The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Drop shape analyzer dsa25

Manufactured by Krüss
Sourced in Germany

The Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25 is a high-precision instrument designed to measure the contact angle and surface tension of liquids on various solid surfaces. It utilizes advanced optical and imaging technologies to capture and analyze the shape of a droplet on a sample. The DSA25 provides accurate and reliable data to researchers and scientists for a wide range of applications, including material characterization, wettability studies, and surface energy analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

39 protocols using drop shape analyzer dsa25

1

Water Contact Angle Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water contact angle was determined by Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25 (Kruss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) and sessile drop technique. A 15 μL drop of bidistilled water was spread on the flat surface of the samples and stabilized for 5 s for each measurement. All measurements were carried out at room temperature. The water contact angle was calculated from the results of five replicate measurements for each type of sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Contact Angle Characterization of Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface of each slide was characterized by contact angle measurements using Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25 (Krüss). For HSTL slides we measured the advancing, static and receding contact angle by applying 40 µL (speed 0.3 µL s−1) deionized water on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. For LSTL slides we measured the advancing, static and receding contact angle by applying 40 µL (speed 0.3 µL s−1) DMSO (VWR) and deionized water on omniphobic and omniphilic surfaces.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing 3D Matrix Surface Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the matrix surface was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), (JSM-6460 LV, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) as described previously [20 (link)] and atomic force microscopy (AFM) with Multimode 8 (Bruker, Germany) using NSG10-DLC diamond-like carbon NSG series AFM cantilever (NT-MDT, Zelenograd, Russia) in tapping mode. Fiber diameter and pore size were calculated from SEM images according to ISO 7198:1998 using AxioVision 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss, Gottingen Germany). The contact angle was determined with a Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25 (Kruss GmbH, Germany) using water as a solvent. Drop volume was set to 1 µl and camera speed was 160 frames per second as recommended by the manufacturer. The contact angle was calculated from 4 replicates for each type of 3D matrices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Seed Surface Wettability Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determination of the surface wettability of treated and untreated seeds, contact angle measurements were performed using a Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25 (Krüss GmbH, Germany) with Software ADVANCE for intelligent image evaluation algorithm. For each seed, the contact angle was measured between the surface of the seed and liquid by placing 1 µL of distilled water at 0.1 µL/s at 26.0 °C. This was performed on three seeds for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Water Contact Angle Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contact-angle measurements were done at room temperature using a 10 µl droplet of deionized water addition on the surface of the samples using Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25, Kruss GmbH, Germany. Ten readings per sample were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Substrate Surface Free Energy Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface free energies of the substrate/air interface and WCA were determined by the sessile drop method using the Drop Shape Analyzer—DSA25 (Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) (Staehlke et al., 2018 (link)). One μl drops of distilled water and diiodomethane (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Taufkirchen, Germany) were deposited on the sample surface (n = 3 at 3 drops each). WCA values were calculated with the supplied software (ADVANCE, V.1.7.2.1, Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) via the Young’s equation and the SFE according to Owens, Wendt, Rabel und Kaelble (OWRK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring Surface Free Energy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the determination of surface free energy, contact angle measurements were performed: 1 µL of distilled water and 1 µL of methylene iodide were applied to the specimen’s surface. Within 30 s after application, a computer-aided measurement device (Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25, Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) performed ten contact angle measurements for each liquid. The surface free energy was calculated using the formula introduced by Owens and Wendt [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Functionalized Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The static contact angle was measured using a Drop Shape Analyzer DSA25 (Krüss) by applying 50 ​μL of deionized water on a non-functionalized hydrophilic surface and on a hydrophilic surface, functionalized with linker and capped with acetic anhydride.
For kinetic experiments (attenuated total reflection infrared [ATR-IR spectroscopy, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry [ToF-SIMS]), several spots of a DMA slide were functionalized with the linker as described previously, with exposure of the hydrophilic spots to the linker solution at different times (e.g. in the range of 1 ​h–18 ​h). After functionalization with the linker, capping of the unreacted amino groups, and thorough washing in acetone and drying in nitrogen flow, the DMA slide was subjected to the respective analytical method. For ToF-SIMS depth profiling, different polymer thicknesses were adjusted during the polymerization process by using Teflon film spacers of 6- and 25-μm thickness. The exact final thickness of the polymer layer was determined by profilometry (Dektak XT Stylus Profiler; Bruker Nano, Karlsruhe, Germany).
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on the DMA slide, which was exposed to the linker solution for 18 ​h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Contact Angle Measurement of Solid Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powdered samples were compacted into 4.5 cm in diameter disks and placed on the lifting table of a Drop Shape Analyzer DSA 25 (Krüss, Hamburg, Germany). Then, an automated dosing syringe containing water at 20 °C was used to deposit a single drop of 14 µL on the surface of the disks. The images of the water drop on the surface of the disks were recorded for 10 min by a high-resolution camera and processed by ADVANCE software ver. 1.9 (Krüss) to calculate the contact angle. Each sample had the contact angle measured in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Scaffold Mechanical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to test surfaces of the materials, including fibers diameter and pore sizes, as earlier described [23 (link)]. The contact angle was determined with a Drop Shape Analyzer DSA 25 (Kruss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), as described in the manufacturer’s instructions.
A Universal Zwick/Roell Z100 (Zwick Roell AG, Ulm, Germany) test bench was used to study mechanical properties of scaffolds, as described in ISO 7198:1998 (4 replicates for every scaffold) [23 (link)]. A “wet” sample was obtained after incubation of a matrix in water for 30 min at 20–23 °C to moisten the 3D matrix completely. The strength and elongation of matrices were determined from the constructed tensile curves in four replicates. Young’s modulus was determined in experiments with statistical loading. Before testing, the material was conditioned by loading the test specimen 5 times (each for 10–20 s) using 30–50% of the elastic limit load determined in the preliminary test. The static load was increased in steps of 10 g (to 60–70% of the elastic limit) that were applied for 20 s with a subsequent measuring of the deformation after unloading. The load that induced more than 5% elongation after unloading was considered the elastic limit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!