The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microsoft office excel 2010

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Microsoft Office Excel 2010 is a spreadsheet software application. It provides tools for organizing, calculating, and analyzing data. Excel 2010 allows users to create and format spreadsheets, perform mathematical operations, and generate charts and graphs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using microsoft office excel 2010

1

Experimental Data Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments and analyses were repeated for 3 times, and the data represented the mean value. Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used for data analysis, and Origin 2021 software was used for drawing the figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Compound X

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were carried out in three replicates and the results were presented as a mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined using the Student’s t-test. A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and SPSS commercial version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) software. IC50 values (concentration that inhibited cell survival by 50%) for each cell line were calculated in Microsoft Excel 2010 using trend line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hyperspectral Data Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measured TNCs statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was finished using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and IBM SPSS Statistics (version 20.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA). Hyperspectral data was extracted with ENVI software (Version 4.6, ITT Visual Information Solutions, Boulder, USA). The processes of spectral data analyses were carried out by “The Unscrambler X10.1” (CAMO PROCESS AS, Oslo, Norway). In addition, Random frog (version 2.0) toolbox and the developed program for building TNC spatial distribution maps were worked in MATLAB 7.8 (R2009a) software (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). OriginPro 8.0 SR0 (Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) software was employed to design the spectral curves. All processes were run on a PC (CPU: Intel Core i3-3220 @3.30 GHz, RAM: 4.00 GB) operating with Windows 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Age Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subsequently, all the data were recorded in computer programs, such as Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and IBM SPSS statistics version 26 (2019) software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), which allowed the statistical study of that data. Age data were presented as mean ± SD; normality of age data was assessed by Shapiro–Wilk’s test. Since the assumption of normality was discarded, comparisons of age among groups were carried out by non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test). For comparing percentages, a chi-square test was used. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Inhaler Technique Evaluation in Asthma and COPD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at the Pulmonology Department, Hospital Central do Baixo Vouga, Portugal, in the first semester of 2013. Patients with an established diagnosis of asthma and COPD that were treated with at least one inhaler device including dry powder devices (DPI) and metered dose pressurized devices (pMDI), with or without a spacer device, were included by convenience sampling. Children up to 12 The inhalation technique was evaluated always by the same physician and using placebo or the patient`s own devices. Clinical Control was assessed before inhalation technique evaluation. All variables were evaluated at the same moment.
Data were treated in analytical statistics for comparison between quantitative variables and for association between qualitative variables, with parametric and non-parametric tests (ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact test), through the computer system Microsoft Office Excel 2010 ® and IBM SPSS Statistics 20 ® . The normality distribution of quantitative variables was tested using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and all subgroups were tested to ensure the homogeneity of variances, in order to use parametric tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!