The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using ezinfo

1

Metabolomic Analysis of Dormant Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained LC/ESI-MS and LDI-MS data were processed by MarkerLynx XS a software extension of MassLynx platform (Waters). The processed data matrix, i.e., after extraction, normalization and alignment of retention times (in case of LC/ESI-MS data), m/z-values and intensities of signals, were transferred to Extended Statistics (XS) module, EZinfo (Umetrics, Malmo, Sweden), and studied by principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Both PCA and OPLS-DA were used for reduction of data dimensionality. OPLS-DA is a multivariate statistical method employing latent variable regression developed as an extension of more frequently used partial least squares method (Trygg and Wold, 2002 (link)). Coordinates of particular samples and RT_m/z pairs (or m/z-values in the case of LDI-MS data) in appropriate biplots and S-plots were used for evaluation of dormant and non-dormant genotypes mutual segregation and significance of detected signals of metabolites. The procedure was adopted and modified from Kučera et al. (2017 (link)). The most significant markers were further studied by targeted MS/MS experiments to reveal their identity (Cechová et al., in preparation; Válková et al., in preparation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomic and Lipidomic Analysis of Human Meibum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transcriptomic datasets were processed using Expression and Transcriptome Analysis Consoles (v.4.0.1.36; both from Affymetrix) and SigmaStat (v.3.5, from Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The default (and currently the industry standard) filter criteria: (1) (+2) < LFC < (−2), and (2) ANOVA p-value (condition pair) ≤0.05, were used to analyze the data. A tighter LFC of >(+1.2) and <(−1.2), as proposed in [34 (link)], was also tested, but deemed impractical because of an unrealistically high number of samples needed to satisfy statistical criteria (see Discussion).
The RP-UPLC/MS data were analyzed using MassLynx (v.4.1), MSe Data Viewer (v.1.4), and Progenesis QI software packages (from Waters). A Supplemental Table S1 lists major lipids of human meibum relevant to this study, and their corresponding m/z values. SigmaStat and SigmaPlot software packages from Systat Software, Inc. were used to conduct statistical evaluation of the data.
The transcriptomic and lipidomic data for two genders were compared gender-wide using Student’s t-test for the two groups. Tests with p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Principal component analyses were performed using Transcriptome Analysis Console, Progenesis QI, and EZInfo (v.3.0.3.0 from Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Metabolomics Data Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All multivariate raw data were processed using Progenesis QI (Nonlinear dynamics, Newcastle UK) which performed run alignment, peak picking, adduct deconvolution and eventual feature (linked mass/retention time pairs) database searching. Principle component analysis (PCA), using Pareto scaling, was performed using Ezinfo (Umetrics, Umeå SE) in order to visualise group separation, and orthogonal partial least squared discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) to identify significant features. In the assessment of chromatographic performance, specific target compounds were extracted and integrated using TargetLynx (Waters Corporation, Milford USA). The databases used to generate potential identifications were the Metlin MS/MS (Scripps Institute, CA, USA) and the human metabolome database (HMDB) (Wishart et al. 2018 (link)) with precursor and fragmentation ion accuracy set to 10 ppm. For CCS measurements, the IROA CCS database (Waters Corporation, Milford USA) with a tolerance to the database value of 2.5% was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lipid Profile Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multivariate statistical analysis of lipid profiles was performed using EZinfo (Umetrics). Univariate Analyses were performed using the software SigmaPlot version 12.0. Data were first analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk to determine whether data were normally distributed. When data passed the test, the Student’s test (t-test) was applied to evaluate statistically significant difference between values (p < 0.05). For non-normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Amyloid-Beta Peptide Analysis by IMMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition was carried out with MassLynx (V4.1) and DriftScope (V2.8) software. The total arrival time distribution (ATD) files classified as “Aβ40” and “Aβ40 plus Porph” were thus exported from DriftScope (V2.8) to Progenesis QI (64-bit, Nonlinear Dynamics). The Progenesis QI data analysis software is a small molecule discovery tool predominantly used to identify the significantly changing compounds in your dataset. In this particular case, the software was used for drift time alignment, peak picking, and normalization using total ion intensity. We obtained three data matrices, one for each of the investigated data set. Multiple features with same drift time and different m/z may belong to the same compound due to the fragmentation, adduct formation, or clustering. The three data matrices were then exported from Progenesis QI to the statistical package EZinfo (V3.0.1.0, Umetrics). This was used to build 2-class orthogonal projection to latent structure-discriminant (OPLS-DA) models and S-plots for each sample set under investigation. Protein Prospector V5.22.1 (UCSF Mass Spectrometry Facility) and Fragment Ion Calculator (ISB Data Access Server) were used to analyze the MS/MS fragmentation ions from peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multivariate Data Analysis Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MVA data analyses, including PCA, PLS-DA and OPLS-DA, were performed using SIMCA P+ 10.5 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden), EZinfo (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) and Metaboanalyst. Kernel-based MVA methods were also employed (e.g., kPCA) using a variety of kernels such as polynomial Gaussian, etc., via the kernlab R package. Sparse principal component analysis (sPCA), sparse independent principal component analysis (siPCA), sparse partial least squares–discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) and multilevel sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis (ML-sPLS-DA) were performed using the mixOmics package (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/mixOmics.html, accessed on 28 December 2021) as implemented in R 3.0.2 (http://http://cran.r-project.org, accessed on 28 December 2021). ANOVA was performed on the important metabolites and their intensity values selected as biomarkers by the ML-sPLS-DA models. The statistical procedures we employed are described in Supplementary Methodology C, except for ML-sPLSDA, which was the methodology that provided the statistically meaningful results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multivariate Analysis of MS Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSE data in the negative mode were processed using Progenesis QI (Nonlinear Dynamics), which generated a collection of chemical features; these were represented by their retention time, mass-to-charge (m/z), and ion intensity. Triplicate measurements of each individual sample were averaged. Subsequently, the ion intensities of all the chemical features from the different batches were normalized against the pQC reference sample. The principle component analysis (PCA) of the selected groups was carried out using EZinfo (Umetrics, version 3.0.3). The detailed procedures for the pQC normalization are described in the Supplementary Methods. The ROC curve analysis was carried out using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Sludge

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Since GC-MS analysis could only work on relatively volatile and thermo-stable compounds (MW < 580 Da) effectively, untargeted analysis of sludge samples using UPLC-MS approach was conducted to profile and identify more compounds with higher MW (< 2 kDa).
First, the filtered samples were lyophilized, from which the fractions of polar metabolites and non-polar lipids were extracted following the steps in Tipthara et al. During data processing, the software of EZinfo (version 3.0.3.0, Umetrics) was used for multivariate analysis of compounds in raw WAS, 172 ºC thermal pretreated sludge, digested sludge samples with and without 172 ºC pretreatment respectively. The most significant compounds were selected by orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and then exported to the software of Progenesis QI for further identification and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling of Sludge

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolites fraction and lipids fraction were extracted from the lyophilized substances following the procedures in Tipthara et al. (2017) , and analyzed by ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, USA) coupled with a Xevo G2-XS QToF mass spectrometer (Waters, U.K.) with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Detailed description and analysis of Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS) operation process can be found in Tipthara et al. (2017) .
EZinfo (version 3.0.3.0, Umetrics) was used for multivariate analysis of compounds in raw WAS, ALK-ULS pretreated sludge and digested sludge samples respectively. The most significant components were determined by orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and then exported from S-plot back to Progenesis QI for further analysis and identification. Polar and lipid biomolecules were identified using (1) MetaScope by searching compounds against structural databases (SDFs) for E. coli (http://ecmdb.ca/), LIPID MAPS (http://www. lipidmaps.org/), HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), and ChEBI (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/) and ( 2)
Chemspider by searching compounds against the KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multivariate Analysis of Metabolomic Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on growth performance and targeted analysis were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by the Student Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05). After data preprocessing of untargeted metabolomics, multivariate analysis was performed to find discriminative features among groups by means of the EZ-Info software (Umetrics, Sweden). First, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to ensure the absence of outliers and the correct classification of QCs after normalization. Then, all the four experimental groups were joined in a single file and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) was conducted to maximize the separation of dietary groups. The contribution of m/z features to the PLS-DA model was assessed by means of variable importance in projection (VIP) measurements. A VIP score > 1 was considered an adequate threshold to determine discriminant variables in the PLS-DA model (Wold et al., 2001; Li et al., 2012; Kieffer et al., 2016) . Additionally, orthogonal PLS-DA (Wiklund et al., 2008) with a high threshold (P [corr] > 0.7) was carried out to highlight the most discriminant compounds. To end, differences in normalized peak areas of m/z features were analysed by One-way ANOVA followed by Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction analysis (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!