The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sonata scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Sonata scanner is a laboratory equipment device designed for high-performance scanning applications. It utilizes advanced scanning technology to deliver accurate and reliable data capture. The core function of the Sonata scanner is to provide efficient and precise scanning capabilities for a variety of laboratory workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using sonata scanner

1

In Vivo Amyloid PET Imaging of Alzheimer's

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects underwent a structural T1-weighted MR scan on a 1.5T Siemens Sonata scanner and, within 1 week, two 90-min dynamic [11C]PiB PET scans (test and retest) on a Siemens ECAT EXACT HR+ scanner [10 (link)]. Each dynamic scan consisted of 23 consecutive time frames (1×15, 3×5, 3×10, 2×30, 3×60, 2×150, 2×300, 7×600 s). All participants received an intravenous injection of, on average 332±70 MBq for test (353±26 for CUs, 138 for the MCI patient, and 342±66 for the AD dementia patients)and 376±43 MBq (355±37 for CUs, 368 for the MCI patient, and 393±47 for the AD dementia patients) for retest scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Brain Imaging of Healthy Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study included 50 men (mean age ± SD: 41.64 ± 13.53) and 50 women (mean age ± SD: 45.00 ± 13.85) obtained from the International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) database of normal adults (http://www.loni.usc.edu/ICBM/Databases/). All subjects gave their informed consent in accordance with the policies and procedures of UCLA’s Institutional Review Board. All brain data were collected on a 1.5 Tesla Siemens Sonata scanner (Erlangen, Germany) using an 8-channel head coil and a T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence with the following parameters: 1900 ms repetition time, 4.38 ms echo time, 15° flip angle, 160 contiguous sagittal slices, 256x256 mm2 field-of-view, 1x1x1 mm3 voxel size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole Brain T1-Weighted MRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole brain T1 weighted MPRAGE images were acquired at 1.5T using an 8 channel phased array headcoil on a Siemens Sonata scanner at the VU University in Amsterdam and a Siemens Avanto MR scanner at the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour in Nijmegen. A breakdown of the distribution of subjects scanned at the two sites is included in S1 Table. Sequence parameters were as follows: TI/TE/TR = 1000/2.95/2730 ms, imaging matrix 256 x 256, 176 slices, voxel size 1 x 1 x 1 mm3, GRAPPA acceleration 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Brain Imaging of Meditation Practitioners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects (meditators/controls) were scanned on the same site, using the same scanner, and following the same scanning protocol. Specifically, magnetic resonance images were acquired on a 1.5 Tesla Siemens Sonata scanner (Erlangen, Germany) using an 8-channel head coil and a T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence (1900 ms TR, 4.38 ms TE, 15° flip angle, 160 contiguous sagittal slices, 256 mm × 256 mm FOV, 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm voxel). The obtained structural brain images were then corrected for intensity inhomogeneities and linearly transferred into a standard space using six-parameter (rigid-body) normalizations, as previously detailed (Luders et al., 2013b (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Functional and Structural Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were obtained using a 3-T Siemens Sonata scanner. Functional imaging data were analysed using FEAT 6.0, part of FSL (FMRIB Software Library; fmrib.ox.ac.ul/fsl) with Z>2.3 and P<0.05, including multiple-comparison corrections. T2*-weighted functional data were acquired for a whole-brain field of view (64 × 64 × 40 matrix, 45 slices, voxel resolution 3 mm3, gap 1.5 mm, repetition time=3000 ms, echo time=30 ms, flip angle=90o). Field maps were acquired using a dual-echo two-dimensional gradient echo sequence with echos at 5.19 and 7.65 ms, and a repetition time of 500 ms. High-resolution T1-weighted images were acquired for subject alignment, using an MPRAGE sequence (174 × 192 × 192 matrix, voxel resolution 1 mm3, repetition time=2040 ms, echo time=4.7 ms, inversion time=900 ms).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal PET Imaging of Amyloid and Tau

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All eight participants had baseline 18F-AZD4694 and 18F-THK5351 PET scans to quantify brain amyloid and PHF load, respectively. A second 18F-THK5351 scan was conducted 1 week later, 1 h after an oral dose of 10 mg selegiline. Participants were also invited to undergo an optional third 18F-THK5351 PET scan 10 days after the selegiline administration. Each 18F-THK5351 acquisition consisted of dynamic images (4 × 5 min) acquired at 50–70 min after intravenous bolus injection. The mean ± standard deviation injected radioactivity of 18F-THK5351 was 6.6 ± 0.3 mCi for the baseline scan, 6.7 ± 0.4 mCi for the post-selegiline scan, and 6.9 ± 0.4 mCi for the third scan. 18F-AZD4694 acquisition consisted of dynamic images (6 × 5 min) acquired at 40–70 min after intravenous bolus injection of 18F-AZD4694. The injected radioactivity of 18F-AZD4694 was 6.3 ± 0.3 mCi. A 6-min transmission scan was acquired at the end of each PET scan. All PET scans were performed using the Siemens High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT). A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomical scan was also performed for all patients using the 1.5 T Siemens Sonata scanner for co-registration purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural Brain Imaging of Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For patients, we acquired structural brain images. Twenty-nine patients received research-quality MRI or CT scans. For 19 of 29 patients, we collected high-resolution, whole-brain T1 -weighted MR images on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner (repetition time = 1620 ms, echo time = 3.87 ms, field of view = 192 × 256 mm, 1 × 1 × 1 mm voxels) using a Siemens 8-channel head coil. Three of 29 patients were contraindicated for a 3T environment, so we collected whole-brain T1 -weighted MR images on a 1.5T Siemens Sonata scanner (repetition time = 3000 ms, echo time = 3.54 ms, field of view = 24 cm, 1.25 × 1.25 × 1.2 mm voxels) using a Siemens 8-channel head coil. Seven of 29 patients were contraindicated for MRI and underwent whole-brain CT scans without contrast (60 axial slices, 3-5 mm slice thickness) on a 64-slice Siemens SOMATOM Sensation scanner. Two patients declined to receive research-quality scans, so we acquired recent clinical MRI (n = 1) and CT (n = 1) scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Voxel-Based Morphometry of T1-Weighted MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1-weighted high resolution MRI images were obtained with a FLASH 3D sequence on a 1.5 Tesla Siemens Sonata scanner acquiring 192 sagittal slices (repetition time = 15 ms, echo time = 5 ms, Flip Angle = 30°) and using a standard 4-channel head coil. The original DICOM images were converted into the Nifti format using Dcm2Nii (MRIcroN). The CAT12- toolbox was used for preprocessing and VBM analyses (http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/), as it provides substantial improvements relative to the standard algorithms of the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM) (for e.g. segmentation without tissue priors, integration of Dartel normalization). T1 data segmentation was performed and resulting probability maps for Gray Matter (GM) and White Matter (WM) were spatially normalized into MNI space using the default toolbox settings. Smoothing was applied with a standard Gaussian Kernel of 8 mm. Implicit masking was applied using an absolute threshold of 0.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

fMRI Acquisition and Preprocessing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired at the “CERMEP-Imagerie du vivant” imaging center of Lyon (France) on a 1.5T Siemens Sonata scanner with a standard 8-channel head coil. For fMRI, echo planar T2*-weighted axial images were acquired with the following parameters: 26 interleaved slices; repetition time = 2500 ms; echo time = 60 ms; field of view = 240 mm2; flip angle = 90°; matrix = 64 × 64 (voxel size: 3.75 × 3.75 × 4 mm). Manual shimming was performed on the whole brain to improve the local field homogeneity and minimize susceptibility artifacts. Before the first fMRI session, a 3D T1-weighted anatomical scan was acquired (176 axial slices; repetition time = 1970 ms; echo time = 3.93 ms; field of view = 256 mm2; voxel size = 1 mm3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cortical Surface Reconstruction and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two sets of structural MRI images were acquired for each participant using a 3-T Siemens Sonata scanner (Malvern, PA, USA) with a high-resolution 3-D T1-weighted magnetization-prepared 180° radio-frequency pulses and rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) sequence optimized for gray–white matter contrast differentiation. The two sets of scans were registered and averaged. The cortical white matter was segmented and the border between gray and white matter was tessellated, providing a representation of the cortical surface with ~150,000 vertices per hemisphere (Fischl et al., 2001 (link)). The folded tessellated surface was then “inflated” in order to unfold cortical sulci, thereby providing a convenient format for visualizing cortical activation patterns (Fischl et al., 1999 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!