The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using alugram xtra sil g uv254

1

Facile Synthesis of Functionalized Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents and chemicals from commercial sources were used without further purification. Solvents were dried and purified using standard techniques. Flash chromatography was performed with analytical-grade solvents using Aldrich silica gel (technical grade, pore size 60Å, 230–400 mesh particle size). Flexible plates ALUGRAM® Xtra SIL G UV254 from MACHEREY-NAGEL were used for TLC. Compounds were detected by UV irradiation (Bioblock Scientific). NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AVANCE III 300 (1H, 300 MHz and 13C, 75 MHz) or a Bruker AVANCE DRX500 (1H, 500 MHz; 13C, 125 MHz). Chemical shifts are given in ppm relative to TMS and coupling constants J in Hz. Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization was performed on MALDI-TOF MS BIFLEX III Bruker Daltonics spectrometer using DCTB+ as matrix. High resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed with a JEOL JMS-700 B/E.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TLC was performed using pre-coated TLC-sheets ALUGRAM® Xtra SIL G/UV254 (Macherey-Nagel). The compounds were detected with UV light (254 nm and 366 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Cinnamaldehyde and Metabolite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard working solutions of CNA (cinnamaldehyde) and its metabolite CN-OH (cinnamic alcohol) were prepared by diluting aliquots of >98% stock solutions in DMSO. Overnight bacterial cultures were diluted into 20 mL of fresh MHB, and incubated with shaking (250 rpm) at 37 °C. When the cultures reached an absorbance of A600 nm = 0.8, CNA was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. After one and two hours of exposure, the growth medium was collected by centrifugation and filtration through two filters of 0.45 and 0.2 µm pore size, successively. An organic extraction was repeated three times using 25 mL dichloromethane (for a total volume of 75 mL). The organic fractions were pooled and dried under rotative evaporator, and finally redissolved in 1 mL methanol. Standards were diluted (1:100) in methanol. A fraction of 25 µL for sample and 2 µL for standards was sprayed as 8 mm bands on a TLC plate (Alugram® Xtra SIL G UV254, Macherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France) using an automatic sampler (ATS4, Camag, Moirans, France) connected to visionCATS Camag TLC software V2.4. The TLC plate was developed in an automatic developing chamber (ADC 2, Camag) with a mobile phase containing cyclohexane:ethyl acetate (7:2) over a 70 mm developing distance. Spots were observed using UV-light at 254 nm (CV-415.LS, Uvitech, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis and Characterization of CBV4-57

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
If not otherwise stated, the different chemicals for the synthesis of CBV4-57 were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Sigma Aldrich S.a.r.l; Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). Furthermore, unless otherwise noted, all experiments were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere. Solvents (CH2Cl2 and THF) were dried via a purification solvent system MB-SP- 800 (MBRAUN, Garching, Germany). Melting points (mp) were obtained on a on a Mettler-Toledo MP50 apparatus (Mettler-Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA)and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet Nexus spectrometer (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 300 MHz spectrometers (Bruker, Wissembourg, France). The NMR spectra were acquired in CDCl3, and the chemical shifts were reported in parts per million referring to CHCl3H 7.26 for proton and δC 77.16 for carbon). Signals are described as follows: s, singlet; brs, broad signal; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet. HRMS data were recorded on a Xevo G2 QTOF instrument (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Reactions were monitored by TLC on silica gel Alugram® Xtra SIL G/UV254 (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany). Column chromatography was performed on Machery-Nagel silica gel 0.063-0.2 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thin-Layer Chromatography of Propolis Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) plates, composed of a 0.2 mm thick precoated silica gel 60F-254 layer (precoated TLC-sheets ALUGRAM Xtra SIL, G/UV 254 from Macherey-Nagel, Germany), received 1 μL of the propolis extracts (containing 50–100 μg of propolis extract), placed 1 cm from the lower edge of the plate. Preliminary TLC separation of the extracts was performed using different solvent systems; the solvent front was allowed to travel to at least 75% of the TLC plate height. Two solvent systems, n-hexane : ethyl acetate : formic acid (30 : 70 : 1) as a combination of nonpolar solvents and ethyl acetate : methanol : formic acid (50 : 50 : 1) as a combination of polar solvents, were used to elute the compounds in the extracts [18 (link)]. The spots were visualized using natural light, short wave ultraviolet (254 nm), and long wave ultraviolet (366 nm) for detecting the fluorescence compounds and by spraying with an anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid agent followed by heating at 110°C for detecting triterpenoids [19 (link)]. Finally, the TLC plates were photographed by a TLC visualizer 2 (CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland). Each spot was marked, and the retardation factor (Rf) value was calculated. The Rf value of the separated compound was defined as the distance travelled by the compound divided by the distance travelled by the solvent (the solvent front).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phytochemical Fractionation for Mosquito Larvicides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractionation of active constituents in the crude leaf extract was performed on silica-packed column chromatography. Silica (200 g; Kiesegel 60 M [0.004–0.063 mm mesh size]; Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co.KG, Düren, Germany) was packed in 40 × 330 mm column and conditioned with analytical grade n-hexane (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) for 3 h prior sample loading. Thirty-five grams of the leaf extract were loaded onto the packed silica and elution of various fractions achieved through gradient mobile phase of analytical grade n-hexane and ethyl acetate (100:0–0:100) and finally methanol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Fractions were chromatographed on thin layer chromatography (TLC) silica plates (ALUGRAM® Xtra SIL G/UV254 [0.2 mm], Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co.KG, Düren, Germany) developed with n-hexane and ethyl acetate (1:2 v/v) as mobile phase. The plates were air-dried, sprayed with 30 % sulfuric acid and baked in an oven for detection under UV lamp (λ254–365 nm). Based on TLC monitoring and evaluations, fractions with similar retention factor (Rf) values were pooled together, rotor-evaporated and assayed for activity against mosquito larvae.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Thin-Layer Chromatography for API Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TLC plates of 5 × 10 cm size with fluorescence indicator (TLC Silica gel 60 F254; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, or ALUGRAM® Xtra SIL G UV254, Macherey–Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) were used. Sample and reference solutions were applied to these plates manually, using 2 µl capillaries (minicaps®, Hirschmann Laborgeräte GmbH & Co. KG, Eberstadt, Germany). Two different spotting patterns were evaluated, shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. Plates were developed as described in the respective monographs of the GPHF Minilab Manual49 . The composition of the mobile phases is given in Supplementary Table S1. After development, the plates were left to dry completely for at least 30 min at room temperature. The spots of the APIs were detected under UV light using a battery-operated hand lamp (MINI-UV Test Lamp, 256 nm, Prinz Verlag GmbH, Passau, Germany). Storage of the developed plates for up to three days, protected from light and humidity, did not affect the quantitative evaluation for the investigated APIs. No chemical staining of the spots was carried out in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

NMR and Chromatographic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Instrumentation included JEOL spectrometer with tetramethylsilane as an internal standard for 1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR spectra. Materials used in chromatography; normal-phase silica gel for column chromatography (Fluka®, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 230–400 mesh), pre-coated TLC-plates ALUGRAM Xtra SIL G/UV254 (MACHEREY-NAGEL®, Düren, Germany, 0.2 mm) (normal phase), Sil G-25 unmodified standarad silica layers on glass for Preparative TLC, layer thickness 2 mm (MACHEREY-NAGEL®, Düren, Germany) and Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma Aldrich®, Darmstadt, Germany). Anisaldehyde–sulfuric acid was used as a spraying reagent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Citral Antimicrobial Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A standard working solution of citral was prepared by diluting aliquots of >98% stock solutions in methanol. Overnight bacterial cultures were diluted into 25 mL of fresh MHB and incubated with shaking (250 rpm) at 37°C. When cultures reached an absorbance of A600nm = 0.8, citral was added to a 2 or 4 mg/mL final concentration. Aliquots were removed at t0h, t1h, t3h, and t24h post-exposure; the growth medium was then collected by centrifugation and filtration through two filters of 0.45 and 0.2 μm pore size, respectively. An organic extraction was repeated three times using 1 mL dichloromethane (for a total volume of 3 mL). The organic fractions were pooled and dried overnight in a chemical hood, and were finally re-dissolved in 500 μL of dichloromethane. Organic fractions and standards were diluted (1:200 for organic fraction and 1:2,000 for standard) in methanol. Ten microliter volumes were then sprayed as 8 mm bands on a TLC plate (Alugram® Xtra SIL G UV254, Macherey-Nagel) using an automatic sampler (ATS4, Camag, Moirans, France) connected to visionCATS Camag TLC software V2.4. The TLC plates were developed in an automatic developing chamber (ADC 2, Camag) with a mobile phase containing cyclohexane:ethyl acetate (7:2) over a 70 mm migration distance. Spots were observed using UV-light at 254 nm (CV-415.LS, Uvitech, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Lipid Extraction and Separation in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total lipids were extracted using the method of Bligh and Dyer, as modified by Ames [26 (link),27 (link)]. E. coli cells were induced in 25 mL of culture, as previously described for protein expression except that induction was reduced to 4 hours. Cells were then harvested with a 4 000 x g centrifugation for 10 min, the pellet was re-suspended in 0.8 mL of PBS, and 2 mL of methanol and 1 mL of chloroform were added with thorough mixing. After 1 h at room temperature, 1 mL of chloroform and 1 mL of PBS solution were added and then the phases were thoroughly mixed. After a brief low-speed centrifugation, the resulting organic phase was carefully removed, dried under N2, re-suspended in a small volume of chloroform and then analyzed for individual phospholipids. Two-dimensional thin layer chromatography, on pre-coated TLC-sheets ALUGRAM® Xtra SIL G/UV254 (Macherey Nagel), was used to separate the different lipids. For the first dimension, a solution of chloroform / methanol / water (65:25:4, v/v/v) was used and then a chloroform / methanol / acetic acid (65:25:10, v/v/v) solution was employed for the second dimension. After drying the plates, lipids were visualized by exposure to iodine vapor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!