485/535 nm) and 1 s acquisition time. The DNA concentration was calculated from the standard curve (R2 was 0.97).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Cycle Analysis via Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated with 1 mg/mL RNAse A at 37°C for 1 h followed by 5 mg/mL Proteinase K at 37°C for another 1 h. After washing with TE buffer, cells were resuspended in a SYBR Green I solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 4°C overnight. Flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and the IDEAS software version 6.2.187.0 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were used to determine the phases of the cell cycle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Enumeration of Bacteria and VLPs Using Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria and VLPs were enumerated using an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson), which was fitted with a 488 nm blue laser and green (530/30 nm), orange (585/40 nm) and red (670 nm) filters. Prior to analysis, triplicate samples were thawed and diluted to 1:10 with 0.2 μm filtered TE buffer (10mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8). Samples were then stained with SYBR Green-I solution (1:20000 dilution; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and incubated in the dark at 80°C for 10 min [26 (link)]. As an internal size and fluorescence standard, 1 μm diameter fluorescent beads (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were added to each samples at a final concentration of approximately 105 beads ml-1 [29 ]. For each sample, forward scatter, side scatter and green (SYBR Green-I) fluorescence were acquired for two minutes. FlowJo (Treestar, Inc.) software was used to analyse data collected from each sample, where differences in cell side scatter and SYBR Green fluorescence were used to discriminate between VLP and bacterial groups [26 (link),30 (link),31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometric Enumeration of Soil Microbes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell numbers in extracted soil communities and in the mixed liquid suspended growth experiments were counted by flow cytometry. SC-suspensions were diluted 100 times in MMS and stained in 200 µl aliquots with 2 µl of diluted SYBR Green I solution (1:100 in DMSO; Molecular Probes) in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. In some experiments, cells were additionally stained with 2 µl propidium iodide solution (10 µg ml–1, Molecular Probes). Aliquots of 20 µl were aspired at 14 µl min–1 on a Novocyte flow cytometer with absolute volumetric cell counting (ACEA Biosciences, USA). Cells were thresholded above a forward scatter signal (FSC-H) of 20 and further gated for propidium iodide-staining (excited at 535 nm and its fluorescence was collected at 617 ± 30 nm) and for SYBR Green I (excitation 488 nm, 530 ± 30 nm band-pass filter; channel voltage at 441 V) above values of 1000 (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Cell samples from the mixed liquid suspension growth experiments were diluted to approximately 106 ml−1 and subsampled to aliquots of 100 µl. The subsamples were then mixed with 100 µl of 8 g l–1 sodium azide in phosphate buffered saline and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C to arrest cell respiration and growth. Samples were then stained with SYBR Green I as above and quantified by flow cytometry using the same thresholds and gates as describe above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Establishing Bacterial Culture Standards for FCM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The yeast and 14 bacterial pure cultures that were used as standards in building ANN classifiers are listed in Table 1. The strains were initially selected on the basis of their occurrence in aquatic systems, and with the aim of including variation in size and morphology (e.g., rod, coccus), as well as groups of strains with similar taxonomy (e.g., Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter, Sphingomonas). Strains were grown aseptically and individually in liquid media in biological triplicates until reaching stationary phase (conditions provided in Supplementary Table 1). For E. coli, we further included samples from exponential growth (OD600 = 0.5) and from stationary phase (OD600 = 2) on two different culture media (Supplementary Table 1). Culture samples were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to 105 or 106 cells ml–1 and stained in 200 µl aliquots with 2 µl of diluted SYBR Green I solution (1:100 in dimethylsulfoxide; Molecular Probes) in the dark for 15–30 min at 20 °C for FCM analysis.
Bead standards consisted of polystyrene size calibration beads with diameters of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 15 µm (Invitrogen), used in solution at concentrations of 1 × 106 (0.2 and 0.5 µm), 6 × 107 (1 µm), 3 × 107 (2 and 4 µm) and 2 × 107 (6, 10, and 15 µm) beads ml–1. Beads were stored and prepared for FCM analysis according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!