The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using rabbit anti cd11b

1

Tumor Microvasculature and Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SeeTable S3. Tumor microvascular density was assessed using the rat anti-mouse CD31 (PECAM-1, clone SZ31) antibody (Dianova). The following antibodies were used to characterize immune cell subpopulations in the LL/2 tumors: rat anti-CD45 (Novus Biologicals), rabbit anti-CD11 b, rat anti-Ly6G/Ly6c (Novusbio), mouse anti-CD3, rat anti-CD4, goat anti-CD8 (Santa Cruz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of sEH, CD11b, CREB, and p-CREB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed to detect the level of sEH, CD11b, CREB, and p-CREB in the PFC and Hip. Protein extracts were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to cellulose acetate membranes. After that, the membranes were blocked and incubated with primary antibodies including rabbit anti-sEH (63kDa, 1:500, ABclonal), rabbit anti-CREB (43kDa, 1:1000, CST), rabbit anti-CREB-phospho Ser133 (43kDa, 1:1000, CST), and rabbit anti-CD11b (127kDa, 1:500, NOVUS) at 4°C for 24 hours. The rabbit anti-β-actin primary antibody (40kDa, 1:1000, Beyotime) was used as an internal reference. Twenty-four hours later, the membrane was incubated with the goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:1000, Beyotime) for 2 hours at RT. Tanon Image software (version 4100, Shanghai, China) was used to analyse the bands of target proteins. The optical density (OD) value of each sample was normalised by the corresponding amount of β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot was performed as previously described (Tramullas et al., 2010 (link)). Whole-cell lysates were prepared from the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord and total protein was determined using the Quan-iT protein assay kit (Invitrogen, Ireland). Equal amounts of protein were subjected to electrophoresis on 4–12% gradient gels (NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Ireland) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio Rad, Ireland). Membranes were then incubated with goat anti-GFAP (1:1000; Sigma, Ireland), the astrocyte marker, rabbit anti-CD11b (1:500; Novus Biologicals, UK), a microglia activation marker; and mouse anti β-actin (1:15000; Sigma, Ireland). Immunoreactivity was detected with Pierce ECL detection reagent (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA) and visualized using a luminescent image analyzer (LAS-3000, Fujifilm, Ireland). The relative density of the immunoreactive bands was quantified using Fiji Is Just ImageJ (FIJI) software (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)) and normalized to the relative density of mouse anti-β actin (Sigma, Ireland) for each sample. No significant differences were observed in the protein expression levels of β-Actin between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Pancreatic NET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was used to determine expression levels of HHLA2, B7x, CD4, CD8, CD11b, Ki67, PCNA, and Caspase 3 in pancreatic tissues from NET patients and Men1 KO and WT mice. Purified mouse anti-HHLA2 (Zhao et al. 2013 (link)) and anti-B7x antibodies (obtained from Dr. Zang’s laboratory, Einstein; 1:50 dilution)(Zang et al., 2007 (link)), rabbit anti-CD4 (1:1000 dilution; Abcam, MA, USA), rabbit anti-CD8 (1:200 dilution; Abcam, MA, USA), mouse-anti-HIF-1α (1:200 dilution; Abcam, MA, USA), rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:100 dilution; Abcam, MA, USA), rabbit anti-CD11B (1:400 dilution; Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), rabbit anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and rabbit anti-Caspase 3 (1:200 dilution; BD Pharmingen, CA, USA) antibodies were used and incubated overnight at 4°C. A HEP/DAB (ABC) detection IHC kit (Abcam, MA, USA) was used for IHC analysis. An IHC staining without primary antibody was used as a negative control and a recommended tissue for positive expression of the antibody was used as a positive control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of TLR4 and CD11b Expression in Mouse Brain and Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of 16 weeks, CRD-naïve mice were sacrificed without anesthesia and the dissected brains and spinal cords snap-frozen and stored at -80°C. Western blot was performed as previously described [31 (link)]. Whole-cell lysates were prepared from the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus and the lumbar region of the spinal cord and total protein was determined using the Quan-iT protein assay kit (Invitrogen, Ireland). Equal amounts of protein were subjected to electrophoresis on 4–12% gradient gels (NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Ireland) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio Rad, Ireland). Membranes were then incubated with rabbit anti-TLR4 (Abcam, Ireland) and rabbit anti-CD11b (Novus Biologicals, UK). Spleen lysates were used as a positive control for TLR4-antibody detection. Inmunoreactivity was detected with Pierce ECL detection reagent (Thermo Scientific, IL, USA) and visualized using a luminescent image analyzer (LAS-3000, Fugifilm, Ireland). Optical density of the immunoreactive bands was quantified using ImageJ software and normalized to mouse anti-β actin (Sigma, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!