The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3200 q trap hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer is an analytical instrument designed for the detection and identification of chemical compounds. It combines the capabilities of a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer and a linear ion trap mass spectrometer in a single system. The instrument is capable of performing a variety of mass spectrometry techniques, including quantitative and qualitative analysis of small molecules, peptides, and proteins.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using 3200 q trap hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer

1

Plant Hormone Quantification in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hormone analysis was carried out on four samples, each of which contained all seedlings from six of the 24 wells or from the four-week-old A. thaliana three leaf discs from every single plant were sampled, three individual plants were sampled as one sample. Plant hormone levels were determined as described by40 (link). Briefly, samples were homogenized in tubes with 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA). The samples were then extracted with a methanol/H2O/formic acid (15:4:1, v:v:v) mixture, which was supplemented with stable isotope-labeled phytohormone internal standards (10 pmol per sample) in order to check recovery during purification and validate the quantification. The clarified supernatants were subjected to solid phase extraction using Oasis MCX cartridges (Waters Co., USA). The eluates were evaporated to dryness and the generated solids dissolved in 30 μl of 15% (v/v) acetonitrile in water. Quantification was performed on an Ultimate 3000 high-performance liquid chromatograph (Dionex, USA) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, USA) as described by41 (link). Metabolite levels were expressed in pmol/g fresh weight (FW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phytohormone Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen samples (ca 10 mg FW) were homogenized and extracted with cold (−20 °C) methanol/water/formic acid (15/4/1, v/v/v) as described in Dobrev and Kaminek [16 (link)] and Dobrev and Vankova [17 (link)]. The following isotope-labelled internal standards (10 pmol/sample) were then added 2H5-tZ, 2H5-tZR, 2H5-tZRMP, 2H5-tZ7G, 2H5-tZ9G, 2H5-tZOG, 2H5-tZROG, 2H3-DZ, 2H3-DZR, 2H3-DZ9G, 2H3-DZRMP, 2H7-DZOG, 2H6-iP, 2H6-iPR, 2H6-iP7G, 2H6-iP9G, 2H6-iPRMP (Olchemim, CR, Olomouc, Czech Republic). Phytohormones were separated with a reverse phase-cation exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) into the acid fraction by elution with methanol and into the basic fraction by elution with 0.35 M NH4OH in 60% methanol which was used for CK determination. The latter fraction was analyzed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Hormone quantification was performed by the isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (r2 > 0.99). Data processing was performed with the Analyst 1.5 software package (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phytohormone Analysis in Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The youngest fully expanded leaf samples (ca 50 mg FW) were purified and analyzed according to Dobrev and Kamínek (2002), Dobrev and Vankova (2012) and Svačinova et al. [94 –96 ]. Frozen samples were homogenized and extracted with cold (− 20 °C) methanol/water/formic acid (15/4/1, v/v/v). The following isotope-labelled internal standards (10 pmol/sample) were added: 13C6-IAA (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories); 2H4-SA (Sigma-Aldrich); 2H3-PA, 2H3-DPA (NRC-PTI); 2H6-ABA, 2H5-JA, 2H5-transZ, 2H5-transZR, 2H5-transZ7G, 2H5-transZ9G, 2H5-transZOG, 2H5-transZROG, 2H5-transZRMP, 2H3-DZ, 2H3-DZR, 2H3-DZ9G, 2H6-iP, 2H6-iPR, 2H6-iP7G, 2H6-iP9G, 2H6-iPRMP (Olchemim). Phytohormones were separated with a reverse phase-cation exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX, Waters) into the acid fraction by elution with methanol [auxins, abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA)], and into the basic fraction by elution with 0.35 M NH4OH in 60% methanol [cytokinins (CKs)]. Fractions were analyzed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). Hormone quantification was performed by the isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (r2 > 0.99). Data processing was performed with the Analyst 1.5 software package (Applied Biosystems). Raw data are included in the Supplemented Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ABA and Related Plant Hormone Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ABA level in seeds was assayed according to a previously published procedure72 , using the Phytodetek ABA Test Kit (Agdia, Elkhart, IN, USA). The assay was done in 3 biological replicates, each performed as 3 technical replicates. ABA, PA and DPA level in shoots was assayed using the liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method. The samples were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Plant hormones were extracted, purified and quantified according to reported procedures73 (link),74 (link). Briefly, samples were extracted with extraction buffer methanol/H2O/formic acid (15:4:1, v-v:v) supplemented with stable isotope-labelled internal standards (10 pmol per sample). The extracts were purified by solid phase extraction (SPE) using Oasis MCX cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The SPE eluates were evaporated to dryness and pellets dissolved in 30 μl of 5% methanol in water (v/v). Quantification was done on an Ultimate 3000 high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC; Dionex, Bannockburn, IL, USA) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).) using isotope dilution method. Data processing was carried out with Analyst 1.5 software (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phytohormone Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phytohormones were extracted, purified and quantified according to previously published methods [8 (link)]. In summary, the samples were homogenized with a MM301 ball mill (Retsch, Prague, Czech Republic) and stable isotope-labelled internal standards. Extraction occurred in cold (−20°C) methanol/water/formic acid (15:4:1, v/v/v). The extracts were purified using an Oasis-MCX mixed-mode solid-phase extraction (SPE) column (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). The resulting two fractions contained acidic and basic phytohormones. The fraction of basic phytohormones, including CKs, was analyzed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA,) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Data processing and hormone quantification were done using Analyst 1.5 software (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Phytohormones Using HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen samples (ca. 50 mg FW) were homogenized and extracted with cold (−20 °C) methanol/water/formic acid (15/4/1, v/v/v) as described previously [50 (link),51 ]. The following isotope-labelled internal standards (10 pmol/sample) were added: 13C6-IAA (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories); 2H4-SA (Sigma-Aldrich); 2H3-PA, 2H3-DPA (NRC-PBI); 2H6-ABA, 2H5-JA, 2H5-transZ, 2H5-transZR, 2H5-transZ7G, 2H5-transZ9G, 2H5-transZOG, 2H5-transZROG, 2H5-transZRMP, 2H3-DZ, 2H3-DZR, 2H3-DZ9G, 2H6-iP, 2H6-iPR, 2H6-iP7G, 2H6-iP9G, 2H6-iPRMP (Olchemim). Phytohormones were separated with a reverse-phase cation exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX, Waters) into the acid fraction by elution with methanol (auxins, ABA, SA, JA), and into the basic fraction by elution with 0.35 M NH4OH in 60% methanol (CKs). Fractions were analyzed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). Hormone quantification was performed by the isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (r2 > 0.99). Data processing was performed with the Analyst 1.5 software package (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phytohormone Profiling in Inflorescences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentrations of the endogenous phytohormones including cytokinins, auxins, gibberellins, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), brassinosteroids, benzoic acid, and their metabolites were determined in developing inflorescences (pooled flowering shoot apices harvested on 40-day-old plants) of ufd and WT plants according to Quinet et al. (2014 (link)). Phytohormones were extracted using 50–100 mg lyophilised plant material from three biological replicates with methanol/formic acid/water (15:1:4, by volume) and then purified using the dual-mode solid-phase method (Dobrev and Kamínek, 2002 (link)). An HPLC Ultimate 3000 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used to perform the analysis and quantification of plant hormone levels by means of a multilevel calibration graph with 2H-labeled internal standards. Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's-test were applied to evaluate the normality and homogeneity of the results, respectively (data were transformed when required). ANOVA and Student's-test were used for statistical analysis to evaluate the significance of the genotype effects on the hormonal composition using SAS 9.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Xylem Sap Sampling for Hormone Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The xylem sap was sampled by the root pressure method (Alexou and Peuke, 2013 (link)) on 5 sequential days on 1 replication per treatment chosen randomly. The plants were cut with a clean garden scissor 5 cm above the root–shoot interface. The cut surface was cleaned with deionized water and a silicon tube was fixed over the stump and sealed with silicone grease. The xylem exudate collection was initiated 30 min later. The sap was collected with a pipette for 30 min, transferred to plastic vials on ice, and subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. To minimize the potential effect of diurnal variation, we spred the harvesting process over 5 days. This approach ensured that xylem sap collections were consistently performed during a relatively short and uniform period each day, specifically between 10:00 and 11:30. The hormones in the xylem sap were analyzed with an HPLC system (Ultimate 3000, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The sample preparation and analysis procedures were as described by Paponov et al. (Paponov et al., 2021 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!